从溃疡到截肢:糖尿病足溃疡截肢预后模型的系统综述。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-09-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S542262
Xiao-Ran Xie, Ming-Feng Yu, Rong Xu, Yu Liu, Jing Zhang
{"title":"从溃疡到截肢:糖尿病足溃疡截肢预后模型的系统综述。","authors":"Xiao-Ran Xie, Ming-Feng Yu, Rong Xu, Yu Liu, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S542262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically analyze and compare studies on risk prediction models for diabetic foot ulcers progressing to amputation, facilitate clinical decision-making, and provide recommendations for improving modeling strategies in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to January 29, 2025, to identify studies on risk prediction models for diabetic foot ulcers progressing to amputation. After study screening and data extraction, we evaluated bias and applicability using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18 papers comprising 15 development studies and 3 external validation studies. The development studies reported 17 models, while the validation studies externally validated 12 models. The area under the curve of all models ranged from 0.557 to 0.957. The most commonly used predictors were peripheral arterial disease, glycated hemoglobin, infection, Wagner classification, and ulcer depth. All included studies had low concerns regarding applicability but exhibited high risk of bias, primarily due to insufficient events per variable, missing data, inadequate consideration of data complexity, lack of model performance assessment, and absence of internal validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk prediction model research for diabetic foot ulcer progression to amputation remains in its early stages. Future efforts should prioritize prospectively developing and externally validating models with robust performance and low bias, accompanied by rigorous internal validation and transparent reporting. (Funding: Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2022CFB145) and Research Fund of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2023D36)).</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"3099-3111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Ulcer to Amputation: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Amputation.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Ran Xie, Ming-Feng Yu, Rong Xu, Yu Liu, Jing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S542262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically analyze and compare studies on risk prediction models for diabetic foot ulcers progressing to amputation, facilitate clinical decision-making, and provide recommendations for improving modeling strategies in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to January 29, 2025, to identify studies on risk prediction models for diabetic foot ulcers progressing to amputation. After study screening and data extraction, we evaluated bias and applicability using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18 papers comprising 15 development studies and 3 external validation studies. The development studies reported 17 models, while the validation studies externally validated 12 models. The area under the curve of all models ranged from 0.557 to 0.957. The most commonly used predictors were peripheral arterial disease, glycated hemoglobin, infection, Wagner classification, and ulcer depth. All included studies had low concerns regarding applicability but exhibited high risk of bias, primarily due to insufficient events per variable, missing data, inadequate consideration of data complexity, lack of model performance assessment, and absence of internal validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk prediction model research for diabetic foot ulcer progression to amputation remains in its early stages. Future efforts should prioritize prospectively developing and externally validating models with robust performance and low bias, accompanied by rigorous internal validation and transparent reporting. (Funding: Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2022CFB145) and Research Fund of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2023D36)).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3099-3111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S542262\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S542262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统分析比较糖尿病足溃疡发展为截肢的风险预测模型研究,为临床决策提供依据,并为今后研究中改进建模策略提供建议。方法:我们检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library和Clinicaltrials.gov,检索时间从成立到2025年1月29日,以确定糖尿病足溃疡进展为截肢的风险预测模型的研究。经过研究筛选和数据提取,我们使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚和适用性。结果:我们纳入了18篇论文,包括15项发展研究和3项外部验证研究。开发研究报告了17个模型,而验证研究外部验证了12个模型。各模型曲线下面积范围为0.557 ~ 0.957。最常用的预测因子是外周动脉疾病、糖化血红蛋白、感染、Wagner分类和溃疡深度。所有纳入的研究对适用性的关注程度较低,但显示出较高的偏倚风险,主要是由于每个变量的事件不足、缺失数据、对数据复杂性的考虑不足、缺乏模型性能评估和缺乏内部验证。结论:糖尿病足溃疡发展到截肢的风险预测模型研究仍处于早期阶段。未来的努力应该优先考虑具有稳健性能和低偏差的前瞻性开发和外部验证模型,并伴随着严格的内部验证和透明的报告。(资助:湖北省自然科学基金(2022CFB145)和华中科技大学同济医学院同济医院科研基金(2023D36))。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Ulcer to Amputation: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Amputation.

Aim: To systematically analyze and compare studies on risk prediction models for diabetic foot ulcers progressing to amputation, facilitate clinical decision-making, and provide recommendations for improving modeling strategies in future research.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to January 29, 2025, to identify studies on risk prediction models for diabetic foot ulcers progressing to amputation. After study screening and data extraction, we evaluated bias and applicability using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

Results: We included 18 papers comprising 15 development studies and 3 external validation studies. The development studies reported 17 models, while the validation studies externally validated 12 models. The area under the curve of all models ranged from 0.557 to 0.957. The most commonly used predictors were peripheral arterial disease, glycated hemoglobin, infection, Wagner classification, and ulcer depth. All included studies had low concerns regarding applicability but exhibited high risk of bias, primarily due to insufficient events per variable, missing data, inadequate consideration of data complexity, lack of model performance assessment, and absence of internal validation.

Conclusion: Risk prediction model research for diabetic foot ulcer progression to amputation remains in its early stages. Future efforts should prioritize prospectively developing and externally validating models with robust performance and low bias, accompanied by rigorous internal validation and transparent reporting. (Funding: Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2022CFB145) and Research Fund of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2023D36)).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信