项目评估的外部有效性与可泛化性:拥抱复杂性。

IF 3.7 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Anne Revillard
{"title":"项目评估的外部有效性与可泛化性:拥抱复杂性。","authors":"Anne Revillard","doi":"10.1177/0193841X251380908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This introduction to the second special issue of <i>Evaluation review</i> on external validity and generalizability opens a dialogue between different ways to think about generalizability in program evaluation. It argues that generalizability in impact evaluation fundamentally is about inferring some form of <i>causality</i> at a level broader than the specific circumstances of the initial study or studies from which these inferences are drawn. The question, then, is about how one apprehends causality: in other words, <i>what</i> is being generalized and <i>how</i>? The first special issue mainly relied on a <i>counterfactual</i> conception of causality, embodied by experimental and quasi-experimental methods, that aimed at impact <i>measurement</i>. The articles in this volume, drawing on mixed methods, also mobilize <i>generative</i> and <i>configurational</i> causal inferences to provide further levers of generalizability, focusing on <i>how</i> the impact is produced. The introduction insists on the specific input of qualitative methods in this respect, as theorized by grounded theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":47533,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Review","volume":" ","pages":"193841X251380908"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validity and Generalizability in Program Evaluation: Embracing Complexity.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Revillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0193841X251380908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This introduction to the second special issue of <i>Evaluation review</i> on external validity and generalizability opens a dialogue between different ways to think about generalizability in program evaluation. It argues that generalizability in impact evaluation fundamentally is about inferring some form of <i>causality</i> at a level broader than the specific circumstances of the initial study or studies from which these inferences are drawn. The question, then, is about how one apprehends causality: in other words, <i>what</i> is being generalized and <i>how</i>? The first special issue mainly relied on a <i>counterfactual</i> conception of causality, embodied by experimental and quasi-experimental methods, that aimed at impact <i>measurement</i>. The articles in this volume, drawing on mixed methods, also mobilize <i>generative</i> and <i>configurational</i> causal inferences to provide further levers of generalizability, focusing on <i>how</i> the impact is produced. The introduction insists on the specific input of qualitative methods in this respect, as theorized by grounded theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"193841X251380908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X251380908\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X251380908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对《评价评论》第二期特刊《外部效度与概括性》的介绍,开启了对项目评价中概括性的不同思考方式之间的对话。它认为,影响评估的概括性基本上是在比最初研究或从中得出这些推论的研究的具体情况更广泛的层面上推断某种形式的因果关系。那么,问题就在于一个人如何理解因果关系:换句话说,什么被一般化了,怎样一般化了?第一期特刊主要依靠反事实的因果关系概念,以实验和准实验方法为体现,旨在衡量影响。本卷中的文章采用混合方法,还调动了生成性和配置性因果推论,以提供进一步的概括性杠杆,重点关注影响是如何产生的。引言部分坚持定性方法在这方面的具体投入,以扎根理论为依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External Validity and Generalizability in Program Evaluation: Embracing Complexity.

This introduction to the second special issue of Evaluation review on external validity and generalizability opens a dialogue between different ways to think about generalizability in program evaluation. It argues that generalizability in impact evaluation fundamentally is about inferring some form of causality at a level broader than the specific circumstances of the initial study or studies from which these inferences are drawn. The question, then, is about how one apprehends causality: in other words, what is being generalized and how? The first special issue mainly relied on a counterfactual conception of causality, embodied by experimental and quasi-experimental methods, that aimed at impact measurement. The articles in this volume, drawing on mixed methods, also mobilize generative and configurational causal inferences to provide further levers of generalizability, focusing on how the impact is produced. The introduction insists on the specific input of qualitative methods in this respect, as theorized by grounded theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Review
Evaluation Review SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Evaluation Review is the forum for researchers, planners, and policy makers engaged in the development, implementation, and utilization of studies aimed at the betterment of the human condition. The Editors invite submission of papers reporting the findings of evaluation studies in such fields as child development, health, education, income security, manpower, mental health, criminal justice, and the physical and social environments. In addition, Evaluation Review will contain articles on methodological developments, discussions of the state of the art, and commentaries on issues related to the application of research results. Special features will include periodic review essays, "research briefs", and "craft reports".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信