Tamar P Feldman, Mackenzie Brandon-Coatham, Jayme Kurach, Carly Olafson, Jason Acker, Michael Wellington, Bethany L Brown
{"title":"用2,3- dpg、ATP和p50检测评估红细胞产品质量:一项BEST合作研究。","authors":"Tamar P Feldman, Mackenzie Brandon-Coatham, Jayme Kurach, Carly Olafson, Jason Acker, Michael Wellington, Bethany L Brown","doi":"10.1111/vox.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To comply with regulatory guidelines, blood products undergo laboratory testing to assess red blood cell (RBC) quality during manufacturing, storage and delivery. Measurements of metabolites such as 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) have been relied upon as proxies for in vivo function, although their predictive value for clinical efficacy is not well substantiated. Following the discontinuation of the only validated commercial assay for 2,3-DPG, we reviewed existing literature and performed a retrospective analysis of datasets from two blood centres in North America to evaluate adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) and p50 as alternatives. The literature did not provide sufficient evidence to support adopting p50 in place of 2,3-DPG. Although the assays are complementary, we found several exceptions in which biological and technical factors reduced the strength of correlation between 2,3-DPG and p50. ATP, another marker of RBC quality, was not well correlated either with 2,3-DPG or p50 in quality monitoring datasets or with in vivo circulation kinetics in healthy adults. Our assessment underscores the need for a replacement assay for 2,3-DPG for comprehensive characterization of novel red cell products and storage conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing red blood cell product quality with 2,3-DPG, ATP and p50 assays: A BEST Collaborative study.\",\"authors\":\"Tamar P Feldman, Mackenzie Brandon-Coatham, Jayme Kurach, Carly Olafson, Jason Acker, Michael Wellington, Bethany L Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vox.70117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To comply with regulatory guidelines, blood products undergo laboratory testing to assess red blood cell (RBC) quality during manufacturing, storage and delivery. Measurements of metabolites such as 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) have been relied upon as proxies for in vivo function, although their predictive value for clinical efficacy is not well substantiated. Following the discontinuation of the only validated commercial assay for 2,3-DPG, we reviewed existing literature and performed a retrospective analysis of datasets from two blood centres in North America to evaluate adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) and p50 as alternatives. The literature did not provide sufficient evidence to support adopting p50 in place of 2,3-DPG. Although the assays are complementary, we found several exceptions in which biological and technical factors reduced the strength of correlation between 2,3-DPG and p50. ATP, another marker of RBC quality, was not well correlated either with 2,3-DPG or p50 in quality monitoring datasets or with in vivo circulation kinetics in healthy adults. Our assessment underscores the need for a replacement assay for 2,3-DPG for comprehensive characterization of novel red cell products and storage conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing red blood cell product quality with 2,3-DPG, ATP and p50 assays: A BEST Collaborative study.
To comply with regulatory guidelines, blood products undergo laboratory testing to assess red blood cell (RBC) quality during manufacturing, storage and delivery. Measurements of metabolites such as 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) have been relied upon as proxies for in vivo function, although their predictive value for clinical efficacy is not well substantiated. Following the discontinuation of the only validated commercial assay for 2,3-DPG, we reviewed existing literature and performed a retrospective analysis of datasets from two blood centres in North America to evaluate adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) and p50 as alternatives. The literature did not provide sufficient evidence to support adopting p50 in place of 2,3-DPG. Although the assays are complementary, we found several exceptions in which biological and technical factors reduced the strength of correlation between 2,3-DPG and p50. ATP, another marker of RBC quality, was not well correlated either with 2,3-DPG or p50 in quality monitoring datasets or with in vivo circulation kinetics in healthy adults. Our assessment underscores the need for a replacement assay for 2,3-DPG for comprehensive characterization of novel red cell products and storage conditions.
期刊介绍:
Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections:
1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention:
Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood;
Bacterial contamination of blood components;
Donor recruitment and selection methods;
Pathogen inactivation.
2) Blood Component Collection and Production:
Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis);
Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives;
Preparation of labile blood components;
Inventory management;
Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage;
Collection and storage of tissues;
Quality management and good manufacturing practice;
Automation and information technology.
3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies:
Transfusion thresholds and audits;
Haemovigilance;
Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy;
Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion;
Therapeutic apheresis;
Support of transplant patients;
Gene therapy and immunotherapy.
4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics:
Autoimmunity in haematology;
Alloimmunity of blood;
Pre-transfusion testing;
Immunodiagnostics;
Immunobiology;
Complement in immunohaematology;
Blood typing reagents;
Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function;
Genetic markers and disease;
Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology.
5) Cellular Therapy:
Cell-based therapies;
Stem cell sources;
Stem cell processing and storage;
Stem cell products;
Stem cell plasticity;
Regenerative medicine with cells;
Cellular immunotherapy;
Molecular therapy;
Gene therapy.