急性心肌梗死诊断与治疗的性别差异。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mary T Imboden, Erin Koltner, Jane H Bryant, Adrienne Jones, Renee C Swanson, Lori M Tam, Kevin J Woolf
{"title":"急性心肌梗死诊断与治疗的性别差异。","authors":"Mary T Imboden, Erin Koltner, Jane H Bryant, Adrienne Jones, Renee C Swanson, Lori M Tam, Kevin J Woolf","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to assess sex differences in timely diagnosis (time-to-ECG) and treatment (time-to-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients utilizing a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 1098 STEMI (306 females and 792 males) and 2,179 NSTEMI (747 females, 1432 males) patients that presented to 2 urban EDs between January 2022 and December 2024 was performed. Sex differences in time-to-ECG were assessed in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients, whereas differences in time-to-PCI were assessed in STEMI patients only. Time-to-ECG and time-to-PCI were compared continuously, as well as categorically (ECG delay = time-to-ECG > 10 min and PCI delay = time-to-PCI > 90 min or >120 min when a transfer occurred). Median time-to-ECG was 3.0 min shorter for male STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Males also had a reduced likelihood of an ECG delay (OR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.51 - 0.82]). Sex disparities remained when assessing only patients with a chief complaint of chest pain (OR:0.74 [95% CI: 0.56 - 0.97]). Male STEMI patients also had a shorter wait time for PCI compared to females (walk-in: 1:26:00 vs. 1:41:00, transfer: 2:19:30 vs. 2:44:30, respectively). However, sex was not a significant predictor of PCI delay after controlling for time-to-ECG. In conclusion, sex disparities were found in time-to-ECG for STEMI and NSTEMI patents, as well as time-to-PCI for STEMI patients. However, sex was not significantly associated with PCI delay after controlling for time-to-ECG. This highlights the importance of timely diagnosis to ensure timely revascularization in acute myocardial infarction patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis and Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Mary T Imboden, Erin Koltner, Jane H Bryant, Adrienne Jones, Renee C Swanson, Lori M Tam, Kevin J Woolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study sought to assess sex differences in timely diagnosis (time-to-ECG) and treatment (time-to-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients utilizing a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 1098 STEMI (306 females and 792 males) and 2,179 NSTEMI (747 females, 1432 males) patients that presented to 2 urban EDs between January 2022 and December 2024 was performed. Sex differences in time-to-ECG were assessed in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients, whereas differences in time-to-PCI were assessed in STEMI patients only. Time-to-ECG and time-to-PCI were compared continuously, as well as categorically (ECG delay = time-to-ECG > 10 min and PCI delay = time-to-PCI > 90 min or >120 min when a transfer occurred). Median time-to-ECG was 3.0 min shorter for male STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Males also had a reduced likelihood of an ECG delay (OR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.51 - 0.82]). Sex disparities remained when assessing only patients with a chief complaint of chest pain (OR:0.74 [95% CI: 0.56 - 0.97]). Male STEMI patients also had a shorter wait time for PCI compared to females (walk-in: 1:26:00 vs. 1:41:00, transfer: 2:19:30 vs. 2:44:30, respectively). However, sex was not a significant predictor of PCI delay after controlling for time-to-ECG. In conclusion, sex disparities were found in time-to-ECG for STEMI and NSTEMI patents, as well as time-to-PCI for STEMI patients. However, sex was not significantly associated with PCI delay after controlling for time-to-ECG. This highlights the importance of timely diagnosis to ensure timely revascularization in acute myocardial infarction patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非STEMI (NSTEMI)患者在及时诊断(ecg时间)和治疗(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间)方面的性别差异,利用回顾性横断面分析1098例STEMI(306例女性和792例男性)和2179例NSTEMI(747例女性,1432例男性)患者,这些患者于2022年1月至2024年12月期间在2个城市急诊科就诊。在STEMI和NSTEMI患者中评估了到ecg时间的性别差异,而在STEMI患者中仅评估了到pci时间的差异。连续比较到ECG时间和到PCI时间,并分类比较(发生转移时,ECG延迟 = 到ECG时间> 10分钟,PCI延迟 = 到PCI时间> 90分钟或>120分钟)。男性STEMI和非STEMI患者到ecg的中位时间短3.0分钟。男性出现心电图延迟的可能性也较低(OR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.51 - 0.82])。当仅评估主诉为胸痛的患者时,性别差异仍然存在(OR:0.74 [95% CI: 0.56 - 0.97])。男性STEMI患者的PCI等待时间也比女性短(分别为走进:1:26:00 vs. 1:41:00,转院:2:19:30 vs. 2:44:30)。然而,在控制到ecg的时间后,性别并不是PCI延迟的显著预测因子。总之,STEMI和NSTEMI专利的到ecg时间以及STEMI患者的到pci时间存在性别差异。然而,在控制到ecg的时间后,性别与PCI延迟没有显著相关。这突出了及时诊断以确保急性心肌梗死患者及时血运重建的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Diagnosis and Treatment.

This study sought to assess sex differences in timely diagnosis (time-to-ECG) and treatment (time-to-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients utilizing a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 1098 STEMI (306 females and 792 males) and 2,179 NSTEMI (747 females, 1432 males) patients that presented to 2 urban EDs between January 2022 and December 2024 was performed. Sex differences in time-to-ECG were assessed in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients, whereas differences in time-to-PCI were assessed in STEMI patients only. Time-to-ECG and time-to-PCI were compared continuously, as well as categorically (ECG delay = time-to-ECG > 10 min and PCI delay = time-to-PCI > 90 min or >120 min when a transfer occurred). Median time-to-ECG was 3.0 min shorter for male STEMI and NSTEMI patients. Males also had a reduced likelihood of an ECG delay (OR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.51 - 0.82]). Sex disparities remained when assessing only patients with a chief complaint of chest pain (OR:0.74 [95% CI: 0.56 - 0.97]). Male STEMI patients also had a shorter wait time for PCI compared to females (walk-in: 1:26:00 vs. 1:41:00, transfer: 2:19:30 vs. 2:44:30, respectively). However, sex was not a significant predictor of PCI delay after controlling for time-to-ECG. In conclusion, sex disparities were found in time-to-ECG for STEMI and NSTEMI patents, as well as time-to-PCI for STEMI patients. However, sex was not significantly associated with PCI delay after controlling for time-to-ECG. This highlights the importance of timely diagnosis to ensure timely revascularization in acute myocardial infarction patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信