无并发症链球菌血流感染的口服抗生素降压治疗。

Jordan M Loomis, Norman Mang, Jessica K Ortwine, Larry S Brown, Bonnie C Prokesch, Wenjing Wei
{"title":"无并发症链球菌血流感染的口服抗生素降压治疗。","authors":"Jordan M Loomis, Norman Mang, Jessica K Ortwine, Larry S Brown, Bonnie C Prokesch, Wenjing Wei","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the role of oral antibiotic stepdown therapy in patients with uncomplicated streptococcal bacteremia. <i>Streptococcus</i> species are known pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs). Traditionally, BSIs were managed with intravenous (IV) antibiotics; however, growing literature supports oral antibiotics in invasive infections including BSIs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with streptococcal bacteremia between September 2019 and September 2021 at an academic safety-net hospital. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients completing treatment with IV antibiotics versus an oral stepdown regimen. The primary outcome, clinical failure, was a composite of BSI recurrence and infection-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture for any <i>Streptococcus</i> species were included. Patients with polymicrobial BSIs or complicated bacteremia were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>155 patients were included, 77 (49.7%) received a course of IV antibiotics and 78 (50.3%) received an oral antibiotic stepdown regimen. Clinical failure was not different between the IV and oral groups (15.6% vs. 15.4%, respectively; OR .99 [95% CI, .41 to 2.35]). No differences were observed in 30-day all-cause mortality. Patients that received oral antibiotics had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay by 6 days (6 vs 12 d, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that an oral stepdown regimen for uncomplicated streptococcal BSIs is associated with similar outcomes compared to IV antibiotics. Furthermore, oral antibiotics may offer reduced length of stay and avoidance of outpatient central line placement in patients with uncomplicated streptococcal BSIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral antibiotic stepdown therapy for uncomplicated streptococcal bloodstream infections.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan M Loomis, Norman Mang, Jessica K Ortwine, Larry S Brown, Bonnie C Prokesch, Wenjing Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.10110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the role of oral antibiotic stepdown therapy in patients with uncomplicated streptococcal bacteremia. <i>Streptococcus</i> species are known pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs). Traditionally, BSIs were managed with intravenous (IV) antibiotics; however, growing literature supports oral antibiotics in invasive infections including BSIs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with streptococcal bacteremia between September 2019 and September 2021 at an academic safety-net hospital. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients completing treatment with IV antibiotics versus an oral stepdown regimen. The primary outcome, clinical failure, was a composite of BSI recurrence and infection-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture for any <i>Streptococcus</i> species were included. Patients with polymicrobial BSIs or complicated bacteremia were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>155 patients were included, 77 (49.7%) received a course of IV antibiotics and 78 (50.3%) received an oral antibiotic stepdown regimen. Clinical failure was not different between the IV and oral groups (15.6% vs. 15.4%, respectively; OR .99 [95% CI, .41 to 2.35]). No differences were observed in 30-day all-cause mortality. Patients that received oral antibiotics had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay by 6 days (6 vs 12 d, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that an oral stepdown regimen for uncomplicated streptococcal BSIs is associated with similar outcomes compared to IV antibiotics. Furthermore, oral antibiotics may offer reduced length of stay and avoidance of outpatient central line placement in patients with uncomplicated streptococcal BSIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估口服抗生素降压治疗在无并发症链球菌菌血症患者中的作用。链球菌是血液感染(bsi)的已知病原体。传统上,bsi是通过静脉注射抗生素治疗的;然而,越来越多的文献支持口服抗生素治疗侵袭性感染,包括bsi。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了一家学术安全网医院2019年9月至2021年9月期间的链球菌菌血症患者。临床结果比较了完成静脉注射抗生素治疗和口服降压方案的患者。临床失败是BSI复发和感染相关再入院的综合结果。患者:包括至少一种链球菌血培养阳性的成年患者。排除多微生物性bsi或合并菌血症患者。结果:纳入155例患者,77例(49.7%)接受了一个疗程的静脉注射抗生素,78例(50.3%)接受了口服抗生素降药方案。静脉注射组和口服组的临床失败率没有差异(分别为15.6%和15.4%);99 [95% ci,。[41 - 2.35])。30天全因死亡率无差异。口服抗生素组患者住院时间明显缩短6天(6天vs 12天,p < 0.01)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与静脉注射抗生素相比,口服降压方案治疗无并发症的链球菌性BSIs与类似的结果相关。此外,口服抗生素可缩短住院时间,避免无并发症链球菌性脑损伤患者门诊中心静脉置管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral antibiotic stepdown therapy for uncomplicated streptococcal bloodstream infections.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the role of oral antibiotic stepdown therapy in patients with uncomplicated streptococcal bacteremia. Streptococcus species are known pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSIs). Traditionally, BSIs were managed with intravenous (IV) antibiotics; however, growing literature supports oral antibiotics in invasive infections including BSIs.

Design: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with streptococcal bacteremia between September 2019 and September 2021 at an academic safety-net hospital. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients completing treatment with IV antibiotics versus an oral stepdown regimen. The primary outcome, clinical failure, was a composite of BSI recurrence and infection-related readmission.

Patients: Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture for any Streptococcus species were included. Patients with polymicrobial BSIs or complicated bacteremia were excluded.

Results: 155 patients were included, 77 (49.7%) received a course of IV antibiotics and 78 (50.3%) received an oral antibiotic stepdown regimen. Clinical failure was not different between the IV and oral groups (15.6% vs. 15.4%, respectively; OR .99 [95% CI, .41 to 2.35]). No differences were observed in 30-day all-cause mortality. Patients that received oral antibiotics had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay by 6 days (6 vs 12 d, p < .01).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that an oral stepdown regimen for uncomplicated streptococcal BSIs is associated with similar outcomes compared to IV antibiotics. Furthermore, oral antibiotics may offer reduced length of stay and avoidance of outpatient central line placement in patients with uncomplicated streptococcal BSIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信