英国哮喘患者在全科治疗中应用糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗或二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗的实际疗效比较研究

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ashley Woodcock, John Blakey, Arnaud Bourdin, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Christian Domingo, Alexander Ford, Rosie Hulme, Theo Tritton, Ines Palomares, Sanchayita Sadhu, Arunangshu Biswas, Manish Verma
{"title":"英国哮喘患者在全科治疗中应用糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗或二丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗的实际疗效比较研究","authors":"Ashley Woodcock, John Blakey, Arnaud Bourdin, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Christian Domingo, Alexander Ford, Rosie Hulme, Theo Tritton, Ines Palomares, Sanchayita Sadhu, Arunangshu Biswas, Manish Verma","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03349-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We compared the real-world effectiveness of initiating beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FOR) versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) in a general practice (GP) asthma cohort in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients newly initiating BDP/FOR or FF/VI between 1 December 2015 and 28 February 2019 (index), were selected from anonymised Clinical Practice Research Datalink data. Baseline was < 12 months pre-index with ≤ 12 months follow-up post-index. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years at index, had diagnosed asthma, ≥ 1 FF/VI or BDP/FOR prescription, medical records eligible for linkage to secondary care data and continuous GP-registration ≥ 12 months pre-index. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ≥ 1 fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist, single-inhaler triple or biologic therapy at index were excluded. The primary study outcome was asthma exacerbation rate. Secondary outcomes included medication persistence and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use. Propensity scores were generated for each treatment comparison; inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounding in baseline characteristics between groups, applied to each outcome separately. Analyses considered intercurrent events (ICEs; treatment switching, discontinuation, loss to follow-up, death, rescue medication use).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weighted group standard mean differences showed adequate balance for most covariates. Patients initiating BDP/FOR (n = 46,809) and FF/VI (n = 3773) had numerically similar exacerbation rates per person per year (PPPY) while-on index treatment [measuring outcome until ICE; BDP/FOR, 0.1479 (n = 31,715); FF/VI, 0.1338 (n = 2547); rate ratio 0.9048, p = 0.2841]. Patients continuing uninterrupted index treatment for 12 months had a lower exacerbation rate PPPY for FF/VI [0.0681 (n = 384)] than BDP/FOR [0.1104 (n = 3342); rate ratio, 0.6162 (p = 0.0293)]. For patients initiating FF/VI versus BDP/FOR, treatment persistence was greater [hazard ratio, 0.76 (p < 0.0001)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, patients initiating FF/VI and BDP/FOR had numerically similar exacerbation rates; of the patients continuing 12 months' uninterrupted treatment, the FF/VI group had a lower exacerbation rate versus BDP/FOR. Patients initiating FF/VI were less likely to discontinue treatment than those initiating BDP/FOR.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Comparative Effectiveness Study in Patients with Asthma Initiating Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol or Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate in General Practice in England.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Woodcock, John Blakey, Arnaud Bourdin, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Christian Domingo, Alexander Ford, Rosie Hulme, Theo Tritton, Ines Palomares, Sanchayita Sadhu, Arunangshu Biswas, Manish Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03349-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We compared the real-world effectiveness of initiating beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FOR) versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) in a general practice (GP) asthma cohort in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients newly initiating BDP/FOR or FF/VI between 1 December 2015 and 28 February 2019 (index), were selected from anonymised Clinical Practice Research Datalink data. Baseline was < 12 months pre-index with ≤ 12 months follow-up post-index. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years at index, had diagnosed asthma, ≥ 1 FF/VI or BDP/FOR prescription, medical records eligible for linkage to secondary care data and continuous GP-registration ≥ 12 months pre-index. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ≥ 1 fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist, single-inhaler triple or biologic therapy at index were excluded. The primary study outcome was asthma exacerbation rate. Secondary outcomes included medication persistence and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use. Propensity scores were generated for each treatment comparison; inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounding in baseline characteristics between groups, applied to each outcome separately. Analyses considered intercurrent events (ICEs; treatment switching, discontinuation, loss to follow-up, death, rescue medication use).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weighted group standard mean differences showed adequate balance for most covariates. Patients initiating BDP/FOR (n = 46,809) and FF/VI (n = 3773) had numerically similar exacerbation rates per person per year (PPPY) while-on index treatment [measuring outcome until ICE; BDP/FOR, 0.1479 (n = 31,715); FF/VI, 0.1338 (n = 2547); rate ratio 0.9048, p = 0.2841]. Patients continuing uninterrupted index treatment for 12 months had a lower exacerbation rate PPPY for FF/VI [0.0681 (n = 384)] than BDP/FOR [0.1104 (n = 3342); rate ratio, 0.6162 (p = 0.0293)]. For patients initiating FF/VI versus BDP/FOR, treatment persistence was greater [hazard ratio, 0.76 (p < 0.0001)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, patients initiating FF/VI and BDP/FOR had numerically similar exacerbation rates; of the patients continuing 12 months' uninterrupted treatment, the FF/VI group had a lower exacerbation rate versus BDP/FOR. Patients initiating FF/VI were less likely to discontinue treatment than those initiating BDP/FOR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03349-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03349-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们比较了在英国一个全科医生(GP)哮喘队列中启动双丙酸倍氯米松/富马酸福莫特罗(BDP/FOR)与糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗(FF/VI)的实际有效性。方法:从匿名临床实践研究数据链数据中选择2015年12月1日至2019年2月28日(索引)期间新启动BDP/FOR或FF/VI的患者。基线是2激动剂,单吸入剂,三联或生物治疗在指数被排除。主要研究结果为哮喘加重率。次要结局包括持续用药和口服皮质类固醇(OCS)的使用。为每个治疗比较生成倾向得分;针对组间基线特征的混杂因素调整治疗权重的逆概率,分别应用于每个结果。分析考虑了并发事件(ice、治疗转换、停药、失去随访、死亡、抢救用药)。结果:加权组标准均值差异显示大多数协变量有足够的平衡。开始BDP/FOR治疗(n = 46,809)和FF/VI治疗(n = 3773)的患者在进行指数治疗时,每年每人的加重率(PPPY)数值相似[测量结果直到ICE;BDP/FOR, 0.1479 (n = 31,715);FF/VI, 0.1338 (n = 2547);比率0.9048,p = 0.2841]。持续不间断指数治疗12个月的患者FF/VI加重率PPPY [0.0681 (n = 384)]低于BDP/ for [0.1104 (n = 3342)];比率为0.6162 (p = 0.0293)。对于开始FF/VI与BDP/ For治疗的患者,治疗持续性更高[风险比,0.76 (p)]。结论:总体而言,开始FF/VI和BDP/ For治疗的患者的加重率数值相似;在持续12个月不间断治疗的患者中,FF/VI组的加重率低于BDP/ For。启动FF/VI的患者比启动BDP/FOR的患者更不可能停止治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Comparative Effectiveness Study in Patients with Asthma Initiating Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol or Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate in General Practice in England.

Introduction: We compared the real-world effectiveness of initiating beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FOR) versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) in a general practice (GP) asthma cohort in England.

Methods: Patients newly initiating BDP/FOR or FF/VI between 1 December 2015 and 28 February 2019 (index), were selected from anonymised Clinical Practice Research Datalink data. Baseline was < 12 months pre-index with ≤ 12 months follow-up post-index. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years at index, had diagnosed asthma, ≥ 1 FF/VI or BDP/FOR prescription, medical records eligible for linkage to secondary care data and continuous GP-registration ≥ 12 months pre-index. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ≥ 1 fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist, single-inhaler triple or biologic therapy at index were excluded. The primary study outcome was asthma exacerbation rate. Secondary outcomes included medication persistence and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use. Propensity scores were generated for each treatment comparison; inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounding in baseline characteristics between groups, applied to each outcome separately. Analyses considered intercurrent events (ICEs; treatment switching, discontinuation, loss to follow-up, death, rescue medication use).

Results: Weighted group standard mean differences showed adequate balance for most covariates. Patients initiating BDP/FOR (n = 46,809) and FF/VI (n = 3773) had numerically similar exacerbation rates per person per year (PPPY) while-on index treatment [measuring outcome until ICE; BDP/FOR, 0.1479 (n = 31,715); FF/VI, 0.1338 (n = 2547); rate ratio 0.9048, p = 0.2841]. Patients continuing uninterrupted index treatment for 12 months had a lower exacerbation rate PPPY for FF/VI [0.0681 (n = 384)] than BDP/FOR [0.1104 (n = 3342); rate ratio, 0.6162 (p = 0.0293)]. For patients initiating FF/VI versus BDP/FOR, treatment persistence was greater [hazard ratio, 0.76 (p < 0.0001)].

Conclusion: Overall, patients initiating FF/VI and BDP/FOR had numerically similar exacerbation rates; of the patients continuing 12 months' uninterrupted treatment, the FF/VI group had a lower exacerbation rate versus BDP/FOR. Patients initiating FF/VI were less likely to discontinue treatment than those initiating BDP/FOR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信