数字五步调查问卷加强报告对β -内酰胺类抗生素过敏的手术患者的标准围手术期预防。

Daniel Röder, Kathrin Eichhorn, Johanna Stoevesandt, Jan Stumpner, Patrick Meybohm, Güzin Surat
{"title":"数字五步调查问卷加强报告对β -内酰胺类抗生素过敏的手术患者的标准围手术期预防。","authors":"Daniel Röder, Kathrin Eichhorn, Johanna Stoevesandt, Jan Stumpner, Patrick Meybohm, Güzin Surat","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most self-reported beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) allergies are inaccurate. This study evaluated a digital tool designed to reassess beta-lactam allergies and enable the use of standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) without the need for prior allergy testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, observational single-center cohort study, a digital five-step questionnaire was utilized during preoperative anesthesia evaluations for surgical patients reporting beta-lactam allergies. The algorithm assessed the likelihood of a beta-lactam allergy and provided recommendations for either standard PAP or the use of an alternative agent. Adherence to the algorithm's recommendations and the incidence of allergic reactions following PAP were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2020 and October 2022, 983 surgical patients reported beta-lactam allergies. Of these, 322 patients (33%) either did not receive anesthesia or did not require PAP. Among the remaining 661 patients, the algorithm recommended standard prophylaxis for 420 (64%). Of these, 262 patients received BLA, resulting in 2 allergic reactions (0.8%; negative predictive value: 99.2%), while 158 received alternative antibiotics contrary to the recommendation, leading to 3 allergic reactions (1.9%). For the 241 patients (36%) in whom the algorithm indicated a high probability of beta-lactam allergy, 197 (82%) received alternative antibiotics with 4 allergic reactions (2%). Forty-four patients (18%) received BLA contrary to the algorithm's recommendation, with no allergic reactions observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The digital five-step algorithm was a simple and effective tool during preoperative assessment, enabling safe administration of standard PAP in 64% of surgical patients with reported beta-lactam allergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital five-step questionnaire to enhance standard perioperative prophylaxis in surgical patients with reported allergy to beta-lactam-antibiotics.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Röder, Kathrin Eichhorn, Johanna Stoevesandt, Jan Stumpner, Patrick Meybohm, Güzin Surat\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.10140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most self-reported beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) allergies are inaccurate. This study evaluated a digital tool designed to reassess beta-lactam allergies and enable the use of standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) without the need for prior allergy testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, observational single-center cohort study, a digital five-step questionnaire was utilized during preoperative anesthesia evaluations for surgical patients reporting beta-lactam allergies. The algorithm assessed the likelihood of a beta-lactam allergy and provided recommendations for either standard PAP or the use of an alternative agent. Adherence to the algorithm's recommendations and the incidence of allergic reactions following PAP were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2020 and October 2022, 983 surgical patients reported beta-lactam allergies. Of these, 322 patients (33%) either did not receive anesthesia or did not require PAP. Among the remaining 661 patients, the algorithm recommended standard prophylaxis for 420 (64%). Of these, 262 patients received BLA, resulting in 2 allergic reactions (0.8%; negative predictive value: 99.2%), while 158 received alternative antibiotics contrary to the recommendation, leading to 3 allergic reactions (1.9%). For the 241 patients (36%) in whom the algorithm indicated a high probability of beta-lactam allergy, 197 (82%) received alternative antibiotics with 4 allergic reactions (2%). Forty-four patients (18%) received BLA contrary to the algorithm's recommendation, with no allergic reactions observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The digital five-step algorithm was a simple and effective tool during preoperative assessment, enabling safe administration of standard PAP in 64% of surgical patients with reported beta-lactam allergies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数自我报告的β -内酰胺类抗生素(BLA)过敏是不准确的。本研究评估了一种数字工具,该工具旨在重新评估β -内酰胺过敏,并允许使用标准的围手术期抗生素预防(PAP),而无需事先进行过敏测试。方法:在这项回顾性、观察性单中心队列研究中,对报告β -内酰胺过敏的手术患者进行术前麻醉评估,采用数字五步问卷。该算法评估了β -内酰胺过敏的可能性,并提供了标准PAP或使用替代药物的建议。对算法建议的依从性和PAP后过敏反应的发生率进行分析。结果:在2020年9月至2022年10月期间,983例手术患者报告了β -内酰胺过敏。其中,322名患者(33%)没有接受麻醉或不需要PAP。在剩下的661例患者中,算法推荐420例(64%)采用标准预防。其中,262例患者使用BLA,导致2例过敏反应(0.8%,阴性预测值:99.2%),158例患者使用与推荐相反的替代抗生素,导致3例过敏反应(1.9%)。在算法显示β -内酰胺过敏高概率的241例患者(36%)中,197例(82%)接受了4次过敏反应(2%)的替代抗生素治疗。44名患者(18%)接受了与算法建议相反的BLA,未观察到过敏反应。结论:数字五步算法在术前评估中是一种简单有效的工具,使64%报告β -内酰胺过敏的手术患者能够安全地给予标准PAP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital five-step questionnaire to enhance standard perioperative prophylaxis in surgical patients with reported allergy to beta-lactam-antibiotics.

Background: Most self-reported beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) allergies are inaccurate. This study evaluated a digital tool designed to reassess beta-lactam allergies and enable the use of standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) without the need for prior allergy testing.

Methods: In this retrospective, observational single-center cohort study, a digital five-step questionnaire was utilized during preoperative anesthesia evaluations for surgical patients reporting beta-lactam allergies. The algorithm assessed the likelihood of a beta-lactam allergy and provided recommendations for either standard PAP or the use of an alternative agent. Adherence to the algorithm's recommendations and the incidence of allergic reactions following PAP were analyzed.

Results: Between September 2020 and October 2022, 983 surgical patients reported beta-lactam allergies. Of these, 322 patients (33%) either did not receive anesthesia or did not require PAP. Among the remaining 661 patients, the algorithm recommended standard prophylaxis for 420 (64%). Of these, 262 patients received BLA, resulting in 2 allergic reactions (0.8%; negative predictive value: 99.2%), while 158 received alternative antibiotics contrary to the recommendation, leading to 3 allergic reactions (1.9%). For the 241 patients (36%) in whom the algorithm indicated a high probability of beta-lactam allergy, 197 (82%) received alternative antibiotics with 4 allergic reactions (2%). Forty-four patients (18%) received BLA contrary to the algorithm's recommendation, with no allergic reactions observed.

Conclusions: The digital five-step algorithm was a simple and effective tool during preoperative assessment, enabling safe administration of standard PAP in 64% of surgical patients with reported beta-lactam allergies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信