3164例接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的糖尿病患者的单动脉与多动脉移植:倾向匹配分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Albaraa Al-Holy, Maria Comanici, Anonna Das, Nandor Marczin, Sunil Kishore Bhudia, Shahzad Gull Raja
{"title":"3164例接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的糖尿病患者的单动脉与多动脉移植:倾向匹配分析。","authors":"Albaraa Al-Holy, Maria Comanici, Anonna Das, Nandor Marczin, Sunil Kishore Bhudia, Shahzad Gull Raja","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, yet the role of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) remains underutilized and understudied in this population. The objective of this study was to evaluate short-term safety and long-term survival outcomes of MAG compared with single arterial grafting (SAG) in diabetic patients, using a propensity-matched design. This retrospective single center study included 3,164 diabetic patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 1996 and September 2023, stratified by graft strategy: SAG (n = 2,499) and MAG (n = 665). Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline differences, yielding 662 matched pairs. In the unmatched cohort, MAG was associated with a significantly higher number of grafts and a greater rate of deep sternal wound infection (3.0% vs 1.7%; p = .028), while 30-day mortality was comparable (2.7% vs 2.8%; p = .939). In the matched cohort, short-term outcomes did not differ significantly between groups (p > .3 for all). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed comparable survival (p = .954) at 1 year (92% vs 91%), 5 years (85% vs 83%), 10 years (73% vs 73%), 15 years (57% vs 62%), and 20 years (44% vs 41%). Multivariate Cox regression identified age, female sex, New York Heart Association class, prior cardiac surgery, reduced ventricular function, and disease extent as independent predictors of mortality. In conclusion, these findings suggest that MAG can be safely offered to diabetic patients, though its long-term survival benefit remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single Arterial versus Multiple Arterial Grafting in 3,164 Diabetic Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Albaraa Al-Holy, Maria Comanici, Anonna Das, Nandor Marczin, Sunil Kishore Bhudia, Shahzad Gull Raja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, yet the role of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) remains underutilized and understudied in this population. The objective of this study was to evaluate short-term safety and long-term survival outcomes of MAG compared with single arterial grafting (SAG) in diabetic patients, using a propensity-matched design. This retrospective single center study included 3,164 diabetic patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 1996 and September 2023, stratified by graft strategy: SAG (n = 2,499) and MAG (n = 665). Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline differences, yielding 662 matched pairs. In the unmatched cohort, MAG was associated with a significantly higher number of grafts and a greater rate of deep sternal wound infection (3.0% vs 1.7%; p = .028), while 30-day mortality was comparable (2.7% vs 2.8%; p = .939). In the matched cohort, short-term outcomes did not differ significantly between groups (p > .3 for all). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed comparable survival (p = .954) at 1 year (92% vs 91%), 5 years (85% vs 83%), 10 years (73% vs 73%), 15 years (57% vs 62%), and 20 years (44% vs 41%). Multivariate Cox regression identified age, female sex, New York Heart Association class, prior cardiac surgery, reduced ventricular function, and disease extent as independent predictors of mortality. In conclusion, these findings suggest that MAG can be safely offered to diabetic patients, though its long-term survival benefit remains uncertain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病患者接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的不良后果风险增加,但多动脉移植(MAG)的作用在这一人群中仍未得到充分利用和研究。本研究的目的是采用倾向匹配设计,评估MAG与单动脉移植(SAG)在糖尿病患者中的短期安全性和长期生存结果。这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了3164例1996年1月至2023年9月间行孤立性冠状动脉搭桥的糖尿病患者,按移植物策略分层:SAG (n = 2499)和MAG (n = 665)。倾向评分匹配用于平衡基线差异,得到662对匹配。在未匹配的队列中,MAG与更高的移植物数量和更高的胸骨深伤口感染率相关(3.0% vs 1.7%; p = )。028),而30天死亡率具有可比性(2.7% vs 2.8%; p = .939)。在匹配的队列中,两组之间的短期结果没有显著差异(p < 0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存估计显示1年(92%对91%)、5年(85%对83%)、10年(73%对73%)、15年(57%对62%)和20年(44%对41%)的可比生存率(p = .954)。多变量Cox回归发现,年龄、女性、纽约心脏协会分级、既往心脏手术、心室功能降低和疾病程度是死亡率的独立预测因素。总之,这些发现表明,MAG可以安全地提供给糖尿病患者,尽管其长期生存效益仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single Arterial versus Multiple Arterial Grafting in 3,164 Diabetic Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, yet the role of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) remains underutilized and understudied in this population. The objective of this study was to evaluate short-term safety and long-term survival outcomes of MAG compared with single arterial grafting (SAG) in diabetic patients, using a propensity-matched design. This retrospective single center study included 3,164 diabetic patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 1996 and September 2023, stratified by graft strategy: SAG (n = 2,499) and MAG (n = 665). Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline differences, yielding 662 matched pairs. In the unmatched cohort, MAG was associated with a significantly higher number of grafts and a greater rate of deep sternal wound infection (3.0% vs 1.7%; p = .028), while 30-day mortality was comparable (2.7% vs 2.8%; p = .939). In the matched cohort, short-term outcomes did not differ significantly between groups (p > .3 for all). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed comparable survival (p = .954) at 1 year (92% vs 91%), 5 years (85% vs 83%), 10 years (73% vs 73%), 15 years (57% vs 62%), and 20 years (44% vs 41%). Multivariate Cox regression identified age, female sex, New York Heart Association class, prior cardiac surgery, reduced ventricular function, and disease extent as independent predictors of mortality. In conclusion, these findings suggest that MAG can be safely offered to diabetic patients, though its long-term survival benefit remains uncertain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信