植物衍生剂对玻璃纤维桩自粘树脂水泥粘结强度的影响。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-644020256465
Bárbara de Fátima Barbosa de Freitas, Italo Hudson Tavares Maia, Tainah Oliveira Rifane, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Diego Lomonaco Vasconcelos de Oliveira, Diego Martins de Paula
{"title":"植物衍生剂对玻璃纤维桩自粘树脂水泥粘结强度的影响。","authors":"Bárbara de Fátima Barbosa de Freitas, Italo Hudson Tavares Maia, Tainah Oliveira Rifane, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Diego Lomonaco Vasconcelos de Oliveira, Diego Martins de Paula","doi":"10.1590/0103-644020256465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of plant-derived compounds, lignin (LIG) and proanthocyanidin (PAC), either alone or in combination with EDTA, as pre-treatments for intraradicular dentin to enhance the push-out bond strength (PBS) of glass fiber posts (GFP) cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Forty-two healthy human single-rooted premolars were prepared for GFP cementation and divided into the following groups based on the dentin pre-treatment: 1) Control: no pre-treatment; 2) EDTA: 17% EDTA; 3) LIG: 2% LIG; 4) PAC: 2% PAC; 5) EDTA-LIG: 17% EDTA + 2% LIG; and 6) EDTA-PAC: 17% EDTA + 2% PAC. All solutions were applied for 60 seconds. The GFPs were subsequently cemented using the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX U200. The roots (n = 7 per group) were sectioned into 1-mm thick discs and subjected to PBS testing after 1 week and 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). After one week, the Control and EDTA-LIG groups (p = 0.092) exhibited similar and high bond strength values compared to the EDTA, LIG, and EDTA-PAC, while the PAC showed the lowest PBS. After six months, the EDTA-LIG maintained its bond strength values (p < 0.001), with no significant differences from the other groups, except for the PAC. In conclusion, the intraradicular dentin pre-treatments exhibited behavior comparable to untreated RelyX U200 cement in the bonding between the fiberglass post and intraradicular dentin, except proanthocyanidin.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"36 ","pages":"e236465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a plant-derived agent on bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement luting of glass-fiber posts.\",\"authors\":\"Bárbara de Fátima Barbosa de Freitas, Italo Hudson Tavares Maia, Tainah Oliveira Rifane, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Diego Lomonaco Vasconcelos de Oliveira, Diego Martins de Paula\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-644020256465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of plant-derived compounds, lignin (LIG) and proanthocyanidin (PAC), either alone or in combination with EDTA, as pre-treatments for intraradicular dentin to enhance the push-out bond strength (PBS) of glass fiber posts (GFP) cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Forty-two healthy human single-rooted premolars were prepared for GFP cementation and divided into the following groups based on the dentin pre-treatment: 1) Control: no pre-treatment; 2) EDTA: 17% EDTA; 3) LIG: 2% LIG; 4) PAC: 2% PAC; 5) EDTA-LIG: 17% EDTA + 2% LIG; and 6) EDTA-PAC: 17% EDTA + 2% PAC. All solutions were applied for 60 seconds. The GFPs were subsequently cemented using the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX U200. The roots (n = 7 per group) were sectioned into 1-mm thick discs and subjected to PBS testing after 1 week and 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). After one week, the Control and EDTA-LIG groups (p = 0.092) exhibited similar and high bond strength values compared to the EDTA, LIG, and EDTA-PAC, while the PAC showed the lowest PBS. After six months, the EDTA-LIG maintained its bond strength values (p < 0.001), with no significant differences from the other groups, except for the PAC. In conclusion, the intraradicular dentin pre-treatments exhibited behavior comparable to untreated RelyX U200 cement in the bonding between the fiberglass post and intraradicular dentin, except proanthocyanidin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"e236465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价植物源性化合物木质素(LIG)和原花青素(PAC)单独或联合EDTA作为根内牙本质预处理对自粘树脂水泥固接玻璃纤维桩(GFP)的推出粘结强度(PBS)的影响。选取健康人单根前磨牙42颗,根据牙本质预处理情况分为两组:1)对照组:未预处理;2) edta: 17% edta;3)光照:2%光照;4) pac: 2% pac;5) edta - light: 17% edta + 2% light;6) EDTA-PAC: 17% EDTA + 2% PAC。所有溶液作用60秒。随后使用自粘树脂水泥RelyX U200对gfp进行胶结。根(每组7根)切成1 mm厚的盘状,分别于1周和6个月后进行PBS检测。统计学分析采用双因素方差分析,后加Tukey检验(p < 0.05)。一周后,与EDTA、LIG和EDTA-PAC相比,Control组和EDTA-LIG组(p = 0.092)表现出相似且较高的结合强度值,而PAC组的PBS最低。6个月后,EDTA-LIG保持其结合强度值(p < 0.001),与其他组没有显著差异(PAC除外)。综上所述,根状牙本质预处理在玻璃纤维桩与根状牙本质之间的结合方面表现出与未处理的RelyX U200水泥相当的行为,除了原花青素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a plant-derived agent on bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement luting of glass-fiber posts.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of plant-derived compounds, lignin (LIG) and proanthocyanidin (PAC), either alone or in combination with EDTA, as pre-treatments for intraradicular dentin to enhance the push-out bond strength (PBS) of glass fiber posts (GFP) cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Forty-two healthy human single-rooted premolars were prepared for GFP cementation and divided into the following groups based on the dentin pre-treatment: 1) Control: no pre-treatment; 2) EDTA: 17% EDTA; 3) LIG: 2% LIG; 4) PAC: 2% PAC; 5) EDTA-LIG: 17% EDTA + 2% LIG; and 6) EDTA-PAC: 17% EDTA + 2% PAC. All solutions were applied for 60 seconds. The GFPs were subsequently cemented using the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX U200. The roots (n = 7 per group) were sectioned into 1-mm thick discs and subjected to PBS testing after 1 week and 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05). After one week, the Control and EDTA-LIG groups (p = 0.092) exhibited similar and high bond strength values compared to the EDTA, LIG, and EDTA-PAC, while the PAC showed the lowest PBS. After six months, the EDTA-LIG maintained its bond strength values (p < 0.001), with no significant differences from the other groups, except for the PAC. In conclusion, the intraradicular dentin pre-treatments exhibited behavior comparable to untreated RelyX U200 cement in the bonding between the fiberglass post and intraradicular dentin, except proanthocyanidin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信