Zoi Papalamprakopoulou, Tin H. Dang, Christopher J. Gonzalez, Colin J. Tedesco, Paul F. Updike, Christina Corl, Arpan Dharia, Noelia Hernandez, Martin F. Shapiro, Elaine Wethington, Andrew H. Talal
{"title":"通过便利的远程医疗治疗丙型肝炎的长期效益阿片类药物使用障碍患者在获得持续病毒学应答后5年的经历","authors":"Zoi Papalamprakopoulou, Tin H. Dang, Christopher J. Gonzalez, Colin J. Tedesco, Paul F. Updike, Christina Corl, Arpan Dharia, Noelia Hernandez, Martin F. Shapiro, Elaine Wethington, Andrew H. Talal","doi":"10.1111/hex.70404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Facilitated telemedicine is highly effective for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the long-term impact of sustained virological response (SVR) through this model of treatment remains unexplored. We examined how people with OUD perceive SVR achieved through facilitated telemedicine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted two focus group discussions (FGDs) with nine participants at least 5 years post-SVR through a randomised controlled trial of facilitated telemedicine in opioid treatment programmes (OTPs) (New York State, 2018–2020). Eligibility required active OTP enrolment at the time of FGDs. We used a semi-structured interview guide and performed thematic analysis of FGD transcripts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants had a mean age of 52.6 years (SD = 13.7), 66.6% were male, and 88.8% identified as White. We identified three FGD themes, each corresponding to pre-, during and post-intervention phases (see Figure 1): (1) Attitudes towards HCV and barriers to treatment among people with OUD, (2) Embracing facilitated telemedicine for HCV care integrated into OTPs, and (3) Experiencing long-term benefits from facilitated telemedicine across all aspects of HCV care and overall well-being. Barriers included competing priorities, perceiving HCV treatment as a low priority, and insurance restrictions (Theme 1). Participants valued facilitated telemedicine for its convenience, empathetic clinicians, and one-stop shop approach (Theme 2). At least 5 years post-SVR, participants reported benefits in HCV knowledge, improved OUD recovery, and improvement in whole health (Theme 3).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>At least 5 years post-SVR, people with OUD reported improvements in OUD recovery, overall well-being and sustained satisfaction with telemedicine-based HCV care. These findings highlight the lasting impact of both an SVR and care delivery through facilitated telemedicine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>In this study of patient involvement, we conducted focus groups with patient-participants to examine the long-term impact of receiving HCV care through facilitated telemedicine integrated into OTPs. Participants had previously taken part in a randomised controlled trial of facilitated telemedicine (New York State, 2018–2020). At least 5 years after achieving an SVR, we sought participant feedback to evaluate the long-term impact and sustainability of facilitated telemedicine as an approach to achieve an HCV cure with the objective of informing future policy development. Participants had also contributed critical input at various stages of the original study's design and implementation. During the pilot phase, participants advocated for facilitated telemedicine in a testimonial video. Participants provided feedback on design and implementation by participating in planning and site initiation meetings. A Patient Advisory Committee ensured participant voices were integrated into the research process by representing their feedback on study conduct. Additionally, a Sustainability Committee supported public involvement by promoting educational opportunities, providing input on implementation, and addressing long-term sustainability considerations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70404","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Benefits Following Hepatitis C Cure Through Facilitated Telemedicine; Experiences of People With Opioid use Disorder Five Years After Achieving a Sustained Virological Response\",\"authors\":\"Zoi Papalamprakopoulou, Tin H. Dang, Christopher J. Gonzalez, Colin J. Tedesco, Paul F. Updike, Christina Corl, Arpan Dharia, Noelia Hernandez, Martin F. Shapiro, Elaine Wethington, Andrew H. Talal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hex.70404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Facilitated telemedicine is highly effective for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the long-term impact of sustained virological response (SVR) through this model of treatment remains unexplored. We examined how people with OUD perceive SVR achieved through facilitated telemedicine.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted two focus group discussions (FGDs) with nine participants at least 5 years post-SVR through a randomised controlled trial of facilitated telemedicine in opioid treatment programmes (OTPs) (New York State, 2018–2020). Eligibility required active OTP enrolment at the time of FGDs. We used a semi-structured interview guide and performed thematic analysis of FGD transcripts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants had a mean age of 52.6 years (SD = 13.7), 66.6% were male, and 88.8% identified as White. We identified three FGD themes, each corresponding to pre-, during and post-intervention phases (see Figure 1): (1) Attitudes towards HCV and barriers to treatment among people with OUD, (2) Embracing facilitated telemedicine for HCV care integrated into OTPs, and (3) Experiencing long-term benefits from facilitated telemedicine across all aspects of HCV care and overall well-being. Barriers included competing priorities, perceiving HCV treatment as a low priority, and insurance restrictions (Theme 1). Participants valued facilitated telemedicine for its convenience, empathetic clinicians, and one-stop shop approach (Theme 2). At least 5 years post-SVR, participants reported benefits in HCV knowledge, improved OUD recovery, and improvement in whole health (Theme 3).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>At least 5 years post-SVR, people with OUD reported improvements in OUD recovery, overall well-being and sustained satisfaction with telemedicine-based HCV care. These findings highlight the lasting impact of both an SVR and care delivery through facilitated telemedicine.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient and Public Contribution</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study of patient involvement, we conducted focus groups with patient-participants to examine the long-term impact of receiving HCV care through facilitated telemedicine integrated into OTPs. Participants had previously taken part in a randomised controlled trial of facilitated telemedicine (New York State, 2018–2020). At least 5 years after achieving an SVR, we sought participant feedback to evaluate the long-term impact and sustainability of facilitated telemedicine as an approach to achieve an HCV cure with the objective of informing future policy development. Participants had also contributed critical input at various stages of the original study's design and implementation. During the pilot phase, participants advocated for facilitated telemedicine in a testimonial video. Participants provided feedback on design and implementation by participating in planning and site initiation meetings. A Patient Advisory Committee ensured participant voices were integrated into the research process by representing their feedback on study conduct. Additionally, a Sustainability Committee supported public involvement by promoting educational opportunities, providing input on implementation, and addressing long-term sustainability considerations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Expectations\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70404\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Expectations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70404\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Benefits Following Hepatitis C Cure Through Facilitated Telemedicine; Experiences of People With Opioid use Disorder Five Years After Achieving a Sustained Virological Response
Background
Facilitated telemedicine is highly effective for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among people with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the long-term impact of sustained virological response (SVR) through this model of treatment remains unexplored. We examined how people with OUD perceive SVR achieved through facilitated telemedicine.
Methods
We conducted two focus group discussions (FGDs) with nine participants at least 5 years post-SVR through a randomised controlled trial of facilitated telemedicine in opioid treatment programmes (OTPs) (New York State, 2018–2020). Eligibility required active OTP enrolment at the time of FGDs. We used a semi-structured interview guide and performed thematic analysis of FGD transcripts.
Results
Participants had a mean age of 52.6 years (SD = 13.7), 66.6% were male, and 88.8% identified as White. We identified three FGD themes, each corresponding to pre-, during and post-intervention phases (see Figure 1): (1) Attitudes towards HCV and barriers to treatment among people with OUD, (2) Embracing facilitated telemedicine for HCV care integrated into OTPs, and (3) Experiencing long-term benefits from facilitated telemedicine across all aspects of HCV care and overall well-being. Barriers included competing priorities, perceiving HCV treatment as a low priority, and insurance restrictions (Theme 1). Participants valued facilitated telemedicine for its convenience, empathetic clinicians, and one-stop shop approach (Theme 2). At least 5 years post-SVR, participants reported benefits in HCV knowledge, improved OUD recovery, and improvement in whole health (Theme 3).
Conclusion
At least 5 years post-SVR, people with OUD reported improvements in OUD recovery, overall well-being and sustained satisfaction with telemedicine-based HCV care. These findings highlight the lasting impact of both an SVR and care delivery through facilitated telemedicine.
Patient and Public Contribution
In this study of patient involvement, we conducted focus groups with patient-participants to examine the long-term impact of receiving HCV care through facilitated telemedicine integrated into OTPs. Participants had previously taken part in a randomised controlled trial of facilitated telemedicine (New York State, 2018–2020). At least 5 years after achieving an SVR, we sought participant feedback to evaluate the long-term impact and sustainability of facilitated telemedicine as an approach to achieve an HCV cure with the objective of informing future policy development. Participants had also contributed critical input at various stages of the original study's design and implementation. During the pilot phase, participants advocated for facilitated telemedicine in a testimonial video. Participants provided feedback on design and implementation by participating in planning and site initiation meetings. A Patient Advisory Committee ensured participant voices were integrated into the research process by representing their feedback on study conduct. Additionally, a Sustainability Committee supported public involvement by promoting educational opportunities, providing input on implementation, and addressing long-term sustainability considerations.
期刊介绍:
Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including:
• Person-centred care and quality improvement
• Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management
• Public perceptions of health services
• Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting
• Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation
• Empowerment and consumerism
• Patients'' role in safety and quality
• Patient and public role in health services research
• Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy
Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.