{"title":"利用多元网络元分析:校准贝叶斯复合似然推断。","authors":"Yifei Wang, Lifeng Lin, Yu-Lun Liu","doi":"10.1214/25-ba1511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multivariate network meta-analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for evidence synthesis by incorporating multiple outcomes and treatments. Despite its advantages, this method comes with methodological challenges, such as the issue of unreported within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes, which can lead to biased estimates and misleading conclusions. In this paper, we propose a calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood approach to overcome this limitation. The proposed method eliminates the need for a fully specified likelihood function while allowing for the unavailability of within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes. Additionally, we developed a hybrid Gibbs sampler algorithm along with the Open-Faced Sandwich post-sampling adjustment to enable robust posterior inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we demonstrated that the proposed approach yields unbiased estimates while maintaining coverage probabilities close to the nominal levels. We implemented the proposed method to two real-world network meta-analysis datasets: one comparing treatment procedures for root coverage and the other comparing treatments for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":55398,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploiting Multivariate Network Meta-Analysis: A Calibrated Bayesian Composite Likelihood Inference.\",\"authors\":\"Yifei Wang, Lifeng Lin, Yu-Lun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/25-ba1511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multivariate network meta-analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for evidence synthesis by incorporating multiple outcomes and treatments. Despite its advantages, this method comes with methodological challenges, such as the issue of unreported within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes, which can lead to biased estimates and misleading conclusions. In this paper, we propose a calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood approach to overcome this limitation. The proposed method eliminates the need for a fully specified likelihood function while allowing for the unavailability of within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes. Additionally, we developed a hybrid Gibbs sampler algorithm along with the Open-Faced Sandwich post-sampling adjustment to enable robust posterior inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we demonstrated that the proposed approach yields unbiased estimates while maintaining coverage probabilities close to the nominal levels. We implemented the proposed method to two real-world network meta-analysis datasets: one comparing treatment procedures for root coverage and the other comparing treatments for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bayesian Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bayesian Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/25-ba1511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/25-ba1511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploiting Multivariate Network Meta-Analysis: A Calibrated Bayesian Composite Likelihood Inference.
Multivariate network meta-analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for evidence synthesis by incorporating multiple outcomes and treatments. Despite its advantages, this method comes with methodological challenges, such as the issue of unreported within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes, which can lead to biased estimates and misleading conclusions. In this paper, we propose a calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood approach to overcome this limitation. The proposed method eliminates the need for a fully specified likelihood function while allowing for the unavailability of within-study correlations among treatments and outcomes. Additionally, we developed a hybrid Gibbs sampler algorithm along with the Open-Faced Sandwich post-sampling adjustment to enable robust posterior inference. Through comprehensive simulation studies, we demonstrated that the proposed approach yields unbiased estimates while maintaining coverage probabilities close to the nominal levels. We implemented the proposed method to two real-world network meta-analysis datasets: one comparing treatment procedures for root coverage and the other comparing treatments for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.
期刊介绍:
Bayesian Analysis is an electronic journal of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis. It seeks to publish a wide range of articles that demonstrate or discuss Bayesian methods in some theoretical or applied context. The journal welcomes submissions involving presentation of new computational and statistical methods; critical reviews and discussions of existing approaches; historical perspectives; description of important scientific or policy application areas; case studies; and methods for experimental design, data collection, data sharing, or data mining.
Evaluation of submissions is based on importance of content and effectiveness of communication. Discussion papers are typically chosen by the Editor in Chief, or suggested by an Editor, among the regular submissions. In addition, the Journal encourages individual authors to submit manuscripts for consideration as discussion papers.