一种新型自固化树脂对硬化牙本质的粘附性评价。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-644020256485
Paulo Henrique Dos Santos Belo Júnior, Thiago Espindola Morais da Silva, Wendell de Sousa Loterio, Gustavo Miranda Rocha, Cesar Dos Reis Perez
{"title":"一种新型自固化树脂对硬化牙本质的粘附性评价。","authors":"Paulo Henrique Dos Santos Belo Júnior, Thiago Espindola Morais da Silva, Wendell de Sousa Loterio, Gustavo Miranda Rocha, Cesar Dos Reis Perez","doi":"10.1590/0103-644020256485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, a self-curing dental composite (Stela) was developed, promising several advantages and indications. One of them includes the restoration of Class V cavities. However, non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) frequently present sclerotic dentin as a substrate for adhesion. Thus, the objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of this material on bovine sclerotic dentin through a shear bond test (SBS), comparing it with a universal self-etching adhesive system with 10-MDP, which is considered to have the best adhesive performance in this situation (Single Bond Universal). In parallel, the effect of airborne-particle abrasion (APA) on the performance of the two adhesive systems was evaluated and whether it affected them differently. Four groups were tested: Stela (S), APA + Stela (APAS), Universal (U), and APA + Universal (APAU), each one with 12 specimens. In addition, the type of fracture and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of representative specimens of the groups were evaluated. Shapiro-Wilk indicated a normal distribution of the data. The results were evaluated using two-way ANOVA, with a significance level of 5%. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the performance of the two adhesives. Additionally, APA increased the adhesive strength of both adhesives, and there was no significant interaction between APA and the two adhesives tested. The results obtained by analyzing the fracture type and SEM also showed a similar pattern. Stela Primer showed SBS values to sclerotic dentin similar to Single Bond Universal.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"e236485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adhesion evaluation of a new self-cured resin to sclerotic dentin.\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Henrique Dos Santos Belo Júnior, Thiago Espindola Morais da Silva, Wendell de Sousa Loterio, Gustavo Miranda Rocha, Cesar Dos Reis Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-644020256485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, a self-curing dental composite (Stela) was developed, promising several advantages and indications. One of them includes the restoration of Class V cavities. However, non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) frequently present sclerotic dentin as a substrate for adhesion. Thus, the objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of this material on bovine sclerotic dentin through a shear bond test (SBS), comparing it with a universal self-etching adhesive system with 10-MDP, which is considered to have the best adhesive performance in this situation (Single Bond Universal). In parallel, the effect of airborne-particle abrasion (APA) on the performance of the two adhesive systems was evaluated and whether it affected them differently. Four groups were tested: Stela (S), APA + Stela (APAS), Universal (U), and APA + Universal (APAU), each one with 12 specimens. In addition, the type of fracture and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of representative specimens of the groups were evaluated. Shapiro-Wilk indicated a normal distribution of the data. The results were evaluated using two-way ANOVA, with a significance level of 5%. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the performance of the two adhesives. Additionally, APA increased the adhesive strength of both adhesives, and there was no significant interaction between APA and the two adhesives tested. The results obtained by analyzing the fracture type and SEM also showed a similar pattern. Stela Primer showed SBS values to sclerotic dentin similar to Single Bond Universal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"e236485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,一种自固化牙科复合材料(Stela)被开发出来,具有许多优点和适应症。其中之一包括修复V类腔体。然而,非龋齿性宫颈病变(ncls)经常出现硬化的牙本质作为粘连的底物。因此,本体外实验的目的是通过剪切粘接试验(SBS)来评价该材料在牛硬化牙本质上的粘接强度,并将其与被认为在这种情况下粘接性能最好的10-MDP通用自蚀刻粘接体系(Single bond universal)进行比较。同时,评估了空气颗粒磨损(APA)对两种胶粘剂体系性能的影响,以及其影响是否不同。试验分为4组:Stela (S)、APA + Stela (APAS)、Universal (U)、APA + Universal (APAU),每组12只标本。此外,对各组代表性标本的断口类型和扫描电镜(SEM)进行了评价。夏皮罗-威尔克指出了数据的正态分布。结果采用双因素方差分析,显著性水平为5%。分析显示两种粘接剂的性能没有统计学上的显著差异。此外,APA增加了两种胶粘剂的粘接强度,APA与两种胶粘剂之间没有显著的相互作用。断口类型分析和扫描电镜分析结果也显示出相似的规律。Stela Primer对硬化牙本质的SBS值与Single Bond Universal相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adhesion evaluation of a new self-cured resin to sclerotic dentin.

Recently, a self-curing dental composite (Stela) was developed, promising several advantages and indications. One of them includes the restoration of Class V cavities. However, non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) frequently present sclerotic dentin as a substrate for adhesion. Thus, the objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of this material on bovine sclerotic dentin through a shear bond test (SBS), comparing it with a universal self-etching adhesive system with 10-MDP, which is considered to have the best adhesive performance in this situation (Single Bond Universal). In parallel, the effect of airborne-particle abrasion (APA) on the performance of the two adhesive systems was evaluated and whether it affected them differently. Four groups were tested: Stela (S), APA + Stela (APAS), Universal (U), and APA + Universal (APAU), each one with 12 specimens. In addition, the type of fracture and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of representative specimens of the groups were evaluated. Shapiro-Wilk indicated a normal distribution of the data. The results were evaluated using two-way ANOVA, with a significance level of 5%. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the performance of the two adhesives. Additionally, APA increased the adhesive strength of both adhesives, and there was no significant interaction between APA and the two adhesives tested. The results obtained by analyzing the fracture type and SEM also showed a similar pattern. Stela Primer showed SBS values to sclerotic dentin similar to Single Bond Universal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信