澳大利亚维多利亚州医院感染预防和控制项目的资源配置。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lyn-Li Lim, Ann Bull, Stephanie K Tanamas, Noleen Bennett, Leon J Worth, N Deborah Friedman
{"title":"澳大利亚维多利亚州医院感染预防和控制项目的资源配置。","authors":"Lyn-Li Lim, Ann Bull, Stephanie K Tanamas, Noleen Bennett, Leon J Worth, N Deborah Friedman","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) programs require adequate and specialized resourcing. To advocate for future resourcing, we reviewed existing hospital IPC program resourcing in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was used. A voluntary survey was distributed to IPC program leads in Victorian hospitals. Data were collected on hospital characteristics (acute bed numbers, services), IPC program staffing (roles, experience, full-time equivalent [FTE]), and program portfolio. Anonymized responses were analyzed by sector and bed size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 113 facilities responded, corresponding to 45% of Victorian hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 200 beds reported that IPC programs had a median FTE per 100 acute beds of 1.6, compared to hospitals in the small (50-99 beds) and medium (100-199) categories, which reported 0.8 and 0.5 FTE, respectively. Median FTE per 100 acute beds was higher in public (3.2) than private (0.4) hospitals. Public hospitals had larger teams and more experienced IPC staff than private hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in IPC program resourcing are evident in Victorian hospitals, when assessed by sector and bed size. With increasing demands on IPC programs, an understanding of current resourcing assists in future workforce planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resourcing of hospital infection prevention and control programs in Victoria, Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Lyn-Li Lim, Ann Bull, Stephanie K Tanamas, Noleen Bennett, Leon J Worth, N Deborah Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) programs require adequate and specialized resourcing. To advocate for future resourcing, we reviewed existing hospital IPC program resourcing in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was used. A voluntary survey was distributed to IPC program leads in Victorian hospitals. Data were collected on hospital characteristics (acute bed numbers, services), IPC program staffing (roles, experience, full-time equivalent [FTE]), and program portfolio. Anonymized responses were analyzed by sector and bed size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 113 facilities responded, corresponding to 45% of Victorian hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 200 beds reported that IPC programs had a median FTE per 100 acute beds of 1.6, compared to hospitals in the small (50-99 beds) and medium (100-199) categories, which reported 0.8 and 0.5 FTE, respectively. Median FTE per 100 acute beds was higher in public (3.2) than private (0.4) hospitals. Public hospitals had larger teams and more experienced IPC staff than private hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in IPC program resourcing are evident in Victorian hospitals, when assessed by sector and bed size. With increasing demands on IPC programs, an understanding of current resourcing assists in future workforce planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效的医院感染预防和控制(IPC)项目需要充足和专门的资源。为了倡导未来的资源,我们回顾了澳大利亚维多利亚州现有的医院IPC项目资源。方法:采用横断面研究设计。向维多利亚州医院的IPC项目负责人分发了一份自愿调查。收集了有关医院特征(急性床位数、服务)、IPC项目人员配置(角色、经验、全职当量[FTE])和项目组合的数据。匿名回复按部门和床的大小进行分析。结果:总体而言,113家机构做出了回应,相当于维多利亚州45%的医院。床位≥200张的医院报告说,IPC项目每100张急性床位的平均FTE为1.6,而小型医院(50-99张床位)和中型医院(100-199张床位)的报告分别为0.8和0.5。公立医院每100个急性床位的平均死亡人数(3.2)高于私立医院(0.4)。公立医院比私立医院拥有更大的团队和更有经验的IPC工作人员。结论:当按部门和床位大小评估时,维多利亚州医院IPC项目资源的差异是明显的。随着IPC项目需求的增加,对当前资源的了解有助于未来的劳动力规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resourcing of hospital infection prevention and control programs in Victoria, Australia.

Background: Effective hospital infection prevention and control (IPC) programs require adequate and specialized resourcing. To advocate for future resourcing, we reviewed existing hospital IPC program resourcing in Victoria, Australia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. A voluntary survey was distributed to IPC program leads in Victorian hospitals. Data were collected on hospital characteristics (acute bed numbers, services), IPC program staffing (roles, experience, full-time equivalent [FTE]), and program portfolio. Anonymized responses were analyzed by sector and bed size.

Results: Overall, 113 facilities responded, corresponding to 45% of Victorian hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 200 beds reported that IPC programs had a median FTE per 100 acute beds of 1.6, compared to hospitals in the small (50-99 beds) and medium (100-199) categories, which reported 0.8 and 0.5 FTE, respectively. Median FTE per 100 acute beds was higher in public (3.2) than private (0.4) hospitals. Public hospitals had larger teams and more experienced IPC staff than private hospitals.

Conclusions: Differences in IPC program resourcing are evident in Victorian hospitals, when assessed by sector and bed size. With increasing demands on IPC programs, an understanding of current resourcing assists in future workforce planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信