识别不同的服务使用表型跨越自杀和自残水平:英国生物银行的研究。

Biya Tang, Fiona Shand, Helen Christensen, Alexis E Whitton
{"title":"识别不同的服务使用表型跨越自杀和自残水平:英国生物银行的研究。","authors":"Biya Tang, Fiona Shand, Helen Christensen, Alexis E Whitton","doi":"10.1038/s44184-025-00160-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental health service use among individuals experiencing suicidality and self-harm is highly variable, with many individuals not seeking professional help. Using large-scale data from the UK Biobank, this study examined factors predictive of distinct service use phenotypes across varying levels of suicidality and self-harm. Male sex, the absence of psychological distress, and lower severity of suicide risk were the factors most strongly associated with reduced engagement with professional care. Additionally, although use of informal support predicted greater odds of service engagement, the type of support varied depending on suicidality severity: informal therapeutic strategies (e.g. yoga) were linked to service use among lower-risk individuals, whereas use of helplines was most strongly associated with service use among higher-risk individuals (e.g. those with a history of suicide attempts). These findings suggest that tailoring interventions to the unique needs and contexts of different subgroups may improve service engagement among individuals experiencing suicidality and/or self-harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":"4 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying distinct service use phenotypes across levels of suicidality and self-harm: a UK Biobank study.\",\"authors\":\"Biya Tang, Fiona Shand, Helen Christensen, Alexis E Whitton\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44184-025-00160-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mental health service use among individuals experiencing suicidality and self-harm is highly variable, with many individuals not seeking professional help. Using large-scale data from the UK Biobank, this study examined factors predictive of distinct service use phenotypes across varying levels of suicidality and self-harm. Male sex, the absence of psychological distress, and lower severity of suicide risk were the factors most strongly associated with reduced engagement with professional care. Additionally, although use of informal support predicted greater odds of service engagement, the type of support varied depending on suicidality severity: informal therapeutic strategies (e.g. yoga) were linked to service use among lower-risk individuals, whereas use of helplines was most strongly associated with service use among higher-risk individuals (e.g. those with a history of suicide attempts). These findings suggest that tailoring interventions to the unique needs and contexts of different subgroups may improve service engagement among individuals experiencing suicidality and/or self-harm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Npj mental health research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00160-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00160-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有自杀倾向和自残倾向的个人使用心理健康服务的情况差异很大,许多人不寻求专业帮助。利用来自英国生物银行的大规模数据,这项研究检查了在不同水平的自杀和自残中不同服务使用表型的预测因素。男性、没有心理困扰和较低的自杀风险是与较少接受专业护理最密切相关的因素。此外,尽管使用非正式支持预测更大的服务参与几率,但支持的类型因自杀严重程度而异:非正式治疗策略(如瑜伽)与低风险个体的服务使用有关,而求助热线的使用与高风险个体(如有自杀企图史的人)的服务使用关系最为密切。这些发现表明,针对不同亚群体的独特需求和背景量身定制干预措施,可能会提高经历自杀和/或自残的个人的服务参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying distinct service use phenotypes across levels of suicidality and self-harm: a UK Biobank study.

Mental health service use among individuals experiencing suicidality and self-harm is highly variable, with many individuals not seeking professional help. Using large-scale data from the UK Biobank, this study examined factors predictive of distinct service use phenotypes across varying levels of suicidality and self-harm. Male sex, the absence of psychological distress, and lower severity of suicide risk were the factors most strongly associated with reduced engagement with professional care. Additionally, although use of informal support predicted greater odds of service engagement, the type of support varied depending on suicidality severity: informal therapeutic strategies (e.g. yoga) were linked to service use among lower-risk individuals, whereas use of helplines was most strongly associated with service use among higher-risk individuals (e.g. those with a history of suicide attempts). These findings suggest that tailoring interventions to the unique needs and contexts of different subgroups may improve service engagement among individuals experiencing suicidality and/or self-harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信