Mallik Greene, Shrey Gohil, Brad Stieber, A Burak Ozbay, Quang A Le, Raja Kakuturu, Joseph W LeMaster, Michael Dore, A Mark Fendrick, Joseph C Anderson, Jordan J Karlitz
{"title":"美国结直肠癌筛查方式的使用(2017-2023):国家多付款人索赔数据库分析","authors":"Mallik Greene, Shrey Gohil, Brad Stieber, A Burak Ozbay, Quang A Le, Raja Kakuturu, Joseph W LeMaster, Michael Dore, A Mark Fendrick, Joseph C Anderson, Jordan J Karlitz","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2565442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of U.S. cancer mortality. This study evaluated the utilization of CRC screening modalities from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed data from 2017 to 2023 using a national multi-payer claims database, supplemented with laboratory data related to CRC screening. Patients aged 45-75 years, at average risk for CRC, with no prior CRC diagnosis, and who had continuous health insurance enrollment for 24 months (from January 1 of the baseline year to December 31 of the study year) were included. Annual proportions for colonoscopy, multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test (FIT/FOBT), and other modalities were assessed, along with sociodemographic factors. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to assess utilization trends across the years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Colonoscopy remained the most commonly used screening modality, with its share increasing slightly from 53.0% in 2017 to 58.7% in 2023. The mt-sDNA test proportion increased significantly from 2.4% in 2017 to 20.4% in 2023, while the proportion of FIT/FOBT declined significantly, from 44% to 20.4%. Similarly, significant age-related shifts in screening utilization were observed, with colonoscopy proportion increasing from 48.1% to 61.6%, mt-sDNA rising from 0.0% to 24.0%, and FIT/FOBT declining from 50.8% to 14.1% in the 45-49 age group from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRC screening utilization shifted significantly from 2017 to 2023, with increased colonoscopy and mt-sDNA use and a marked decline in FIT/FOBT. Continued monitoring is critical to ensure equitable access to effective modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of colorectal cancer screening modalities in the United States (2017-2023): a national multi-payer claims database analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mallik Greene, Shrey Gohil, Brad Stieber, A Burak Ozbay, Quang A Le, Raja Kakuturu, Joseph W LeMaster, Michael Dore, A Mark Fendrick, Joseph C Anderson, Jordan J Karlitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03007995.2025.2565442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of U.S. cancer mortality. This study evaluated the utilization of CRC screening modalities from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed data from 2017 to 2023 using a national multi-payer claims database, supplemented with laboratory data related to CRC screening. Patients aged 45-75 years, at average risk for CRC, with no prior CRC diagnosis, and who had continuous health insurance enrollment for 24 months (from January 1 of the baseline year to December 31 of the study year) were included. Annual proportions for colonoscopy, multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test (FIT/FOBT), and other modalities were assessed, along with sociodemographic factors. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to assess utilization trends across the years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Colonoscopy remained the most commonly used screening modality, with its share increasing slightly from 53.0% in 2017 to 58.7% in 2023. The mt-sDNA test proportion increased significantly from 2.4% in 2017 to 20.4% in 2023, while the proportion of FIT/FOBT declined significantly, from 44% to 20.4%. Similarly, significant age-related shifts in screening utilization were observed, with colonoscopy proportion increasing from 48.1% to 61.6%, mt-sDNA rising from 0.0% to 24.0%, and FIT/FOBT declining from 50.8% to 14.1% in the 45-49 age group from 2017 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRC screening utilization shifted significantly from 2017 to 2023, with increased colonoscopy and mt-sDNA use and a marked decline in FIT/FOBT. Continued monitoring is critical to ensure equitable access to effective modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Research and Opinion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2565442\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2565442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilization of colorectal cancer screening modalities in the United States (2017-2023): a national multi-payer claims database analysis.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of U.S. cancer mortality. This study evaluated the utilization of CRC screening modalities from 2017 to 2023.
Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed data from 2017 to 2023 using a national multi-payer claims database, supplemented with laboratory data related to CRC screening. Patients aged 45-75 years, at average risk for CRC, with no prior CRC diagnosis, and who had continuous health insurance enrollment for 24 months (from January 1 of the baseline year to December 31 of the study year) were included. Annual proportions for colonoscopy, multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test (FIT/FOBT), and other modalities were assessed, along with sociodemographic factors. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to assess utilization trends across the years.
Results: Colonoscopy remained the most commonly used screening modality, with its share increasing slightly from 53.0% in 2017 to 58.7% in 2023. The mt-sDNA test proportion increased significantly from 2.4% in 2017 to 20.4% in 2023, while the proportion of FIT/FOBT declined significantly, from 44% to 20.4%. Similarly, significant age-related shifts in screening utilization were observed, with colonoscopy proportion increasing from 48.1% to 61.6%, mt-sDNA rising from 0.0% to 24.0%, and FIT/FOBT declining from 50.8% to 14.1% in the 45-49 age group from 2017 to 2023.
Conclusion: CRC screening utilization shifted significantly from 2017 to 2023, with increased colonoscopy and mt-sDNA use and a marked decline in FIT/FOBT. Continued monitoring is critical to ensure equitable access to effective modalities.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance