经桡动脉远端冠状动脉造影患者桡动脉硬度参数:双工超声研究。

Elton Soydan, Mustafa Akın
{"title":"经桡动脉远端冠状动脉造影患者桡动脉硬度参数:双工超声研究。","authors":"Elton Soydan, Mustafa Akın","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal radial artery (DRA) is a feasible access in coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to determine the stiffness parameters of DRA and main radial artery (MRA) in pre and post-transradial catheterization by using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted for elective distal transradial coronary angiography were consecutively enrolled from September to December 2020. Overall, Duplex analysis was assessed in 100 patients on admission and 24 h post-catheterization. Emerging two MRA occlusion and four DRA occlusion cases were excluded from statistical analysis. As a result, we had 98 measurements in MRA and 96 in the DRA adjusted for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systolic diameter of the DRA was smaller than the MRA as 2.21 ± 0.38 versus 2.38 ± 0.38 mm (p group < 0.001). These increased to 2.4 ± 0.46 and 2.75 ± 0.47 mm, respectively, following catheterization (p group-time = 0.006). Stiffness index of the DRA was higher than the MRA (30.3 ± 26.3 vs. 22.7 ± 25.1 p = 0.601). After catheterization, this parameter significantly increased in the MRA while being preserved in the DRA (p time-group 0.032). Inversely, distensibility showed a decrease in the MRA (p time-group = 0.001) with preservation in the DRA after catheterization (p = 0.422).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DRA is smaller and shows higher stiffness index with lower distensibility than the MRA. Following catheterization, these parameters show preservation in the DRA, despite an impairment in the MRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stiffness Parameters of the Radial Artery in Patients Undergoing Distal Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Duplex Ultrasonography Investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Elton Soydan, Mustafa Akın\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.70211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal radial artery (DRA) is a feasible access in coronary angiography.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to determine the stiffness parameters of DRA and main radial artery (MRA) in pre and post-transradial catheterization by using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted for elective distal transradial coronary angiography were consecutively enrolled from September to December 2020. Overall, Duplex analysis was assessed in 100 patients on admission and 24 h post-catheterization. Emerging two MRA occlusion and four DRA occlusion cases were excluded from statistical analysis. As a result, we had 98 measurements in MRA and 96 in the DRA adjusted for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systolic diameter of the DRA was smaller than the MRA as 2.21 ± 0.38 versus 2.38 ± 0.38 mm (p group < 0.001). These increased to 2.4 ± 0.46 and 2.75 ± 0.47 mm, respectively, following catheterization (p group-time = 0.006). Stiffness index of the DRA was higher than the MRA (30.3 ± 26.3 vs. 22.7 ± 25.1 p = 0.601). After catheterization, this parameter significantly increased in the MRA while being preserved in the DRA (p time-group 0.032). Inversely, distensibility showed a decrease in the MRA (p time-group = 0.001) with preservation in the DRA after catheterization (p = 0.422).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DRA is smaller and shows higher stiffness index with lower distensibility than the MRA. Following catheterization, these parameters show preservation in the DRA, despite an impairment in the MRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:桡动脉远端(DRA)是冠状动脉造影中可行的通道。目的:应用超声技术测定经桡动脉置管前后DRA及桡动脉主干(MRA)的刚度参数。方法:于2020年9月至12月连续入选择期经桡动脉远端冠状动脉造影患者。总体而言,在100例患者入院时和置管后24小时进行双工分析。2例MRA闭塞和4例DRA闭塞排除在统计分析之外。结果,我们在MRA中有98个测量值,在DRA中有96个测量值进行了统计分析。结果:DRA的收缩直径小于MRA,分别为2.21±0.38 mm和2.38±0.38 mm (p组)。结论:DRA比MRA更小,具有更高的刚度指数和更低的扩张性。导管置入后,尽管MRA受损,但这些参数在DRA中显示保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stiffness Parameters of the Radial Artery in Patients Undergoing Distal Transradial Coronary Angiography: A Duplex Ultrasonography Investigation.

Background: Distal radial artery (DRA) is a feasible access in coronary angiography.

Aims: We aimed to determine the stiffness parameters of DRA and main radial artery (MRA) in pre and post-transradial catheterization by using ultrasonography.

Methods: Patients admitted for elective distal transradial coronary angiography were consecutively enrolled from September to December 2020. Overall, Duplex analysis was assessed in 100 patients on admission and 24 h post-catheterization. Emerging two MRA occlusion and four DRA occlusion cases were excluded from statistical analysis. As a result, we had 98 measurements in MRA and 96 in the DRA adjusted for statistical analysis.

Results: Systolic diameter of the DRA was smaller than the MRA as 2.21 ± 0.38 versus 2.38 ± 0.38 mm (p group < 0.001). These increased to 2.4 ± 0.46 and 2.75 ± 0.47 mm, respectively, following catheterization (p group-time = 0.006). Stiffness index of the DRA was higher than the MRA (30.3 ± 26.3 vs. 22.7 ± 25.1 p = 0.601). After catheterization, this parameter significantly increased in the MRA while being preserved in the DRA (p time-group 0.032). Inversely, distensibility showed a decrease in the MRA (p time-group = 0.001) with preservation in the DRA after catheterization (p = 0.422).

Conclusion: DRA is smaller and shows higher stiffness index with lower distensibility than the MRA. Following catheterization, these parameters show preservation in the DRA, despite an impairment in the MRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信