Kedo-S旋转锉与Kedo-SH手动锉在拔牙过程中的效率和封闭质量结果。

Q3 Dentistry
Bharati Dewangan, Ankita Ukey, Pratik Surana, Balasubramanyam Vasant, Kanika Singh Dhull, Brahmananda Dutta
{"title":"Kedo-S旋转锉与Kedo-SH手动锉在拔牙过程中的效率和封闭质量结果。","authors":"Bharati Dewangan, Ankita Ukey, Pratik Surana, Balasubramanyam Vasant, Kanika Singh Dhull, Brahmananda Dutta","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enduring research in pediatric endodontics has resulted in the development of many file systems with increased efficacy and advantages. The rotary system was created to improve treatment quality and reduce manual dexterity, resulting in a better treatment protocol.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the research involves the evaluation and comparison of efficiency as well as subsequent obturation quality of the Kedo-S and Kedo-SH files during pulp canal therapy in deciduous molars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Children of 4-8 years requiring pulpectomy in forty deciduous lower molars were randomly divided into two different groups: Kedo-SH file (Group I) and Kedo-S file (Group II). A stopwatch was utilized for documentation of instrumentation time, and Coll and Sadrian criteria were utilized for observation of obturation quality. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was analyzed using the independent <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean instrumentation time in group I was 207.2 seconds, which was far more than group II (150.8 seconds), with <i>p</i>-value < 0.0001. No statistically significant variance was observed in obturation quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kedo-S group resulted in less instrumentation time when compared to Kedo-SH with better obturation quality.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Dewangan B, Ukey A, Surana P, <i>et al</i>. Efficiency and Obturation Quality Outcomes between Kedo-S Rotary Files and Kedo-SH Manual Files Instrumentation during Pulpectomy in Primary Molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):982-985.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 8","pages":"982-985"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency and Obturation Quality Outcomes between Kedo-S Rotary Files and Kedo-SH Manual Files Instrumentation during Pulpectomy in Primary Molars.\",\"authors\":\"Bharati Dewangan, Ankita Ukey, Pratik Surana, Balasubramanyam Vasant, Kanika Singh Dhull, Brahmananda Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enduring research in pediatric endodontics has resulted in the development of many file systems with increased efficacy and advantages. The rotary system was created to improve treatment quality and reduce manual dexterity, resulting in a better treatment protocol.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of the research involves the evaluation and comparison of efficiency as well as subsequent obturation quality of the Kedo-S and Kedo-SH files during pulp canal therapy in deciduous molars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Children of 4-8 years requiring pulpectomy in forty deciduous lower molars were randomly divided into two different groups: Kedo-SH file (Group I) and Kedo-S file (Group II). A stopwatch was utilized for documentation of instrumentation time, and Coll and Sadrian criteria were utilized for observation of obturation quality. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was analyzed using the independent <i>t</i>-test and Chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean instrumentation time in group I was 207.2 seconds, which was far more than group II (150.8 seconds), with <i>p</i>-value < 0.0001. No statistically significant variance was observed in obturation quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kedo-S group resulted in less instrumentation time when compared to Kedo-SH with better obturation quality.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Dewangan B, Ukey A, Surana P, <i>et al</i>. Efficiency and Obturation Quality Outcomes between Kedo-S Rotary Files and Kedo-SH Manual Files Instrumentation during Pulpectomy in Primary Molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):982-985.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"982-985\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童牙髓学的长期研究已经导致了许多文件系统的发展,提高了疗效和优势。旋转系统的创建是为了提高治疗质量和减少手工灵巧性,从而产生更好的治疗方案。目的:评价和比较Kedo-S锉和Kedo-SH锉在乳磨牙髓管治疗中的效果和后续的封堵质量。材料与方法:选取4 ~ 8岁需要取牙的40颗乳牙患儿,随机分为Kedo-SH锉组(I组)和Kedo-S锉组(II组)。使用秒表记录仪器时间,使用Coll和Sadrian标准观察闭孔质量。所得资料的统计分析采用独立t检验和卡方检验。结果:I组平均仪器时间为207.2秒,远高于II组(150.8秒),p值< 0.0001。闭孔质量无统计学差异。结论:与Kedo-SH组相比,Kedo-S组内固定时间短,闭孔质量好。本文引用方式:Dewangan B, Ukey A, Surana P等。Kedo-S旋转锉与Kedo-SH手动锉在拔牙过程中的效率和封闭质量结果。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(8):982-985。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency and Obturation Quality Outcomes between Kedo-S Rotary Files and Kedo-SH Manual Files Instrumentation during Pulpectomy in Primary Molars.

Background: Enduring research in pediatric endodontics has resulted in the development of many file systems with increased efficacy and advantages. The rotary system was created to improve treatment quality and reduce manual dexterity, resulting in a better treatment protocol.

Aim: The purpose of the research involves the evaluation and comparison of efficiency as well as subsequent obturation quality of the Kedo-S and Kedo-SH files during pulp canal therapy in deciduous molars.

Materials and methods: Children of 4-8 years requiring pulpectomy in forty deciduous lower molars were randomly divided into two different groups: Kedo-SH file (Group I) and Kedo-S file (Group II). A stopwatch was utilized for documentation of instrumentation time, and Coll and Sadrian criteria were utilized for observation of obturation quality. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was analyzed using the independent t-test and Chi-square test.

Results: Mean instrumentation time in group I was 207.2 seconds, which was far more than group II (150.8 seconds), with p-value < 0.0001. No statistically significant variance was observed in obturation quality.

Conclusion: Kedo-S group resulted in less instrumentation time when compared to Kedo-SH with better obturation quality.

How to cite this article: Dewangan B, Ukey A, Surana P, et al. Efficiency and Obturation Quality Outcomes between Kedo-S Rotary Files and Kedo-SH Manual Files Instrumentation during Pulpectomy in Primary Molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):982-985.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信