区分bvFTD、AD和MCI的记忆缺陷:额叶和内侧颞叶贡献的倾向评分和体积神经影像学分析。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ricardo Félix Morais, Sara Carvalho, Sofia Vedor, Ricardo Pires, Tiago Jesus, Raquel Lemos, Diana Duro, Marisa Lima, Inês Baldeiras, Tiago Gil Oliveira, Isabel Santana
{"title":"区分bvFTD、AD和MCI的记忆缺陷:额叶和内侧颞叶贡献的倾向评分和体积神经影像学分析。","authors":"Ricardo Félix Morais, Sara Carvalho, Sofia Vedor, Ricardo Pires, Tiago Jesus, Raquel Lemos, Diana Duro, Marisa Lima, Inês Baldeiras, Tiago Gil Oliveira, Isabel Santana","doi":"10.1177/10731911251361038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relative contributions of medial temporal lobe (MTL) integrity and frontal lobe functions in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We assessed 300 participants using neuropsychological memory tests-Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised-and MTL volumetry. Propensity score matching examined which subtests were most influenced by frontal functions. Principal component analysis and ridge regression explored the relationship between MTL volumes and memory tests across groups. Significant differences in memory tests and MTL volumes followed the pattern: controls > MCI > bvFTD > AD. AD showed greater impairment than bvFTD in FCSRT Total (<i>p</i> = .013), Retention (<i>p</i> = .016), and Free Recall (<i>p</i> = .009). Correlations between MTL volumes and memory tests were strongest in MCI (<i>r</i> = -.58), followed by AD (<i>r</i> = -.36), controls (<i>r</i> = -.35), and non-significant in bvFTD (<i>r</i> = -.21). After propensity score matching, several group differences were no longer significant, including cued tasks, delayed recall, and retention. These findings support a continuum of frontal and MTL contributions to memory deficits. AD is primarily marked by MTL-related impairments, which are less pronounced in bvFTD. MTL volumetry influence on these memory tests in MCI underscores their utility in detecting subtle MTL-dependent memory dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251361038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating Memory Deficits in bvFTD, AD, and MCI: A Propensity Score and Volumetric Neuroimaging Analysis of Frontal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Félix Morais, Sara Carvalho, Sofia Vedor, Ricardo Pires, Tiago Jesus, Raquel Lemos, Diana Duro, Marisa Lima, Inês Baldeiras, Tiago Gil Oliveira, Isabel Santana\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911251361038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the relative contributions of medial temporal lobe (MTL) integrity and frontal lobe functions in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We assessed 300 participants using neuropsychological memory tests-Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised-and MTL volumetry. Propensity score matching examined which subtests were most influenced by frontal functions. Principal component analysis and ridge regression explored the relationship between MTL volumes and memory tests across groups. Significant differences in memory tests and MTL volumes followed the pattern: controls > MCI > bvFTD > AD. AD showed greater impairment than bvFTD in FCSRT Total (<i>p</i> = .013), Retention (<i>p</i> = .016), and Free Recall (<i>p</i> = .009). Correlations between MTL volumes and memory tests were strongest in MCI (<i>r</i> = -.58), followed by AD (<i>r</i> = -.36), controls (<i>r</i> = -.35), and non-significant in bvFTD (<i>r</i> = -.21). After propensity score matching, several group differences were no longer significant, including cued tasks, delayed recall, and retention. These findings support a continuum of frontal and MTL contributions to memory deficits. AD is primarily marked by MTL-related impairments, which are less pronounced in bvFTD. MTL volumetry influence on these memory tests in MCI underscores their utility in detecting subtle MTL-dependent memory dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911251361038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251361038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251361038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了内侧颞叶(MTL)完整性和额叶功能在行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)、阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)中的相对作用。我们使用神经心理记忆测试对300名参与者进行了评估——自由和线索选择性提醒测试(FCSRT)、简短视觉空间记忆测试修订和MTL容量法。倾向得分匹配检验了哪些子测试最受额叶功能的影响。主成分分析和岭回归探讨了MTL容量与组间记忆测试之间的关系。记忆测试和MTL容量的显著差异遵循以下模式:控制> MCI > bvFTD > AD。在FCSRT Total中,AD比bvFTD表现出更大的损伤(p =。013),保留率(p =。016)和自由召回(p = .009)。MTL容量与记忆测试之间的相关性在MCI中最强(r = - 0.58),其次是AD (r = - 0.36),对照组(r = - 0.35),而在bvFTD中不显著(r = - 0.21)。在倾向得分匹配后,几个组的差异不再显著,包括提示任务、延迟回忆和保留。这些发现支持了额叶和颞叶颞叶对记忆缺陷的连续贡献。AD主要表现为mtl相关的损伤,这在bvFTD中不太明显。MTL容量测定对MCI患者这些记忆测试的影响强调了它们在检测细微的MTL依赖性记忆功能障碍方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiating Memory Deficits in bvFTD, AD, and MCI: A Propensity Score and Volumetric Neuroimaging Analysis of Frontal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions.

This study investigated the relative contributions of medial temporal lobe (MTL) integrity and frontal lobe functions in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We assessed 300 participants using neuropsychological memory tests-Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised-and MTL volumetry. Propensity score matching examined which subtests were most influenced by frontal functions. Principal component analysis and ridge regression explored the relationship between MTL volumes and memory tests across groups. Significant differences in memory tests and MTL volumes followed the pattern: controls > MCI > bvFTD > AD. AD showed greater impairment than bvFTD in FCSRT Total (p = .013), Retention (p = .016), and Free Recall (p = .009). Correlations between MTL volumes and memory tests were strongest in MCI (r = -.58), followed by AD (r = -.36), controls (r = -.35), and non-significant in bvFTD (r = -.21). After propensity score matching, several group differences were no longer significant, including cued tasks, delayed recall, and retention. These findings support a continuum of frontal and MTL contributions to memory deficits. AD is primarily marked by MTL-related impairments, which are less pronounced in bvFTD. MTL volumetry influence on these memory tests in MCI underscores their utility in detecting subtle MTL-dependent memory dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信