乳糜泻诊断时出现报警症状与较差的长期治疗结果无关。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eneli Katunin, Camilla Pasternack, Kalle Kurppa, Teea Salmi, Heini Huhtala, Katri Kaukinen, Rakel Nurmi
{"title":"乳糜泻诊断时出现报警症状与较差的长期治疗结果无关。","authors":"Eneli Katunin, Camilla Pasternack, Kalle Kurppa, Teea Salmi, Heini Huhtala, Katri Kaukinen, Rakel Nurmi","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alarm symptoms at coeliac disease (CeD) diagnosis predict a more severe disease presentation, but the long-term implications remain unclear. We studied the prevalence of alarm symptoms at diagnosis and their association with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method cohort study combined retrospective medical record review with data collection through patient interviews and blood sampling from 814 adult patients with CeD after a median of 9.7 years on a gluten-free diet (GFD). Validated questionnaires assessed symptoms and quality of life. Alarm symptoms included anaemia, weight loss, dysphagia, vomiting, melaena, and rectal bleeding. Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of alarm symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45% of the patients presented with alarm symptoms, primarily (95%) anaemia and weight loss. These patients were significantly more often female (83 vs. 71%; P < 0.001), had more severe clinical presentation (P < 0.001; reported severe symptoms 41 vs. 2%) and more advanced mucosal damage (P < 0.001; subtotal or total villous atrophy 72 vs. 57%) than those without these symptoms. On GFD, these patients experienced fewer persistent symptoms (asymptomatic 71 vs. 79%; P = 0.035) but more often had osteopenia/osteoporosis (15 vs. 9%; P = 0.008). The groups did not differ in the strictness of GFD, positivity of CeD autoantibodies, quality of life, fractures, or other comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alarm symptoms were common at CeD diagnosis. After 9.7 years on a GFD, patients with alarm symptoms had a higher incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, but generally did not demonstrate poorer long-term outcomes compared to those without alarm symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presence of alarm symptoms at coeliac disease diagnosis is not associated with poorer long-term treatment outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Eneli Katunin, Camilla Pasternack, Kalle Kurppa, Teea Salmi, Heini Huhtala, Katri Kaukinen, Rakel Nurmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alarm symptoms at coeliac disease (CeD) diagnosis predict a more severe disease presentation, but the long-term implications remain unclear. We studied the prevalence of alarm symptoms at diagnosis and their association with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method cohort study combined retrospective medical record review with data collection through patient interviews and blood sampling from 814 adult patients with CeD after a median of 9.7 years on a gluten-free diet (GFD). Validated questionnaires assessed symptoms and quality of life. Alarm symptoms included anaemia, weight loss, dysphagia, vomiting, melaena, and rectal bleeding. Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of alarm symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45% of the patients presented with alarm symptoms, primarily (95%) anaemia and weight loss. These patients were significantly more often female (83 vs. 71%; P < 0.001), had more severe clinical presentation (P < 0.001; reported severe symptoms 41 vs. 2%) and more advanced mucosal damage (P < 0.001; subtotal or total villous atrophy 72 vs. 57%) than those without these symptoms. On GFD, these patients experienced fewer persistent symptoms (asymptomatic 71 vs. 79%; P = 0.035) but more often had osteopenia/osteoporosis (15 vs. 9%; P = 0.008). The groups did not differ in the strictness of GFD, positivity of CeD autoantibodies, quality of life, fractures, or other comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alarm symptoms were common at CeD diagnosis. After 9.7 years on a GFD, patients with alarm symptoms had a higher incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, but generally did not demonstrate poorer long-term outcomes compared to those without alarm symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳糜泻(CeD)诊断时的警报症状预示着更严重的疾病表现,但长期影响尚不清楚。我们研究了诊断时报警症状的患病率及其与预后的关系。方法:一项混合方法队列研究,结合回顾性医疗记录回顾,通过患者访谈和血液采样收集数据,来自814名中位数为9.7年无麸质饮食(GFD)的成年CeD患者。有效的问卷评估症状和生活质量。警报症状包括贫血、体重减轻、吞咽困难、呕吐、黑绀和直肠出血。患者按有无报警症状分组。结果:45%的患者出现报警症状,主要是(95%)贫血和体重减轻。结论:警示症状在CeD诊断中很常见。在接受GFD治疗9.7年后,有警报症状的患者骨质减少/骨质疏松症的发生率更高,但与没有警报症状的患者相比,通常没有表现出更差的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presence of alarm symptoms at coeliac disease diagnosis is not associated with poorer long-term treatment outcomes.

Objectives: Alarm symptoms at coeliac disease (CeD) diagnosis predict a more severe disease presentation, but the long-term implications remain unclear. We studied the prevalence of alarm symptoms at diagnosis and their association with outcomes.

Methods: A mixed-method cohort study combined retrospective medical record review with data collection through patient interviews and blood sampling from 814 adult patients with CeD after a median of 9.7 years on a gluten-free diet (GFD). Validated questionnaires assessed symptoms and quality of life. Alarm symptoms included anaemia, weight loss, dysphagia, vomiting, melaena, and rectal bleeding. Patients were grouped by the presence or absence of alarm symptoms.

Results: 45% of the patients presented with alarm symptoms, primarily (95%) anaemia and weight loss. These patients were significantly more often female (83 vs. 71%; P < 0.001), had more severe clinical presentation (P < 0.001; reported severe symptoms 41 vs. 2%) and more advanced mucosal damage (P < 0.001; subtotal or total villous atrophy 72 vs. 57%) than those without these symptoms. On GFD, these patients experienced fewer persistent symptoms (asymptomatic 71 vs. 79%; P = 0.035) but more often had osteopenia/osteoporosis (15 vs. 9%; P = 0.008). The groups did not differ in the strictness of GFD, positivity of CeD autoantibodies, quality of life, fractures, or other comorbidities.

Conclusion: Alarm symptoms were common at CeD diagnosis. After 9.7 years on a GFD, patients with alarm symptoms had a higher incidence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, but generally did not demonstrate poorer long-term outcomes compared to those without alarm symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信