Muhammad Daiem, Ghulam Q Fayyaz, Muhammad Sohail, Farrukh A Khalid, Muhammad M Bashir, Marvee Turk, Samra Bokhari, Muhammad A Mustehsan, Marshall G Miles, Peter J Taub, Phuong Nguyen, Jesse Taylor, Corstiaan Breugem
{"title":"巴基斯坦腭瘘困难指数(PPFDI):开发和初步验证一个新的评分指标的手术复杂性和转诊指导。","authors":"Muhammad Daiem, Ghulam Q Fayyaz, Muhammad Sohail, Farrukh A Khalid, Muhammad M Bashir, Marvee Turk, Samra Bokhari, Muhammad A Mustehsan, Marshall G Miles, Peter J Taub, Phuong Nguyen, Jesse Taylor, Corstiaan Breugem","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Daiem, Ghulam Q Fayyaz, Muhammad Sohail, Farrukh A Khalid, Muhammad M Bashir, Marvee Turk, Samra Bokhari, Muhammad A Mustehsan, Marshall G Miles, Peter J Taub, Phuong Nguyen, Jesse Taylor, Corstiaan Breugem\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI): Development and Initial Validation of a Novel Scoring Index for Surgical Complexity and Referral Guidance.
Palatal fistulae remain the most common complication following cleft palate repair, with recent studies reporting incidence rates ranging from 2% to 35%. Existing classification systems offer limited guidance on surgical complexity or referral pathways. This study developed and validated the Pakistan Palatal Fistula Difficulty Index (PPFDI), a novel scoring system designed to quantify fistula complexity based on 6 domains: location, size, configuration, number of fistulae, recurrence history, and velopharyngeal function. A 3-tiered framework was proposed to guide referral based on complexity level and surgeon experience. Each domain was scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, yielding a total score range of 6 to 18. Content and face validity were established through a modified Delphi process involving 30 expert cleft surgeons, with all 6 domains achieving ≥70% agreement. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using standardized, anonymized clinical case files (n=30) independently scored by 4 senior cleft surgeons. The PPFDI demonstrated strong inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.87-0.95), with domain-specific ICCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.92. The mean PPFDI score was 11.1 (SD=2.9), with 43.3% of cases classified as high complexity (score ≥12). Agreement between PPFDI-informed referral tier and clinician-determined referral need was 91.7% (Cohen kappa=0.81), indicating excellent alignment. The PPFDI offers a reliable and clinically meaningful method to stratify palatal fistula complexity and may support more structured decision-making in both low-resource and high-resource settings. Further validation through multicenter studies and correlation with surgical outcomes is warranted to confirm its broader clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.