Ananta P Handono, Joanne Ryan, Fajar Setiawan, Sara E Espinoza, Aung Zaw Zaw Phyo, Chao Zhu, Mark R Nelson, Michael E Ernst, Suzanne G Orchard, Rory Wolfe, Robyn Woods, Peng Qiu, Zhen Zhou
{"title":"低剂量阿司匹林对老年体弱前期和体弱成人逆转虚弱状态的影响:对ASPREE随机临床试验的二次分析","authors":"Ananta P Handono, Joanne Ryan, Fajar Setiawan, Sara E Espinoza, Aung Zaw Zaw Phyo, Chao Zhu, Mark R Nelson, Michael E Ernst, Suzanne G Orchard, Rory Wolfe, Robyn Woods, Peng Qiu, Zhen Zhou","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low-grade inflammation is hypothesised as a central driver of frailty. This study aims to evaluate whether low-dose aspirin can reverse frailty status among initially prefrail/frail older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomised, placebo-controlled trial, involving community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years. The median (Interquartile range) follow-up was 4.7 (3.6-5.7) years. We included participants who were prefrail or frail at baseline, with frailty assessed using two validated measures: the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the Deficit-Accumulation Frailty Index (FI). Frailty reversal was defined as a transition to a less severe state (from frail to prefrail/nonfrail, prefrail to nonfrail). The discrete-time survival model was used for outcome analysis; linear mixed-effects models compared longitudinal frailty trajectories between the treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6595 and 8766 participants included in the FFP and FI analyses, respectively, there was no significant difference in frailty status reversal between aspirin and placebo groups (FFP-HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.07; FI-HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.07). No significant difference was found in the change of FFP counts (β = 0.014, SE = 0.007, P = .06) and FI score (β = 0.0004, SE = 0.004, P = .37) between the aspirin and placebo groups over time, suggesting that aspirin neither reversed nor worsened frailty severity. Subgroup analyses revealed no effect modification by frailty risk factors such as age, sex, race and medical history.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose aspirin has no effect in reversing frailty among prefrail and frail individuals. The findings highlight the need to explore alternative anti-inflammatory medications for frailty management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of low-dose aspirin on reversing frailty status in older prefrail and frail adults: a secondary analysis of the ASPREE randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ananta P Handono, Joanne Ryan, Fajar Setiawan, Sara E Espinoza, Aung Zaw Zaw Phyo, Chao Zhu, Mark R Nelson, Michael E Ernst, Suzanne G Orchard, Rory Wolfe, Robyn Woods, Peng Qiu, Zhen Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low-grade inflammation is hypothesised as a central driver of frailty. This study aims to evaluate whether low-dose aspirin can reverse frailty status among initially prefrail/frail older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomised, placebo-controlled trial, involving community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years. The median (Interquartile range) follow-up was 4.7 (3.6-5.7) years. We included participants who were prefrail or frail at baseline, with frailty assessed using two validated measures: the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the Deficit-Accumulation Frailty Index (FI). Frailty reversal was defined as a transition to a less severe state (from frail to prefrail/nonfrail, prefrail to nonfrail). The discrete-time survival model was used for outcome analysis; linear mixed-effects models compared longitudinal frailty trajectories between the treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6595 and 8766 participants included in the FFP and FI analyses, respectively, there was no significant difference in frailty status reversal between aspirin and placebo groups (FFP-HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.07; FI-HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.07). No significant difference was found in the change of FFP counts (β = 0.014, SE = 0.007, P = .06) and FI score (β = 0.0004, SE = 0.004, P = .37) between the aspirin and placebo groups over time, suggesting that aspirin neither reversed nor worsened frailty severity. Subgroup analyses revealed no effect modification by frailty risk factors such as age, sex, race and medical history.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose aspirin has no effect in reversing frailty among prefrail and frail individuals. The findings highlight the need to explore alternative anti-inflammatory medications for frailty management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"54 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12461696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf271\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性低度炎症被假设为虚弱的主要驱动因素。本研究旨在评估低剂量阿司匹林是否可以逆转最初虚弱/虚弱的老年人的虚弱状态。方法:这是一项针对阿司匹林减少老年人事件(ASPREE)的事后亚组分析,这是一项随机、安慰剂对照试验,涉及年龄≥65岁的社区居民。中位(四分位间距)随访时间为4.7(3.6-5.7)年。我们纳入了在基线时体弱或体弱的参与者,使用两种经过验证的方法来评估脆弱性:Fried脆弱表型(FFP)和赤字积累脆弱指数(FI)。虚弱逆转被定义为过渡到较不严重的状态(从虚弱到虚弱/非虚弱,虚弱到非虚弱)。结果分析采用离散时间生存模型;线性混合效应模型比较了治疗组之间的纵向衰弱轨迹。结果:分别纳入FFP和FI分析的6595和8766名受试者中,阿司匹林组和安慰剂组在衰弱状态逆转方面无显著差异(FFP- hr: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.07; FI- hr: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.07)。两组间FFP计数变化差异无统计学意义(β = 0.014, SE = 0.007, P = 0.05)。6)和FI评分(β = 0.0004, SE = 0.004, P = 0.05)。37)阿司匹林组和安慰剂组之间的差异,表明阿司匹林既没有逆转也没有加重虚弱的严重程度。亚组分析显示,年龄、性别、种族和病史等脆弱危险因素没有影响。结论:小剂量阿司匹林在体弱前期和体弱个体中没有逆转虚弱的作用。研究结果强调了探索替代抗炎药物治疗虚弱的必要性。
The effect of low-dose aspirin on reversing frailty status in older prefrail and frail adults: a secondary analysis of the ASPREE randomised clinical trial.
Background: Chronic low-grade inflammation is hypothesised as a central driver of frailty. This study aims to evaluate whether low-dose aspirin can reverse frailty status among initially prefrail/frail older adults.
Methods: This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomised, placebo-controlled trial, involving community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years. The median (Interquartile range) follow-up was 4.7 (3.6-5.7) years. We included participants who were prefrail or frail at baseline, with frailty assessed using two validated measures: the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the Deficit-Accumulation Frailty Index (FI). Frailty reversal was defined as a transition to a less severe state (from frail to prefrail/nonfrail, prefrail to nonfrail). The discrete-time survival model was used for outcome analysis; linear mixed-effects models compared longitudinal frailty trajectories between the treatment arms.
Results: Among 6595 and 8766 participants included in the FFP and FI analyses, respectively, there was no significant difference in frailty status reversal between aspirin and placebo groups (FFP-HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.07; FI-HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.07). No significant difference was found in the change of FFP counts (β = 0.014, SE = 0.007, P = .06) and FI score (β = 0.0004, SE = 0.004, P = .37) between the aspirin and placebo groups over time, suggesting that aspirin neither reversed nor worsened frailty severity. Subgroup analyses revealed no effect modification by frailty risk factors such as age, sex, race and medical history.
Conclusion: Low-dose aspirin has no effect in reversing frailty among prefrail and frail individuals. The findings highlight the need to explore alternative anti-inflammatory medications for frailty management.
期刊介绍:
Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.