巴基斯坦腭瘘困难指数(PPFDI):开发和初步验证一个新的评分指标的手术复杂性和转诊指导。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Muhammad Daiem, Ghulam Q Fayyaz, Muhammad Sohail, Farrukh A Khalid, Muhammad M Bashir, Marvee Turk, Samra Bokhari, Muhammad A Mustehsan, Marshall G Miles, Peter J Taub, Phuong Nguyen, Jesse Taylor, Corstiaan Breugem
{"title":"巴基斯坦腭瘘困难指数(PPFDI):开发和初步验证一个新的评分指标的手术复杂性和转诊指导。","authors":"Muhammad Daiem, Ghulam Q Fayyaz, Muhammad Sohail, Farrukh A Khalid, Muhammad M Bashir, Marvee Turk, Samra Bokhari, Muhammad A Mustehsan, Marshall G Miles, Peter J Taub, Phuong Nguyen, Jesse Taylor, Corstiaan Breugem","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Daiem, Ghulam Q Fayyaz, Muhammad Sohail, Farrukh A Khalid, Muhammad M Bashir, Marvee Turk, Samra Bokhari, Muhammad A Mustehsan, Marshall G Miles, Peter J Taub, Phuong Nguyen, Jesse Taylor, Corstiaan Breugem\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腭瘘仍然是腭裂修复后最常见的并发症,最近的研究报告发病率从2%到35%不等。现有的分类系统对手术复杂性或转诊途径的指导有限。本研究开发并验证了巴基斯坦腭瘘困难指数(PPFDI),这是一种新的评分系统,旨在根据6个方面量化瘘的复杂性:位置、大小、形态、瘘数量、复发史和腭咽功能。根据复杂性和外科医生的经验,提出了一个三层框架来指导转诊。每个领域以3分的顺序评分,总分范围为6到18分。通过30名唇腭裂专家参与的改进德尔菲法建立内容效度和面部效度,6个领域均达到≥70%的一致性。评估者间信度采用标准化、匿名的临床病例档案(n=30),由4名资深唇裂外科医生独立评分。PPFDI表现出较强的评级间信度(ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95),特定领域的ICC范围为0.78至0.92。PPFDI平均评分为11.1 (SD=2.9),其中43.3%的病例属于高复杂性(评分≥12)。ppfdi知情的转诊级别与临床医生确定的转诊需求之间的一致性为91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81),表明非常一致。PPFDI提供了一种可靠且有临床意义的方法来分层腭瘘复杂性,并可能在资源匮乏和资源匮乏的环境中支持更结构化的决策。通过多中心研究和与手术结果的相关性,进一步验证其更广泛的临床适用性是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance.

Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信