手术室中外科麻醉师关系的系统回顾。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Iris Wang, Yao Zhang, Yuan Yuan Yao, Bin Zheng
{"title":"手术室中外科麻醉师关系的系统回顾。","authors":"Iris Wang, Yao Zhang, Yuan Yuan Yao, Bin Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists is critical to managing intraoperative challenges and ensuring patient safety. Despite its importance, the specific dynamics of this relationship remain underexplored, with few studies providing quantitative assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on studies that examined the surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship and its impact on surgical outcomes. Data were extracted on measurement methodologies, relationship indicators, reported outcome effects, identified barriers, and proposed interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven papers met inclusion criteria, all employing surveys or field observations to evaluate communication frequency, content, and patterns. Methods were similar to general team collaboration assessments, lacking multidimensional measures. Potential complementary metrics include collaborative behaviors such as anticipatory movements and eye-tracking to assess shared visual attention. Evidence linking relationship quality to patient outcomes was limited and inconsistent. Reported barriers included operating room culture, negative perceptions, and communication gaps. Suggested interventions included pre-surgical briefings, debriefings, and enhanced visualization of patient and surgical information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Current evidence on the surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship is sparse and methodologically limited. Future research should incorporate advanced behavioral and technological metrics to enable robust quantification, inform targeted interventions, and strengthen interprofessional collaboration to improve patient safety and surgical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship in the operating room.\",\"authors\":\"Iris Wang, Yao Zhang, Yuan Yuan Yao, Bin Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2025.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists is critical to managing intraoperative challenges and ensuring patient safety. Despite its importance, the specific dynamics of this relationship remain underexplored, with few studies providing quantitative assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on studies that examined the surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship and its impact on surgical outcomes. Data were extracted on measurement methodologies, relationship indicators, reported outcome effects, identified barriers, and proposed interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven papers met inclusion criteria, all employing surveys or field observations to evaluate communication frequency, content, and patterns. Methods were similar to general team collaboration assessments, lacking multidimensional measures. Potential complementary metrics include collaborative behaviors such as anticipatory movements and eye-tracking to assess shared visual attention. Evidence linking relationship quality to patient outcomes was limited and inconsistent. Reported barriers included operating room culture, negative perceptions, and communication gaps. Suggested interventions included pre-surgical briefings, debriefings, and enhanced visualization of patient and surgical information.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Current evidence on the surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship is sparse and methodologically limited. Future research should incorporate advanced behavioral and technological metrics to enable robust quantification, inform targeted interventions, and strengthen interprofessional collaboration to improve patient safety and surgical performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.09.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:外科医生和麻醉师之间的有效合作对于处理术中挑战和确保患者安全至关重要。尽管它很重要,但这种关系的具体动态仍未得到充分探索,很少有研究提供定量评估。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行结构化文献综述,重点研究外科麻醉师关系及其对手术结果的影响。提取了测量方法、关系指标、报告的结果效应、确定的障碍和建议的干预措施方面的数据。结果:11篇论文符合纳入标准,均采用问卷调查或实地观察来评估交流频率、内容和模式。方法类似于一般的团队协作评估,缺乏多维度量。潜在的补充指标包括协作行为,如预期运动和眼球追踪,以评估共同的视觉注意力。将关系质量与患者预后联系起来的证据有限且不一致。报告的障碍包括手术室文化、负面看法和沟通差距。建议的干预措施包括术前简报、情况汇报和增强患者和手术信息的可视化。讨论:目前关于外科麻醉师关系的证据很少,方法上也有限。未来的研究应纳入先进的行为和技术指标,以实现稳健的量化,为有针对性的干预提供信息,并加强专业间的合作,以提高患者的安全性和手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship in the operating room.

Introduction: Effective collaboration between surgeons and anesthesiologists is critical to managing intraoperative challenges and ensuring patient safety. Despite its importance, the specific dynamics of this relationship remain underexplored, with few studies providing quantitative assessments.

Methods: A structured literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, focusing on studies that examined the surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship and its impact on surgical outcomes. Data were extracted on measurement methodologies, relationship indicators, reported outcome effects, identified barriers, and proposed interventions.

Results: Eleven papers met inclusion criteria, all employing surveys or field observations to evaluate communication frequency, content, and patterns. Methods were similar to general team collaboration assessments, lacking multidimensional measures. Potential complementary metrics include collaborative behaviors such as anticipatory movements and eye-tracking to assess shared visual attention. Evidence linking relationship quality to patient outcomes was limited and inconsistent. Reported barriers included operating room culture, negative perceptions, and communication gaps. Suggested interventions included pre-surgical briefings, debriefings, and enhanced visualization of patient and surgical information.

Discussion: Current evidence on the surgeon-anesthesiologist relationship is sparse and methodologically limited. Future research should incorporate advanced behavioral and technological metrics to enable robust quantification, inform targeted interventions, and strengthen interprofessional collaboration to improve patient safety and surgical performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信