{"title":"复合树脂与玻璃复合修复体带状冠修复儿童早期龋齿的临床效果评价:双盲平行组随机对照试验","authors":"Nidhi Malik, Rashmi Nayak, Shashidhar Acharya","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Composite resin strip crowns (CRSC) are a popular choice for the restoration of primary incisors affected by early childhood caries (ECC). The inherent disadvantage of composite resins necessitates a search for more biological materials to be used for restorations in this high-caries-risk scenario.</p><p><strong>Aims and objective: </strong>This <i>in vivo</i> study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and parental satisfaction with strip crown restorations placed using a glass hybrid restorative system (GC Equia Forte HT) and CRSC (GC G-aenial anterior composite) in primary maxillary incisors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 32 teeth from 16 children aged 3-6 years with ECC requiring multisurface restorations in their primary maxillary incisors were included and randomly assigned to the test group (GC Equia Forte) or the control group (GC G-aenial composite resin). Clinical assessment was done using Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria, and parental satisfaction was evaluated using a five-point Likert scale over 3 months. The Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test were used for inferential and intergroup analysis, respectively, and intragroup analysis was done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GC Equia Forte outperformed GC G-aenial composite resin in terms of esthetic parameters, that is, color match and translucency (<i>p</i> < 0.005). In terms of functional and biological aspects, the performance of both restorations was comparable. Parental satisfaction did not differ between the study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that GC Equia Forte HT is a suitable and viable alternative to composite resin for strip crown restorations in pediatric patients with ECC.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>GC Equia Forte HT proves to be esthetically superior and functionally and biologically comparable to composite resin for strip crown restoration of carious primary incisors in precooperative-aged children with ECC.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Malik N, Nayak R, Acharya S. Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Strip Crown Restorations with Composite Resin vs Glass Hybrid Restorative System for Primary Anterior Teeth of Children with Early Childhood Caries: A Double-blind Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):922-929.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 8","pages":"922-929"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Strip Crown Restorations with Composite Resin vs Glass Hybrid Restorative System for Primary Anterior Teeth of Children with Early Childhood Caries: A Double-blind Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nidhi Malik, Rashmi Nayak, Shashidhar Acharya\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Composite resin strip crowns (CRSC) are a popular choice for the restoration of primary incisors affected by early childhood caries (ECC). The inherent disadvantage of composite resins necessitates a search for more biological materials to be used for restorations in this high-caries-risk scenario.</p><p><strong>Aims and objective: </strong>This <i>in vivo</i> study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and parental satisfaction with strip crown restorations placed using a glass hybrid restorative system (GC Equia Forte HT) and CRSC (GC G-aenial anterior composite) in primary maxillary incisors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 32 teeth from 16 children aged 3-6 years with ECC requiring multisurface restorations in their primary maxillary incisors were included and randomly assigned to the test group (GC Equia Forte) or the control group (GC G-aenial composite resin). Clinical assessment was done using Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria, and parental satisfaction was evaluated using a five-point Likert scale over 3 months. The Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test were used for inferential and intergroup analysis, respectively, and intragroup analysis was done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GC Equia Forte outperformed GC G-aenial composite resin in terms of esthetic parameters, that is, color match and translucency (<i>p</i> < 0.005). In terms of functional and biological aspects, the performance of both restorations was comparable. Parental satisfaction did not differ between the study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that GC Equia Forte HT is a suitable and viable alternative to composite resin for strip crown restorations in pediatric patients with ECC.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>GC Equia Forte HT proves to be esthetically superior and functionally and biologically comparable to composite resin for strip crown restoration of carious primary incisors in precooperative-aged children with ECC.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Malik N, Nayak R, Acharya S. Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Strip Crown Restorations with Composite Resin vs Glass Hybrid Restorative System for Primary Anterior Teeth of Children with Early Childhood Caries: A Double-blind Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):922-929.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"922-929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:复合树脂条冠(CRSC)是早期儿童龋病(ECC)影响的初级门牙修复的常用选择。复合树脂固有的缺点需要寻找更多的生物材料来用于这种高龋病风险的修复。目的和目的:本体内研究旨在比较在上颌切牙中使用玻璃混合修复系统(GC Equia Forte HT)和CRSC (GC g - enial anterior composite)放置条冠修复体的临床效果和父母满意度。材料与方法:选取16例3 ~ 6岁患ECC需要多面修复的儿童32颗牙,随机分为试验组(GC Equia Forte)和对照组(GC G-aenial复合树脂)。临床评估采用国际牙科医生协会(FDI)标准进行,父母满意度采用李克特5分量表在3个月内进行评估。组间分析采用χ 2检验,组间分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验,组内分析采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。结果:GC - Equia Forte在颜色匹配度和透光性方面优于GC - g - enial复合树脂(p < 0.005)。在功能和生物学方面,两种修复体的性能是可比的。父母满意度在研究小组之间没有差异。结论:GC - Equia Forte HT是一种可行的替代复合树脂用于儿童ECC患者带状冠修复的材料。临床意义:GC Equia Forte HT在美学上优于复合树脂,在功能和生物学上可与复合树脂媲美,用于学龄前ECC儿童龋牙的条带冠修复。杨建军,杨建军,李建军,等。复合树脂复合冠修复体与玻璃复合冠修复体修复儿童早期龋齿的临床效果评价:双盲平行组随机对照试验。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(8):922-929。
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Strip Crown Restorations with Composite Resin vs Glass Hybrid Restorative System for Primary Anterior Teeth of Children with Early Childhood Caries: A Double-blind Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Composite resin strip crowns (CRSC) are a popular choice for the restoration of primary incisors affected by early childhood caries (ECC). The inherent disadvantage of composite resins necessitates a search for more biological materials to be used for restorations in this high-caries-risk scenario.
Aims and objective: This in vivo study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and parental satisfaction with strip crown restorations placed using a glass hybrid restorative system (GC Equia Forte HT) and CRSC (GC G-aenial anterior composite) in primary maxillary incisors.
Materials and methods: A total of 32 teeth from 16 children aged 3-6 years with ECC requiring multisurface restorations in their primary maxillary incisors were included and randomly assigned to the test group (GC Equia Forte) or the control group (GC G-aenial composite resin). Clinical assessment was done using Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria, and parental satisfaction was evaluated using a five-point Likert scale over 3 months. The Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for inferential and intergroup analysis, respectively, and intragroup analysis was done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: GC Equia Forte outperformed GC G-aenial composite resin in terms of esthetic parameters, that is, color match and translucency (p < 0.005). In terms of functional and biological aspects, the performance of both restorations was comparable. Parental satisfaction did not differ between the study groups.
Conclusion: The results suggest that GC Equia Forte HT is a suitable and viable alternative to composite resin for strip crown restorations in pediatric patients with ECC.
Clinical significance: GC Equia Forte HT proves to be esthetically superior and functionally and biologically comparable to composite resin for strip crown restoration of carious primary incisors in precooperative-aged children with ECC.
How to cite this article: Malik N, Nayak R, Acharya S. Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Strip Crown Restorations with Composite Resin vs Glass Hybrid Restorative System for Primary Anterior Teeth of Children with Early Childhood Caries: A Double-blind Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(8):922-929.