经导管关闭动脉导管未闭与手术结扎对极早产儿神经发育的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
D C Kaluarachchi, V Y Chock, B T Do, M A Rysavy, M N Sankar, M M Laughon, C H Backes, T T Colaizy, E F Bell, P J McNamara, S R Hintz, G Natarajan
{"title":"经导管关闭动脉导管未闭与手术结扎对极早产儿神经发育的影响。","authors":"D C Kaluarachchi, V Y Chock, B T Do, M A Rysavy, M N Sankar, M M Laughon, C H Backes, T T Colaizy, E F Bell, P J McNamara, S R Hintz, G Natarajan","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02417-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of data on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants who undergo transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (TCPC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) or death at 2 years among preterm infants treated with TCPC compared to surgical ligation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of infants born at <27 weeks' gestation at NICHD NRN sites. Comparisons were made between infants who underwent TCPC and PDA ligation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TCPC and surgical ligation were performed on 99 and 279 infants, respectively. Death or severe NDI occurred in 49% of infants with TCPC and 40% with surgical ligation. There was no difference in odds of death or severe NDI between the two groups [aOR 1.12 95% CI: 0.55-2.26)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCPC had similar odds of death or severe NDI compared to surgical ligation. These findings need to be evaluated in large prospective studies as the management practice around the TCPC evolves.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: Generic Database: NCT00063063.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants undergoing trans-catheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus compared to surgical ligation.\",\"authors\":\"D C Kaluarachchi, V Y Chock, B T Do, M A Rysavy, M N Sankar, M M Laughon, C H Backes, T T Colaizy, E F Bell, P J McNamara, S R Hintz, G Natarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41372-025-02417-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of data on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants who undergo transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (TCPC).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) or death at 2 years among preterm infants treated with TCPC compared to surgical ligation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of infants born at <27 weeks' gestation at NICHD NRN sites. Comparisons were made between infants who underwent TCPC and PDA ligation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TCPC and surgical ligation were performed on 99 and 279 infants, respectively. Death or severe NDI occurred in 49% of infants with TCPC and 40% with surgical ligation. There was no difference in odds of death or severe NDI between the two groups [aOR 1.12 95% CI: 0.55-2.26)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TCPC had similar odds of death or severe NDI compared to surgical ligation. These findings need to be evaluated in large prospective studies as the management practice around the TCPC evolves.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: Generic Database: NCT00063063.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02417-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02417-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于经导管动脉导管未闭(PDA)闭合(TCPC)的早产儿神经发育结局的数据缺乏。目的:与手术结扎相比,评估TCPC治疗早产儿2岁时神经发育障碍(NDI)或死亡。结果:分别对99例和279例患儿行TCPC和结扎手术。49%的TCPC婴儿死亡或严重NDI, 40%的TCPC婴儿手术结扎。两组患者死亡或严重NDI的几率无差异[aOR 1.12 95% CI: 0.55-2.26)]。结论:与手术结扎相比,TCPC的死亡或严重NDI的几率相似。随着围绕TCPC的管理实践的发展,这些发现需要在大型前瞻性研究中进行评估。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID:通用数据库:NCT00063063。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants undergoing trans-catheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus compared to surgical ligation.

Background: There is a paucity of data on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants who undergo transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure (TCPC).

Objective: To evaluate neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) or death at 2 years among preterm infants treated with TCPC compared to surgical ligation.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of infants born at <27 weeks' gestation at NICHD NRN sites. Comparisons were made between infants who underwent TCPC and PDA ligation.

Results: TCPC and surgical ligation were performed on 99 and 279 infants, respectively. Death or severe NDI occurred in 49% of infants with TCPC and 40% with surgical ligation. There was no difference in odds of death or severe NDI between the two groups [aOR 1.12 95% CI: 0.55-2.26)].

Conclusion: TCPC had similar odds of death or severe NDI compared to surgical ligation. These findings need to be evaluated in large prospective studies as the management practice around the TCPC evolves.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: Generic Database: NCT00063063.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信