LGBT与顺性、异性恋者Kessler心理困扰量表(K6)的测量不变性及均数差异

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Anna L Gilmour, Brian A Feinstein, Mark A Whisman
{"title":"LGBT与顺性、异性恋者Kessler心理困扰量表(K6)的测量不变性及均数差异","authors":"Anna L Gilmour, Brian A Feinstein, Mark A Whisman","doi":"10.1177/10731911251376235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) is used as a self-report measure of nonspecific psychological distress. Although research documents higher K6 scores among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals relative to cisgender, heterosexual individuals, measurement invariance of the K6 has not been established between these groups. We used multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to examine factorial invariance of the K6 between 1,765 LGBT and 20,632 cisgender, heterosexual individuals who completed the Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey. The K6 exhibited configural, weak/metric, and strong/scalar measurement invariance between groups, suggesting that it operates equivalently for both groups. We then examined differences in latent mean K6 scores between groups and differences in the percentage of individuals in each group who met a threshold for serious psychological distress (scores ≥ 13). The latent K6 mean and the percentage of individuals who met the threshold for serious psychological distress were both significantly higher for LGBT than for cisgender, heterosexual individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251376235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement Invariance of and Mean Differences on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) for LGBT and Cisgender, Heterosexual Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Anna L Gilmour, Brian A Feinstein, Mark A Whisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911251376235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) is used as a self-report measure of nonspecific psychological distress. Although research documents higher K6 scores among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals relative to cisgender, heterosexual individuals, measurement invariance of the K6 has not been established between these groups. We used multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to examine factorial invariance of the K6 between 1,765 LGBT and 20,632 cisgender, heterosexual individuals who completed the Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey. The K6 exhibited configural, weak/metric, and strong/scalar measurement invariance between groups, suggesting that it operates equivalently for both groups. We then examined differences in latent mean K6 scores between groups and differences in the percentage of individuals in each group who met a threshold for serious psychological distress (scores ≥ 13). The latent K6 mean and the percentage of individuals who met the threshold for serious psychological distress were both significantly higher for LGBT than for cisgender, heterosexual individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911251376235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251376235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251376235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Kessler心理困扰量表(K6)被用作非特异性心理困扰的自我报告测量。尽管研究表明,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT)的K6得分高于异性恋和顺性人,但这些群体之间的K6测量不变性尚未得到证实。我们使用多组验证性因子分析来检验完成幸福感和基本需求调查的1765名LGBT和20632名顺性别、异性恋者之间K6的因子不变性。K6在两组间表现出构型不变性、弱/度量不变性和强/标量不变性,表明它在两组间的作用是等价的。然后,我们检查了各组之间潜在平均K6评分的差异,以及每组中达到严重心理困扰阈值(评分≥13)的个体百分比的差异。LGBT群体的潜在K6均值和达到严重心理困扰阈值的个体比例均显著高于异性恋和异性恋群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement Invariance of and Mean Differences on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) for LGBT and Cisgender, Heterosexual Individuals.

The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) is used as a self-report measure of nonspecific psychological distress. Although research documents higher K6 scores among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals relative to cisgender, heterosexual individuals, measurement invariance of the K6 has not been established between these groups. We used multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to examine factorial invariance of the K6 between 1,765 LGBT and 20,632 cisgender, heterosexual individuals who completed the Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey. The K6 exhibited configural, weak/metric, and strong/scalar measurement invariance between groups, suggesting that it operates equivalently for both groups. We then examined differences in latent mean K6 scores between groups and differences in the percentage of individuals in each group who met a threshold for serious psychological distress (scores ≥ 13). The latent K6 mean and the percentage of individuals who met the threshold for serious psychological distress were both significantly higher for LGBT than for cisgender, heterosexual individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信