用凝血仪和免疫浊度仪检测Covid-19中d-二聚体水平的比较。

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Brazilian Journal of Biology Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1519-6984.291318
S Shoukat, E N G Turchan, T I Budhy, J Nugraha, C Cyuzuzo
{"title":"用凝血仪和免疫浊度仪检测Covid-19中d-二聚体水平的比较。","authors":"S Shoukat, E N G Turchan, T I Budhy, J Nugraha, C Cyuzuzo","doi":"10.1590/1519-6984.291318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Covid is one of the most lethal viruses in the human respiratory system. Previous outbreaks of Covid19 include a severe respiratory problem (SARS) Cov2 and the Middle East (MERS) respiratory syndrome has recently been identified as one of the most serious health risks. D-dimer is a result of fibrin depletion which increases during a large thrombotic dose attributed to the selective activation of fibrinolytic structure. Measuring D-dimer levels is important in identifying and assessing risk of blood clots and related conditions such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This research is of great help to scientists working with new and high standard methods such as Immuno-nephelometer and Coagulometer and the diagnostics machines. Plasma D-dimer levels have demonstrated potential as a prognostic indicator for outcomes in COVID-19 patients. This research aimed to compare D-dimer levels among Covid-19 infected patients at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital using a Coagulometer with an Immuno-Nephelometer. Chest X-rays were performed to confirm active Covid-19 infections and blood samples were collected and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 15 minutes to get plasma. The plasmas were analyzed using immune-nephelometer and coagulometer diagnostic analyzers. The table showed high levels of D-Dimer which were obtained through analyzers which show the mean and median. The examination and the inflammation were worst, and the chest X-ray showed that shortness of breath became severe. This Study is to make a comparison between CS2500 and Architecti1000 by using immune-nephelometer and coagulometer because the data was statistically analyzed by using KAPPA KOHEN analysis. The confidence interval of 95% (α =0.05) was employed and the results were considered statistically significant. The correlation between CS2500 and Architecti1000 were tested by Mann-Whitney Test correlation and correlation coefficient (r) equals to 0.5 was considered as a threshold to decide the degree of correlation between variables. The findings showed a significant difference between in the D- dimers obtained by CS2500 and Architect i1000 (p=0.019). The compared levels of D-dimer obtained by using coagulometer with an immuno-nephelometer in Covid-19 patients were higher D-Dimer Levels as compared to the normal patients. There is also a difference between CS2500 and Architect i1000 by using immuno-nephelometer and coagulometer because Coagulometer is the more accurate method than the Immuno-nephelometer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55326,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","volume":"85 ","pages":"e291318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of D-dimer levels using coagulometer and immuno-nephelometer in Covid-19.\",\"authors\":\"S Shoukat, E N G Turchan, T I Budhy, J Nugraha, C Cyuzuzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1519-6984.291318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Covid is one of the most lethal viruses in the human respiratory system. Previous outbreaks of Covid19 include a severe respiratory problem (SARS) Cov2 and the Middle East (MERS) respiratory syndrome has recently been identified as one of the most serious health risks. D-dimer is a result of fibrin depletion which increases during a large thrombotic dose attributed to the selective activation of fibrinolytic structure. Measuring D-dimer levels is important in identifying and assessing risk of blood clots and related conditions such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This research is of great help to scientists working with new and high standard methods such as Immuno-nephelometer and Coagulometer and the diagnostics machines. Plasma D-dimer levels have demonstrated potential as a prognostic indicator for outcomes in COVID-19 patients. This research aimed to compare D-dimer levels among Covid-19 infected patients at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital using a Coagulometer with an Immuno-Nephelometer. Chest X-rays were performed to confirm active Covid-19 infections and blood samples were collected and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 15 minutes to get plasma. The plasmas were analyzed using immune-nephelometer and coagulometer diagnostic analyzers. The table showed high levels of D-Dimer which were obtained through analyzers which show the mean and median. The examination and the inflammation were worst, and the chest X-ray showed that shortness of breath became severe. This Study is to make a comparison between CS2500 and Architecti1000 by using immune-nephelometer and coagulometer because the data was statistically analyzed by using KAPPA KOHEN analysis. The confidence interval of 95% (α =0.05) was employed and the results were considered statistically significant. The correlation between CS2500 and Architecti1000 were tested by Mann-Whitney Test correlation and correlation coefficient (r) equals to 0.5 was considered as a threshold to decide the degree of correlation between variables. The findings showed a significant difference between in the D- dimers obtained by CS2500 and Architect i1000 (p=0.019). The compared levels of D-dimer obtained by using coagulometer with an immuno-nephelometer in Covid-19 patients were higher D-Dimer Levels as compared to the normal patients. There is also a difference between CS2500 and Architect i1000 by using immuno-nephelometer and coagulometer because Coagulometer is the more accurate method than the Immuno-nephelometer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Biology\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"e291318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.291318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.291318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠病毒是人类呼吸系统中最致命的病毒之一。以前爆发的covid - 19包括严重呼吸道问题(SARS) Cov2和中东呼吸综合征(MERS)呼吸道综合征,最近被确定为最严重的健康风险之一。d -二聚体是纤维蛋白消耗的结果,在大剂量的血栓形成过程中,由于纤维蛋白溶解结构的选择性激活而增加。测量d -二聚体水平对于识别和评估血栓和相关疾病(如深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、肺栓塞(PE)和弥散性血管内凝血(DIC))的风险很重要。本研究对研究免疫浊度计、凝血计和诊断仪器等新的、高标准的方法有很大的帮助。血浆d -二聚体水平已被证明有潜力作为COVID-19患者预后的预后指标。本研究旨在使用带有免疫浊度计的凝血仪比较Soetomo博士综合学术医院Covid-19感染患者的d-二聚体水平。行胸部x光检查,确认新冠肺炎活动性感染,采集血样,1000转/分离心15分钟取血浆。采用免疫浊度计和凝血计诊断分析仪对血浆进行分析。该表显示了高水平的d -二聚体,这是通过分析仪获得的,显示了平均值和中位数。检查和炎症最严重,胸部x光片显示呼吸急促变得严重。本研究使用免疫浊度计和凝血计对CS2500和Architecti1000进行比较,因为数据采用KAPPA KOHEN分析进行统计分析。采用95%的置信区间(α =0.05),认为结果具有统计学意义。CS2500与Architecti1000的相关性采用Mann-Whitney Test correlation进行检验,以相关系数(r) = 0.5作为判定变量间相关程度的阈值。结果显示,CS2500和Architect i1000获得的D-二聚体有显著差异(p=0.019)。与正常患者相比,使用免疫浊度计的凝血仪测得的Covid-19患者d-二聚体水平较高。CS2500和Architect i1000在使用免疫浊度计和凝固计方面也存在差异,因为凝固计比免疫浊度计更精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of D-dimer levels using coagulometer and immuno-nephelometer in Covid-19.

Covid is one of the most lethal viruses in the human respiratory system. Previous outbreaks of Covid19 include a severe respiratory problem (SARS) Cov2 and the Middle East (MERS) respiratory syndrome has recently been identified as one of the most serious health risks. D-dimer is a result of fibrin depletion which increases during a large thrombotic dose attributed to the selective activation of fibrinolytic structure. Measuring D-dimer levels is important in identifying and assessing risk of blood clots and related conditions such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This research is of great help to scientists working with new and high standard methods such as Immuno-nephelometer and Coagulometer and the diagnostics machines. Plasma D-dimer levels have demonstrated potential as a prognostic indicator for outcomes in COVID-19 patients. This research aimed to compare D-dimer levels among Covid-19 infected patients at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital using a Coagulometer with an Immuno-Nephelometer. Chest X-rays were performed to confirm active Covid-19 infections and blood samples were collected and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 15 minutes to get plasma. The plasmas were analyzed using immune-nephelometer and coagulometer diagnostic analyzers. The table showed high levels of D-Dimer which were obtained through analyzers which show the mean and median. The examination and the inflammation were worst, and the chest X-ray showed that shortness of breath became severe. This Study is to make a comparison between CS2500 and Architecti1000 by using immune-nephelometer and coagulometer because the data was statistically analyzed by using KAPPA KOHEN analysis. The confidence interval of 95% (α =0.05) was employed and the results were considered statistically significant. The correlation between CS2500 and Architecti1000 were tested by Mann-Whitney Test correlation and correlation coefficient (r) equals to 0.5 was considered as a threshold to decide the degree of correlation between variables. The findings showed a significant difference between in the D- dimers obtained by CS2500 and Architect i1000 (p=0.019). The compared levels of D-dimer obtained by using coagulometer with an immuno-nephelometer in Covid-19 patients were higher D-Dimer Levels as compared to the normal patients. There is also a difference between CS2500 and Architect i1000 by using immuno-nephelometer and coagulometer because Coagulometer is the more accurate method than the Immuno-nephelometer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
301
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The BJB – Brazilian Journal of Biology® is a scientific journal devoted to publishing original articles in all fields of the Biological Sciences, i.e., General Biology, Cell Biology, Evolution, Biological Oceanography, Taxonomy, Geographic Distribution, Limnology, Aquatic Biology, Botany, Zoology, Genetics, and Ecology. Priority is given to papers presenting results of researches in the Neotropical region. Material published includes research papers, review papers (upon approval of the Editorial Board), notes, book reviews, and comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信