INWORKS实体癌死亡率风险估计远高于等效的LSS风险估计。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dose-Response Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1177/15593258251382312
Ken Chaplin
{"title":"INWORKS实体癌死亡率风险估计远高于等效的LSS风险估计。","authors":"Ken Chaplin","doi":"10.1177/15593258251382312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk estimates for solid cancer mortality are much higher in the INWORKS study than in the LSS study.<sup>1,2</sup> However, some analysts have reached the opposite conclusion by comparing non-equivalent risk estimates in the 2 studies.<sup>3</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":11285,"journal":{"name":"Dose-Response","volume":"23 3","pages":"15593258251382312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INWORKS Solid Cancer Mortality Risk Estimate is Much Higher than the Equivalent LSS Risk Estimate.\",\"authors\":\"Ken Chaplin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15593258251382312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Risk estimates for solid cancer mortality are much higher in the INWORKS study than in the LSS study.<sup>1,2</sup> However, some analysts have reached the opposite conclusion by comparing non-equivalent risk estimates in the 2 studies.<sup>3</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dose-Response\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"15593258251382312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dose-Response\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15593258251382312\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dose-Response","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15593258251382312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

INWORKS研究中实体癌死亡率的风险估计值远高于LSS研究1,2然而,一些分析人士通过比较两项研究中不相等的风险估计得出了相反的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INWORKS Solid Cancer Mortality Risk Estimate is Much Higher than the Equivalent LSS Risk Estimate.

Risk estimates for solid cancer mortality are much higher in the INWORKS study than in the LSS study.1,2 However, some analysts have reached the opposite conclusion by comparing non-equivalent risk estimates in the 2 studies.3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dose-Response
Dose-Response PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dose-Response is an open access peer-reviewed online journal publishing original findings and commentaries on the occurrence of dose-response relationships across a broad range of disciplines. Particular interest focuses on experimental evidence providing mechanistic understanding of nonlinear dose-response relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信