{"title":"临床医生在观看透视吞咽研究时应该看哪里?一项实验性的眼球追踪研究。","authors":"Busra Ensar, Jeff Searl","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-25-00092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) visually assess videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) as reflected in eye-tracking data and to discuss challenges and barriers when using eye-tracking methodology to better understand VFSS review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirteen SLPs reviewed two swallows of a 5-ml thin liquid swallow while their eye movements were recorded. Fixation counts were analyzed across anatomically relevant areas of interest (AOIs). Data were analyzed descriptively, and statistical comparisons were made between the two swallows using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings included an overall decline in fixation count rate in the second swallow, significant variability in eye-gaze behavior across participants, and AOI-specific changes. The bolus received the highest fixation count rate in both swallows, and visual attention shifted from anterior-superior structures in the first swallow to more posterior-inferior structures in the second swallow. Methodological challenges included but were not limited to drawing the constantly changing AOI boundary and the lack of guidelines for missing gaze data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eye tracking offers exploratory insights into SLPs' visual attention during VFSS review, revealing variable gaze patterns and methodological challenges. Future research should further explore the link between gaze behavior and VFSS interpretation, possibly revealing patterns that may influence clinical decision making about a patient's swallowing physiology and shape clinical training accordingly.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30104632.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Do Clinicians Look When Viewing Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies? A Pilot Eye-Tracking Study.\",\"authors\":\"Busra Ensar, Jeff Searl\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-25-00092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) visually assess videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) as reflected in eye-tracking data and to discuss challenges and barriers when using eye-tracking methodology to better understand VFSS review.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirteen SLPs reviewed two swallows of a 5-ml thin liquid swallow while their eye movements were recorded. Fixation counts were analyzed across anatomically relevant areas of interest (AOIs). Data were analyzed descriptively, and statistical comparisons were made between the two swallows using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key findings included an overall decline in fixation count rate in the second swallow, significant variability in eye-gaze behavior across participants, and AOI-specific changes. The bolus received the highest fixation count rate in both swallows, and visual attention shifted from anterior-superior structures in the first swallow to more posterior-inferior structures in the second swallow. Methodological challenges included but were not limited to drawing the constantly changing AOI boundary and the lack of guidelines for missing gaze data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eye tracking offers exploratory insights into SLPs' visual attention during VFSS review, revealing variable gaze patterns and methodological challenges. Future research should further explore the link between gaze behavior and VFSS interpretation, possibly revealing patterns that may influence clinical decision making about a patient's swallowing physiology and shape clinical training accordingly.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.30104632.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-25-00092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-25-00092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Where Do Clinicians Look When Viewing Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies? A Pilot Eye-Tracking Study.
Purpose: This study aimed to explore how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) visually assess videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) as reflected in eye-tracking data and to discuss challenges and barriers when using eye-tracking methodology to better understand VFSS review.
Method: Thirteen SLPs reviewed two swallows of a 5-ml thin liquid swallow while their eye movements were recorded. Fixation counts were analyzed across anatomically relevant areas of interest (AOIs). Data were analyzed descriptively, and statistical comparisons were made between the two swallows using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.
Results: Key findings included an overall decline in fixation count rate in the second swallow, significant variability in eye-gaze behavior across participants, and AOI-specific changes. The bolus received the highest fixation count rate in both swallows, and visual attention shifted from anterior-superior structures in the first swallow to more posterior-inferior structures in the second swallow. Methodological challenges included but were not limited to drawing the constantly changing AOI boundary and the lack of guidelines for missing gaze data.
Conclusions: Eye tracking offers exploratory insights into SLPs' visual attention during VFSS review, revealing variable gaze patterns and methodological challenges. Future research should further explore the link between gaze behavior and VFSS interpretation, possibly revealing patterns that may influence clinical decision making about a patient's swallowing physiology and shape clinical training accordingly.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.