基于计算分析的捷克语语义语言流畅性评价。

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jiri Pesek, Hana Horakova, Martin Vyhnalek, Adéla Fendrych Mazancova, Kateřina Veverová, Hana Georgi, Veronika Matuskova, Tomas Nikolai
{"title":"基于计算分析的捷克语语义语言流畅性评价。","authors":"Jiri Pesek, Hana Horakova, Martin Vyhnalek, Adéla Fendrych Mazancova, Kateřina Veverová, Hana Georgi, Veronika Matuskova, Tomas Nikolai","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2550533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The semantic verbal fluency (SVF) task is a key method in neuropsychological assessment. A decline in SVF performance is common in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). While total word count is most often assessed, qualitative analysis can provide additional insights. However, traditional qualitative methods yield mixed results and have limitations. This study aims to assess the diagnostic potential of the computational method in the Czech context for patients with MCI and compare the novel approach with the traditional qualitative analysis. We analyzed the number of switches (NOS) and mean cluster size (MCS) in the vegetable and animal categories. In the animal category, the traditional and computational approaches showed poor diagnostic value for MCS. For NOS, the traditional approach was poor, while the computational approach showed fair diagnostic value. In the vegetable category, MCS had poor diagnostic value in both methods. For NOS, both the traditional (AUC = 0.761) and computational (AUC = 0.708) approaches showed fair diagnostic value. No significant differences were observed between the computational and traditional approaches across the measured indexes. Despite limitations such as group imbalances and difficulties handling multi-word phrases, computational analysis appears to be a promising tool for MCI assessment in Czech.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semantic verbal fluency assessment using computational analysis in the Czech language.\",\"authors\":\"Jiri Pesek, Hana Horakova, Martin Vyhnalek, Adéla Fendrych Mazancova, Kateřina Veverová, Hana Georgi, Veronika Matuskova, Tomas Nikolai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2025.2550533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The semantic verbal fluency (SVF) task is a key method in neuropsychological assessment. A decline in SVF performance is common in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). While total word count is most often assessed, qualitative analysis can provide additional insights. However, traditional qualitative methods yield mixed results and have limitations. This study aims to assess the diagnostic potential of the computational method in the Czech context for patients with MCI and compare the novel approach with the traditional qualitative analysis. We analyzed the number of switches (NOS) and mean cluster size (MCS) in the vegetable and animal categories. In the animal category, the traditional and computational approaches showed poor diagnostic value for MCS. For NOS, the traditional approach was poor, while the computational approach showed fair diagnostic value. In the vegetable category, MCS had poor diagnostic value in both methods. For NOS, both the traditional (AUC = 0.761) and computational (AUC = 0.708) approaches showed fair diagnostic value. No significant differences were observed between the computational and traditional approaches across the measured indexes. Despite limitations such as group imbalances and difficulties handling multi-word phrases, computational analysis appears to be a promising tool for MCI assessment in Czech.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2550533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2550533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语义言语流畅性(SVF)任务是神经心理学评估的一项重要方法。SVF功能下降在轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)中很常见。虽然总字数是最常评估的,但定性分析可以提供额外的见解。然而,传统的定性方法产生的结果好坏参半,并且存在局限性。本研究旨在评估捷克背景下计算方法对轻度认知障碍患者的诊断潜力,并将新方法与传统的定性分析方法进行比较。我们分析了植物类和动物类的开关数量(NOS)和平均簇大小(MCS)。在动物类别中,传统方法和计算方法对MCS的诊断价值较差。对于NOS,传统方法的诊断效果较差,而计算方法具有较好的诊断价值。在蔬菜类中,两种方法的MCS诊断价值均较差。对于NOS,传统方法(AUC = 0.761)和计算方法(AUC = 0.708)均具有良好的诊断价值。在测量的指标中,计算方法和传统方法之间没有显著差异。尽管存在群体失衡和处理多词短语的困难等限制,计算分析似乎是捷克语MCI评估的一个有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Semantic verbal fluency assessment using computational analysis in the Czech language.

The semantic verbal fluency (SVF) task is a key method in neuropsychological assessment. A decline in SVF performance is common in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). While total word count is most often assessed, qualitative analysis can provide additional insights. However, traditional qualitative methods yield mixed results and have limitations. This study aims to assess the diagnostic potential of the computational method in the Czech context for patients with MCI and compare the novel approach with the traditional qualitative analysis. We analyzed the number of switches (NOS) and mean cluster size (MCS) in the vegetable and animal categories. In the animal category, the traditional and computational approaches showed poor diagnostic value for MCS. For NOS, the traditional approach was poor, while the computational approach showed fair diagnostic value. In the vegetable category, MCS had poor diagnostic value in both methods. For NOS, both the traditional (AUC = 0.761) and computational (AUC = 0.708) approaches showed fair diagnostic value. No significant differences were observed between the computational and traditional approaches across the measured indexes. Despite limitations such as group imbalances and difficulties handling multi-word phrases, computational analysis appears to be a promising tool for MCI assessment in Czech.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信