体现的智慧:对功能性躯体症状的可接受和有益的解释。

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chloe Saunders, Heidi Frølund Pedersen, Charlotte Ulrikka Rask, Monica Greco, Lisbeth Frostholm
{"title":"体现的智慧:对功能性躯体症状的可接受和有益的解释。","authors":"Chloe Saunders, Heidi Frølund Pedersen, Charlotte Ulrikka Rask, Monica Greco, Lisbeth Frostholm","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2025-013380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many people with persistent symptoms navigate illness without an adequate explanatory framework. The systematic disadvantages that arise from the lack of a collectively shared explanation can be considered a form of epistemic injustice, namely hermeneutic injustice. In response to this problem, we explored whether therapeutically relevant and broadly acceptable explanations for symptoms could be developed through iterative stages of dialogue between knowledge partners with lived experience of multisystem functional somatic symptoms (FSS), healthcare professionals across disciplines, symptom researchers, translators and designers. This participatory design project, positioned within a contested area of healthcare, aimed to bridge the gap between patients' and healthcare professionals' epistemic worlds by offering a symptom explanation framework that can reflect complex causality and multiple perspectives. Key conceptual considerations encountered during the process included: the importance of coherence across ontological, scientific and clinical levels of explanation; the need for a therapeutic model of agency that empowers without assigning blame; the integration of temporal dimensions into explanation; the use of metaphor and personal narrative; the role of the internet in shaping illness identity; and the challenge of personalisation of explanations intended for the public domain. The resulting framework is available open-access at www.bodysymptoms.org and presents 28 broadly relevant, acceptable and usable explanations for FSS, drawn from current perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals and researchers across Europe, alongside actionable health advice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embodied wisdom: towards acceptable and helpful explanations for functional somatic symptoms.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Saunders, Heidi Frølund Pedersen, Charlotte Ulrikka Rask, Monica Greco, Lisbeth Frostholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/medhum-2025-013380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many people with persistent symptoms navigate illness without an adequate explanatory framework. The systematic disadvantages that arise from the lack of a collectively shared explanation can be considered a form of epistemic injustice, namely hermeneutic injustice. In response to this problem, we explored whether therapeutically relevant and broadly acceptable explanations for symptoms could be developed through iterative stages of dialogue between knowledge partners with lived experience of multisystem functional somatic symptoms (FSS), healthcare professionals across disciplines, symptom researchers, translators and designers. This participatory design project, positioned within a contested area of healthcare, aimed to bridge the gap between patients' and healthcare professionals' epistemic worlds by offering a symptom explanation framework that can reflect complex causality and multiple perspectives. Key conceptual considerations encountered during the process included: the importance of coherence across ontological, scientific and clinical levels of explanation; the need for a therapeutic model of agency that empowers without assigning blame; the integration of temporal dimensions into explanation; the use of metaphor and personal narrative; the role of the internet in shaping illness identity; and the challenge of personalisation of explanations intended for the public domain. The resulting framework is available open-access at www.bodysymptoms.org and presents 28 broadly relevant, acceptable and usable explanations for FSS, drawn from current perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals and researchers across Europe, alongside actionable health advice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多有持续症状的人在没有适当的解释框架的情况下应对疾病。由于缺乏集体共享的解释而产生的系统缺点可以被认为是一种认识论上的不公正,即解释学上的不公正。针对这一问题,我们探讨了是否可以通过具有多系统功能性躯体症状(FSS)生活经验的知识伙伴、跨学科的医疗保健专业人员、症状研究人员、翻译人员和设计人员之间的反复对话,开发出与治疗相关且被广泛接受的症状解释。这个参与式设计项目位于一个有争议的医疗保健领域,旨在通过提供一个可以反映复杂因果关系和多种观点的症状解释框架,弥合患者和医疗保健专业人员认知世界之间的差距。在此过程中遇到的关键概念考虑包括:在本体论、科学和临床层面解释的一致性的重要性;需要一种治疗模式的代理,赋予权力而不指责;将时间维度纳入解释;隐喻和个人叙事的运用;网络在疾病认同形成中的作用以及为公共领域提供个性化解释的挑战。由此产生的框架可在www.bodysymptoms.org上开放获取,并为FSS提供了28个广泛相关、可接受和可用的解释,这些解释来自欧洲各地患者、医疗保健专业人员和研究人员的当前观点,以及可操作的健康建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Embodied wisdom: towards acceptable and helpful explanations for functional somatic symptoms.

Many people with persistent symptoms navigate illness without an adequate explanatory framework. The systematic disadvantages that arise from the lack of a collectively shared explanation can be considered a form of epistemic injustice, namely hermeneutic injustice. In response to this problem, we explored whether therapeutically relevant and broadly acceptable explanations for symptoms could be developed through iterative stages of dialogue between knowledge partners with lived experience of multisystem functional somatic symptoms (FSS), healthcare professionals across disciplines, symptom researchers, translators and designers. This participatory design project, positioned within a contested area of healthcare, aimed to bridge the gap between patients' and healthcare professionals' epistemic worlds by offering a symptom explanation framework that can reflect complex causality and multiple perspectives. Key conceptual considerations encountered during the process included: the importance of coherence across ontological, scientific and clinical levels of explanation; the need for a therapeutic model of agency that empowers without assigning blame; the integration of temporal dimensions into explanation; the use of metaphor and personal narrative; the role of the internet in shaping illness identity; and the challenge of personalisation of explanations intended for the public domain. The resulting framework is available open-access at www.bodysymptoms.org and presents 28 broadly relevant, acceptable and usable explanations for FSS, drawn from current perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals and researchers across Europe, alongside actionable health advice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信