职业性暴露与过敏性哮喘及肺功能下降的关系数据驱动的方法与不利结果路径特征的挖掘相结合。

IF 4.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2025.1589380
Rob Stierum, Manosij Ghosh, Marjolein Meijerink, Xavier Pinho, Joost Westerhout, Vivi Schlünssen, Anjoeka Pronk, Jolanda van Bilsen
{"title":"职业性暴露与过敏性哮喘及肺功能下降的关系数据驱动的方法与不利结果路径特征的挖掘相结合。","authors":"Rob Stierum, Manosij Ghosh, Marjolein Meijerink, Xavier Pinho, Joost Westerhout, Vivi Schlünssen, Anjoeka Pronk, Jolanda van Bilsen","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2025.1589380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within occupational epidemiology, the establishment of associations between chemical exposures and health outcome, in particular of individual chemicals present in the exposome, is difficult. Epidemiological studies are valuable but may be prone to confounders, or lack detailed exposure characterisation. Rodent studies may suffer from interspecies differences in comparison to humans. Here, we explore if a data driven approach can leverage human relevant mechanistic information to inform presumed associations between chemical exposures and two common respiratory disorders: lung function decline (LFD) and allergic asthma (AA). Using public toxicogenomics datasets, we identified Gene Ontology Bioprocesses (GO BPs) enriched in human respiratory cells, exposed <i>in vitro</i> to either diesel ultrafine particles (UFP) or respiratory sensitisers. In addition, for LFD and AA, GO BPs were curated from Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and Key Events (KEs) extracted from the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Wiki, and DisGeNET, a gene-disease database. Considering the commonality in GO BPs, a clear overlap was observed between GO BPs derived from UFP and LFD (a.o. \"negative -\"/\"positive\" regulation of cell activation,\" \"positive regulation of ion transport,\" \"stem cell proliferation\"). 20 GO BPs were overlapping between sensitisers in combination with AA (e.g., \"responses to xenobiotic stimulus,\" \"response to oxidative stress\" and \"regulation of response to cytokine stimulus\"). For AA, sensitiser concentrations used in in vitro were generally higher compared to equivalent concentrations expected <i>in vivo</i> (from PBK modelling). Yet, the overlapping GO BPs discovered for these endpoints were plausible and aided in providing mechanistic insights. Currently, limitations exist in the approach to infer causality (e.g., data availability, coverage of AOPs, <i>in vitro</i> to <i>in vivo</i> dosimetry issues), however it can inform on the identification of chemicals within the occupational exposome and putative mechanistic linkage with occupational diseases. Finally, the annotated MIEs and KEs for LFD and AA may serve as valuable resource for further AOP developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1589380"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational exposure and its mechanistic link to allergic asthma and lung function decline; a data-driven approach coupled to mining of adverse outcome pathway signatures.\",\"authors\":\"Rob Stierum, Manosij Ghosh, Marjolein Meijerink, Xavier Pinho, Joost Westerhout, Vivi Schlünssen, Anjoeka Pronk, Jolanda van Bilsen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ftox.2025.1589380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Within occupational epidemiology, the establishment of associations between chemical exposures and health outcome, in particular of individual chemicals present in the exposome, is difficult. Epidemiological studies are valuable but may be prone to confounders, or lack detailed exposure characterisation. Rodent studies may suffer from interspecies differences in comparison to humans. Here, we explore if a data driven approach can leverage human relevant mechanistic information to inform presumed associations between chemical exposures and two common respiratory disorders: lung function decline (LFD) and allergic asthma (AA). Using public toxicogenomics datasets, we identified Gene Ontology Bioprocesses (GO BPs) enriched in human respiratory cells, exposed <i>in vitro</i> to either diesel ultrafine particles (UFP) or respiratory sensitisers. In addition, for LFD and AA, GO BPs were curated from Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and Key Events (KEs) extracted from the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Wiki, and DisGeNET, a gene-disease database. Considering the commonality in GO BPs, a clear overlap was observed between GO BPs derived from UFP and LFD (a.o. \\\"negative -\\\"/\\\"positive\\\" regulation of cell activation,\\\" \\\"positive regulation of ion transport,\\\" \\\"stem cell proliferation\\\"). 20 GO BPs were overlapping between sensitisers in combination with AA (e.g., \\\"responses to xenobiotic stimulus,\\\" \\\"response to oxidative stress\\\" and \\\"regulation of response to cytokine stimulus\\\"). For AA, sensitiser concentrations used in in vitro were generally higher compared to equivalent concentrations expected <i>in vivo</i> (from PBK modelling). Yet, the overlapping GO BPs discovered for these endpoints were plausible and aided in providing mechanistic insights. Currently, limitations exist in the approach to infer causality (e.g., data availability, coverage of AOPs, <i>in vitro</i> to <i>in vivo</i> dosimetry issues), however it can inform on the identification of chemicals within the occupational exposome and putative mechanistic linkage with occupational diseases. Finally, the annotated MIEs and KEs for LFD and AA may serve as valuable resource for further AOP developments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1589380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450882/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1589380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1589380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在职业流行病学领域,很难确定化学品接触与健康结果之间的联系,特别是接触物中存在的个别化学品之间的联系。流行病学研究是有价值的,但可能容易出现混杂因素,或缺乏详细的暴露特征。与人类相比,啮齿动物研究可能存在种间差异。在这里,我们探索数据驱动的方法是否可以利用人类相关的机制信息来告知化学品暴露与两种常见呼吸系统疾病:肺功能下降(LFD)和过敏性哮喘(AA)之间的推定关联。利用公共毒物基因组学数据集,我们确定了在体外暴露于柴油超细颗粒(UFP)或呼吸致敏物的人类呼吸细胞中富集的基因本体生物过程(GO bp)。此外,对于LFD和AA, GO bp是从Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Wiki和基因疾病数据库DisGeNET中提取的分子启动事件(MIEs)和关键事件(KEs)中筛选出来的。考虑到氧化石墨烯bp的共性,在UFP和LFD衍生的氧化石墨烯bp之间观察到明显的重叠。“负-”/“正”调节细胞活化,“正调节离子运输”,“干细胞增殖”)。20个氧化石墨烯bp在与AA联合的致敏剂之间重叠(例如,“对异种生物刺激的反应”、“对氧化应激的反应”和“对细胞因子刺激的反应调节”)。对于AA,体外使用的致敏剂浓度通常高于体内预期的等效浓度(来自PBK模型)。然而,在这些端点上发现的重叠GO bp是合理的,并有助于提供机制见解。目前,推断因果关系的方法存在局限性(例如,数据的可得性、AOPs的覆盖范围、体外对体内剂量测定问题),但它可以为确定职业接触范围内的化学品以及假定的与职业病的机制联系提供信息。最后,LFD和AA的注释的MIEs和ke可以作为进一步AOP开发的有价值的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational exposure and its mechanistic link to allergic asthma and lung function decline; a data-driven approach coupled to mining of adverse outcome pathway signatures.

Within occupational epidemiology, the establishment of associations between chemical exposures and health outcome, in particular of individual chemicals present in the exposome, is difficult. Epidemiological studies are valuable but may be prone to confounders, or lack detailed exposure characterisation. Rodent studies may suffer from interspecies differences in comparison to humans. Here, we explore if a data driven approach can leverage human relevant mechanistic information to inform presumed associations between chemical exposures and two common respiratory disorders: lung function decline (LFD) and allergic asthma (AA). Using public toxicogenomics datasets, we identified Gene Ontology Bioprocesses (GO BPs) enriched in human respiratory cells, exposed in vitro to either diesel ultrafine particles (UFP) or respiratory sensitisers. In addition, for LFD and AA, GO BPs were curated from Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) and Key Events (KEs) extracted from the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Wiki, and DisGeNET, a gene-disease database. Considering the commonality in GO BPs, a clear overlap was observed between GO BPs derived from UFP and LFD (a.o. "negative -"/"positive" regulation of cell activation," "positive regulation of ion transport," "stem cell proliferation"). 20 GO BPs were overlapping between sensitisers in combination with AA (e.g., "responses to xenobiotic stimulus," "response to oxidative stress" and "regulation of response to cytokine stimulus"). For AA, sensitiser concentrations used in in vitro were generally higher compared to equivalent concentrations expected in vivo (from PBK modelling). Yet, the overlapping GO BPs discovered for these endpoints were plausible and aided in providing mechanistic insights. Currently, limitations exist in the approach to infer causality (e.g., data availability, coverage of AOPs, in vitro to in vivo dosimetry issues), however it can inform on the identification of chemicals within the occupational exposome and putative mechanistic linkage with occupational diseases. Finally, the annotated MIEs and KEs for LFD and AA may serve as valuable resource for further AOP developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信