多视角下老年患者呼吸误吸风险管理的障碍与改善:一项定性研究。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Shuojin Fu, Yanling Wang, Ruifu Kang, Ling Tong, Shuai Jin, Chunhong Li, Qian Xiao, Yaqin Zhang
{"title":"多视角下老年患者呼吸误吸风险管理的障碍与改善:一项定性研究。","authors":"Shuojin Fu, Yanling Wang, Ruifu Kang, Ling Tong, Shuai Jin, Chunhong Li, Qian Xiao, Yaqin Zhang","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aspiration, the entry of food, fluids, saliva or gastric contents into the airway, is common in older adults and may lead to pneumonia or even death. Multidisciplinary management has the opportunity to help prevent aspiration in older patients. However, implementation in clinical practice remains problematic. By investigating the perspectives of stakeholders, comprehensive barriers and improvements measures can be identified to help manage aspiration risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Doctors, therapists, nurses, patients and their caregivers were recruited from wards in three tertiary hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore participants' views and experiences on the implementation of aspiration risk management. Data were analysed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 62 participants revealed barriers and improvements measures in aspiration risk management in older patients: Barriers: (i) Patient-related barriers, related to cognition, physical condition, compliance and caregiver burden; (ii) Healthcare-related barriers, including insufficient professional competence, lack of personalised guidance and education and limited communication; (iii) Support system and environmental barriers, including insufficient collaboration, limited processes, insufficient technical support and uneven hospital management attention. Improvements measures: (i) Hybrid management model of online and offline integration; (ii) Clear role definition across multiple roles; (iii) Visualization or quantification of aspiration display; (iv) Personalised and dynamic aspiration management strategies; (v) Strengthening communication and trust to improve adherence; (vi) Emotional support and supervision by caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All major stakeholders faced some challenges, and it was necessary to strengthen teamwork, make good use of new technology support and enhance humanistic care to help stakeholders manage aspiration risk in older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and improvements of respiratory aspiration risk management in older patients from multiple perspectives: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Shuojin Fu, Yanling Wang, Ruifu Kang, Ling Tong, Shuai Jin, Chunhong Li, Qian Xiao, Yaqin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aspiration, the entry of food, fluids, saliva or gastric contents into the airway, is common in older adults and may lead to pneumonia or even death. Multidisciplinary management has the opportunity to help prevent aspiration in older patients. However, implementation in clinical practice remains problematic. By investigating the perspectives of stakeholders, comprehensive barriers and improvements measures can be identified to help manage aspiration risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Doctors, therapists, nurses, patients and their caregivers were recruited from wards in three tertiary hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore participants' views and experiences on the implementation of aspiration risk management. Data were analysed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 62 participants revealed barriers and improvements measures in aspiration risk management in older patients: Barriers: (i) Patient-related barriers, related to cognition, physical condition, compliance and caregiver burden; (ii) Healthcare-related barriers, including insufficient professional competence, lack of personalised guidance and education and limited communication; (iii) Support system and environmental barriers, including insufficient collaboration, limited processes, insufficient technical support and uneven hospital management attention. Improvements measures: (i) Hybrid management model of online and offline integration; (ii) Clear role definition across multiple roles; (iii) Visualization or quantification of aspiration display; (iv) Personalised and dynamic aspiration management strategies; (v) Strengthening communication and trust to improve adherence; (vi) Emotional support and supervision by caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All major stakeholders faced some challenges, and it was necessary to strengthen teamwork, make good use of new technology support and enhance humanistic care to help stakeholders manage aspiration risk in older patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"54 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf256\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:误吸是指食物、液体、唾液或胃内容物进入气道,在老年人中很常见,可能导致肺炎甚至死亡。多学科管理有机会帮助预防老年患者误吸。然而,在临床实践中的实施仍然存在问题。通过调查利益相关者的观点,可以确定全面的障碍和改进措施,以帮助管理期望风险。方法:从三所三级医院的病区招募医生、治疗师、护士、患者及其护理人员。我们进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨参与者对实施期望风险管理的看法和经验。数据采用内容分析法进行分析。结果:来自62名参与者的数据揭示了老年患者吸入风险管理的障碍和改进措施:障碍:(i)与患者相关的障碍,与认知、身体状况、依从性和护理人员负担有关;㈡与保健有关的障碍,包括专业能力不足、缺乏个性化指导和教育以及沟通有限;(三)支持系统和环境障碍,包括协作不足、流程有限、技术支持不足和医院管理重视不均衡。改进措施:(一)线上线下一体化的混合管理模式;明确界定跨多种角色的角色;(iii)可视化或量化吸进显示;个人化和动态的抱负管理策略;加强沟通和信任以改善遵守情况;照顾者的情感支持和监督。结论:各主要利益相关者面临一定挑战,需要加强团队合作,利用好新技术支持,加强人文关怀,帮助利益相关者管理老年患者误吸风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and improvements of respiratory aspiration risk management in older patients from multiple perspectives: a qualitative study.

Background: Aspiration, the entry of food, fluids, saliva or gastric contents into the airway, is common in older adults and may lead to pneumonia or even death. Multidisciplinary management has the opportunity to help prevent aspiration in older patients. However, implementation in clinical practice remains problematic. By investigating the perspectives of stakeholders, comprehensive barriers and improvements measures can be identified to help manage aspiration risk.

Method: Doctors, therapists, nurses, patients and their caregivers were recruited from wards in three tertiary hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore participants' views and experiences on the implementation of aspiration risk management. Data were analysed using content analysis.

Results: Data from 62 participants revealed barriers and improvements measures in aspiration risk management in older patients: Barriers: (i) Patient-related barriers, related to cognition, physical condition, compliance and caregiver burden; (ii) Healthcare-related barriers, including insufficient professional competence, lack of personalised guidance and education and limited communication; (iii) Support system and environmental barriers, including insufficient collaboration, limited processes, insufficient technical support and uneven hospital management attention. Improvements measures: (i) Hybrid management model of online and offline integration; (ii) Clear role definition across multiple roles; (iii) Visualization or quantification of aspiration display; (iv) Personalised and dynamic aspiration management strategies; (v) Strengthening communication and trust to improve adherence; (vi) Emotional support and supervision by caregivers.

Conclusion: All major stakeholders faced some challenges, and it was necessary to strengthen teamwork, make good use of new technology support and enhance humanistic care to help stakeholders manage aspiration risk in older patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信