{"title":"分配同意:性和性别角色中的强奸神话。","authors":"J L Huck,D R Lee,K N Bowen,J D Spraitz,R Lamphere","doi":"10.1177/08862605251365656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consent is a purposive agreement to engage mutually in specific actions, given freely and without coercion. In the context of sexual interactions, active consent refers to an unambiguous and freely given agreement to participate, absent of any coercion by either party. Conversely, rape myths, stemming from rape culture, are false beliefs and misconceptions about sexual assault that typically frame women as victims and men as perpetrators.. The current study assessed how rape myth disavowal connects to positive perceptions of active consent and how acceptance of active consent practices is mediated by personal context (i.e., gender, personality, and sexual victimization experience) and ideologies (i.e., adherence to socialized sex roles, feminism, and liberalism). The current study utilized a purposive sample of university students (n = 667) from six universities in the United States. Hypotheses were tested using a series of ordinary least squares regression models. Rape Myth disavowal was found to be a significant predictor of active consent controlling for several ideological and personal context variables. Sexual victimization experience was not found to be a significant predictor of active consent.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"16 1","pages":"8862605251365656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allocating Consent: Rape Myths Amid Sex and Gender Roles.\",\"authors\":\"J L Huck,D R Lee,K N Bowen,J D Spraitz,R Lamphere\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251365656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consent is a purposive agreement to engage mutually in specific actions, given freely and without coercion. In the context of sexual interactions, active consent refers to an unambiguous and freely given agreement to participate, absent of any coercion by either party. Conversely, rape myths, stemming from rape culture, are false beliefs and misconceptions about sexual assault that typically frame women as victims and men as perpetrators.. The current study assessed how rape myth disavowal connects to positive perceptions of active consent and how acceptance of active consent practices is mediated by personal context (i.e., gender, personality, and sexual victimization experience) and ideologies (i.e., adherence to socialized sex roles, feminism, and liberalism). The current study utilized a purposive sample of university students (n = 667) from six universities in the United States. Hypotheses were tested using a series of ordinary least squares regression models. Rape Myth disavowal was found to be a significant predictor of active consent controlling for several ideological and personal context variables. Sexual victimization experience was not found to be a significant predictor of active consent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"8862605251365656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251365656\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251365656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Allocating Consent: Rape Myths Amid Sex and Gender Roles.
Consent is a purposive agreement to engage mutually in specific actions, given freely and without coercion. In the context of sexual interactions, active consent refers to an unambiguous and freely given agreement to participate, absent of any coercion by either party. Conversely, rape myths, stemming from rape culture, are false beliefs and misconceptions about sexual assault that typically frame women as victims and men as perpetrators.. The current study assessed how rape myth disavowal connects to positive perceptions of active consent and how acceptance of active consent practices is mediated by personal context (i.e., gender, personality, and sexual victimization experience) and ideologies (i.e., adherence to socialized sex roles, feminism, and liberalism). The current study utilized a purposive sample of university students (n = 667) from six universities in the United States. Hypotheses were tested using a series of ordinary least squares regression models. Rape Myth disavowal was found to be a significant predictor of active consent controlling for several ideological and personal context variables. Sexual victimization experience was not found to be a significant predictor of active consent.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.