Sebastiano Mercadante, Yasmine Grassi, Claudio Adile, Giorgio Sapienza, Alessio Lo Cascio, Alesssandra Casuccio
{"title":"位于综合癌症中心的急性姑息治疗单位的临床和出院结果。","authors":"Sebastiano Mercadante, Yasmine Grassi, Claudio Adile, Giorgio Sapienza, Alessio Lo Cascio, Alesssandra Casuccio","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09938-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was, other than assessing clinical outcomes after a comprehensive palliative care treatment in APCU, to report the activity and functioning of APCU in influencing subsequent care trajectory and settings of patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A consecutive sample of patients with cancer who were admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU) was prospectively assessed. All patients underwent comprehensive palliative care treatment. At admission (T0), patients' demographics, reasons for admission, referral, and recent anticancer treatments were recorded, along with whether they were on/off treatment or uncertain. Subsequent referrals to next care settings and the pathway of oncologic treatment were reconsidered. Symptom intensity was measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-hundred and twenty patients were surveyed. Clinical deterioration was the most frequent indication for APCU admission. Most admissions were planned (60.8%). At discharge, a significant decrease in the number of \"on therapy\" patients was reported, and concomitantly, the number of \"off-therapy\" patients increased (p < 0.0005) in comparison with data recorded at admission. A significant number of patients was assigned to a palliative care setting, including home palliative care or hospice at the time of discharge (p < 0.0005). All ESAS items that significantly improved during admission were significant. Being \"off therapy\" was independently associated with a lower Karnofsky (p = 0.002), higher global ESAS at discharge (p = 0.032), and discharge to a palliative setting (hospice or home palliative care) (p < 0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from the present study has shown that APCU results in a crossroad for patients with advanced cancer, allowing selection for transition of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 10","pages":"876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and discharge outcomes in an acute palliative care unit located in a comprehensive cancer center.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastiano Mercadante, Yasmine Grassi, Claudio Adile, Giorgio Sapienza, Alessio Lo Cascio, Alesssandra Casuccio\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09938-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was, other than assessing clinical outcomes after a comprehensive palliative care treatment in APCU, to report the activity and functioning of APCU in influencing subsequent care trajectory and settings of patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A consecutive sample of patients with cancer who were admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU) was prospectively assessed. All patients underwent comprehensive palliative care treatment. At admission (T0), patients' demographics, reasons for admission, referral, and recent anticancer treatments were recorded, along with whether they were on/off treatment or uncertain. Subsequent referrals to next care settings and the pathway of oncologic treatment were reconsidered. Symptom intensity was measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-hundred and twenty patients were surveyed. Clinical deterioration was the most frequent indication for APCU admission. Most admissions were planned (60.8%). At discharge, a significant decrease in the number of \\\"on therapy\\\" patients was reported, and concomitantly, the number of \\\"off-therapy\\\" patients increased (p < 0.0005) in comparison with data recorded at admission. A significant number of patients was assigned to a palliative care setting, including home palliative care or hospice at the time of discharge (p < 0.0005). All ESAS items that significantly improved during admission were significant. Being \\\"off therapy\\\" was independently associated with a lower Karnofsky (p = 0.002), higher global ESAS at discharge (p = 0.032), and discharge to a palliative setting (hospice or home palliative care) (p < 0.0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data from the present study has shown that APCU results in a crossroad for patients with advanced cancer, allowing selection for transition of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 10\",\"pages\":\"876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09938-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09938-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical and discharge outcomes in an acute palliative care unit located in a comprehensive cancer center.
Purpose: The aim of this study was, other than assessing clinical outcomes after a comprehensive palliative care treatment in APCU, to report the activity and functioning of APCU in influencing subsequent care trajectory and settings of patients with advanced cancer.
Patients and methods: A consecutive sample of patients with cancer who were admitted to an acute palliative care unit (APCU) was prospectively assessed. All patients underwent comprehensive palliative care treatment. At admission (T0), patients' demographics, reasons for admission, referral, and recent anticancer treatments were recorded, along with whether they were on/off treatment or uncertain. Subsequent referrals to next care settings and the pathway of oncologic treatment were reconsidered. Symptom intensity was measured by Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS).
Results: Five-hundred and twenty patients were surveyed. Clinical deterioration was the most frequent indication for APCU admission. Most admissions were planned (60.8%). At discharge, a significant decrease in the number of "on therapy" patients was reported, and concomitantly, the number of "off-therapy" patients increased (p < 0.0005) in comparison with data recorded at admission. A significant number of patients was assigned to a palliative care setting, including home palliative care or hospice at the time of discharge (p < 0.0005). All ESAS items that significantly improved during admission were significant. Being "off therapy" was independently associated with a lower Karnofsky (p = 0.002), higher global ESAS at discharge (p = 0.032), and discharge to a palliative setting (hospice or home palliative care) (p < 0.0005).
Conclusion: Data from the present study has shown that APCU results in a crossroad for patients with advanced cancer, allowing selection for transition of care.
期刊介绍:
Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease.
Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.