Manuela Deodato, Raffaele Sabot, Alessandra Galmonte, Alvisa Palese, Greta Castellini, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Chad Cook, Lia Rodeghiero, Silvia Gianola, Giacomo Rossettini
{"title":"意大利物理治疗师对人工智能聊天机器人的认识、使用和看法:一项在线横断面调查。","authors":"Manuela Deodato, Raffaele Sabot, Alessandra Galmonte, Alvisa Palese, Greta Castellini, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Chad Cook, Lia Rodeghiero, Silvia Gianola, Giacomo Rossettini","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1671521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots are increasingly being integrated into healthcare, but little is known about their role in physiotherapy. This study investigated the knowledge and use, perceived benefits, limits, and barriers of AI Chatbots in the Italian physiotherapy community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and July 2024. Italian physiotherapists, members of the Associazione Italiana di Fisioterapia (AIFI), were invited through mailing lists and social media. Inclusion criteria: AIFI membership, current employment as a physiotherapist, Italian language proficiency, and willingness to participate. A total of 415 out of 2,773 physiotherapists responded (15% response rate); 50.6% were women, and 50.4% had more than 10 years of experience. The survey comprised four sections: (a) respondent characteristics; (b) knowledge and use of AI Chatbots; (c) perception of benefits; and (d) perception of limits and barriers. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 93.3% of physiotherapists had heard of AI Chatbots, but 66.9% had never used them in clinical practice. Among those who had, 11.3% reported a \"positive\" and 14.5% a \"very positive\" experience. Despite limited use, 78% expressed a positive attitude towards future adoption, and 50% considered AI Chatbots potentially helpful in clinical practice. Reported risks included patient self-diagnosis (84.4%), spread of false information (72.1%), and reduced human interaction (64%). Having more than 21 years of experience was significantly associated with a higher frequency of AI Chatbot use (OR: 5.93, <i>p</i> = 0.013). Age was also a significant predictor of use frequency (OR: 1.05, <i>p</i> = 0.013), with older physiotherapists reporting more frequent AI use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Italian physiotherapists acknowledged both opportunities and risks in implementing AI Chatbots. Although current adoption is limited, the overall positive attitude suggests a likely increase in future use. Targeted strategies, including guidelines and educational initiatives, are needed to ensure safe and effective integration into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1671521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, use and perceptions of artificial intelligence Chatbots among Italian physiotherapists: an online cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Deodato, Raffaele Sabot, Alessandra Galmonte, Alvisa Palese, Greta Castellini, Andrea Turolla, Paolo Pillastrini, Chad Cook, Lia Rodeghiero, Silvia Gianola, Giacomo Rossettini\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1671521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots are increasingly being integrated into healthcare, but little is known about their role in physiotherapy. This study investigated the knowledge and use, perceived benefits, limits, and barriers of AI Chatbots in the Italian physiotherapy community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and July 2024. Italian physiotherapists, members of the Associazione Italiana di Fisioterapia (AIFI), were invited through mailing lists and social media. Inclusion criteria: AIFI membership, current employment as a physiotherapist, Italian language proficiency, and willingness to participate. A total of 415 out of 2,773 physiotherapists responded (15% response rate); 50.6% were women, and 50.4% had more than 10 years of experience. The survey comprised four sections: (a) respondent characteristics; (b) knowledge and use of AI Chatbots; (c) perception of benefits; and (d) perception of limits and barriers. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 93.3% of physiotherapists had heard of AI Chatbots, but 66.9% had never used them in clinical practice. Among those who had, 11.3% reported a \\\"positive\\\" and 14.5% a \\\"very positive\\\" experience. Despite limited use, 78% expressed a positive attitude towards future adoption, and 50% considered AI Chatbots potentially helpful in clinical practice. Reported risks included patient self-diagnosis (84.4%), spread of false information (72.1%), and reduced human interaction (64%). Having more than 21 years of experience was significantly associated with a higher frequency of AI Chatbot use (OR: 5.93, <i>p</i> = 0.013). Age was also a significant predictor of use frequency (OR: 1.05, <i>p</i> = 0.013), with older physiotherapists reporting more frequent AI use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Italian physiotherapists acknowledged both opportunities and risks in implementing AI Chatbots. Although current adoption is limited, the overall positive attitude suggests a likely increase in future use. Targeted strategies, including guidelines and educational initiatives, are needed to ensure safe and effective integration into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1671521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12450932/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1671521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1671521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:人工智能(AI)聊天机器人越来越多地融入医疗保健领域,但人们对它们在物理治疗中的作用知之甚少。这项研究调查了意大利物理治疗界对人工智能聊天机器人的了解和使用、感知的好处、限制和障碍。方法:于2024年3月~ 7月进行横断面调查。意大利理疗师是意大利理疗协会(AIFI)的成员,他们通过邮件列表和社交媒体受到了邀请。入选标准:AIFI会员资格,目前从事物理治疗师工作,意大利语熟练程度,并愿意参与。在2,773名物理治疗师中,共有415名作出回应(回应率15%);50.6%是女性,50.4%有10年以上的工作经验。调查包括四个部分:(a)受访者特征;(b)人工智能聊天机器人的知识和使用;(c)对利益的认识;(d)对限制和障碍的认知。描述性统计和多变量logistic回归分析。结果:总体而言,93.3%的物理治疗师听说过AI聊天机器人,但66.9%的物理治疗师从未在临床实践中使用过。在那些有过这种经历的人中,11.3%的人表示“积极”,14.5%的人表示“非常积极”。尽管使用有限,但78%的人对未来的采用持积极态度,50%的人认为人工智能聊天机器人在临床实践中可能有帮助。报告的风险包括患者自我诊断(84.4%)、虚假信息传播(72.1%)和人际互动减少(64%)。拥有超过21年的经验与更高的人工智能聊天机器人使用频率显著相关(OR: 5.93, p = 0.013)。年龄也是使用频率的重要预测因子(OR: 1.05, p = 0.013),年龄较大的物理治疗师报告更频繁地使用人工智能。结论:意大利物理治疗师承认实施人工智能聊天机器人的机遇和风险。虽然目前的采用率有限,但总体上的积极态度表明未来的使用可能会增加。需要有针对性的战略,包括指导方针和教育举措,以确保安全有效地融入临床实践。
Knowledge, use and perceptions of artificial intelligence Chatbots among Italian physiotherapists: an online cross-sectional survey.
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots are increasingly being integrated into healthcare, but little is known about their role in physiotherapy. This study investigated the knowledge and use, perceived benefits, limits, and barriers of AI Chatbots in the Italian physiotherapy community.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and July 2024. Italian physiotherapists, members of the Associazione Italiana di Fisioterapia (AIFI), were invited through mailing lists and social media. Inclusion criteria: AIFI membership, current employment as a physiotherapist, Italian language proficiency, and willingness to participate. A total of 415 out of 2,773 physiotherapists responded (15% response rate); 50.6% were women, and 50.4% had more than 10 years of experience. The survey comprised four sections: (a) respondent characteristics; (b) knowledge and use of AI Chatbots; (c) perception of benefits; and (d) perception of limits and barriers. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.
Results: Overall, 93.3% of physiotherapists had heard of AI Chatbots, but 66.9% had never used them in clinical practice. Among those who had, 11.3% reported a "positive" and 14.5% a "very positive" experience. Despite limited use, 78% expressed a positive attitude towards future adoption, and 50% considered AI Chatbots potentially helpful in clinical practice. Reported risks included patient self-diagnosis (84.4%), spread of false information (72.1%), and reduced human interaction (64%). Having more than 21 years of experience was significantly associated with a higher frequency of AI Chatbot use (OR: 5.93, p = 0.013). Age was also a significant predictor of use frequency (OR: 1.05, p = 0.013), with older physiotherapists reporting more frequent AI use.
Conclusion: Italian physiotherapists acknowledged both opportunities and risks in implementing AI Chatbots. Although current adoption is limited, the overall positive attitude suggests a likely increase in future use. Targeted strategies, including guidelines and educational initiatives, are needed to ensure safe and effective integration into clinical practice.