易于使用和易于解释的3D梯度回波t1加权MR采集序列的质量控制,以提高基于mri的海马体积测量的重测稳定性。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Ralph Buchert, Per Suppa, Babak A Ardekani, Fuensanta Bellvís Bataller, Pierrick Bourgeat, Pierrick Coupé, Robert Dahnke, Gabriel A Devenyi, Simon Fristed Eskildsen, Clara Fischer, Jose Vincente Manjón Herrera, Christian Ledig, Andreas Lemke, Bénédicte Maréchal, Roland Opfer, Diana M Sima, Lothar Spies, Aziz M Ulug, Hans-Jürgen Huppertz
{"title":"易于使用和易于解释的3D梯度回波t1加权MR采集序列的质量控制,以提高基于mri的海马体积测量的重测稳定性。","authors":"Ralph Buchert, Per Suppa, Babak A Ardekani, Fuensanta Bellvís Bataller, Pierrick Bourgeat, Pierrick Coupé, Robert Dahnke, Gabriel A Devenyi, Simon Fristed Eskildsen, Clara Fischer, Jose Vincente Manjón Herrera, Christian Ledig, Andreas Lemke, Bénédicte Maréchal, Roland Opfer, Diana M Sima, Lothar Spies, Aziz M Ulug, Hans-Jürgen Huppertz","doi":"10.1177/13872877251380301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMRI-based hippocampus volume (HV) is widely used as neurodegeneration marker in Alzheimer's disease.ObjectiveAn easy-to-use and easy-to-interpret method to categorize T1-weighted MR sequences with respect to test-retest stability of hippocampus volumetry based on general image quality metrics (IQM).MethodsThe study included 446 3D T1-weighted MRI scans of one healthy middle-aged man obtained during 32 months in 122 scanning sessions performed with 96 different scanners at 76 different sites. Each scanning session represented a different acquisition sequence of ≥2 back-to-back repeat scans (3.7 ± 0.7 on average). Unilateral HVs were determined with 18 different tools for automatic volumetry. An acquisition sequence was considered \"poor\" if the z-score of the within-session coefficient-of-variation of the HV estimates from the session, averaged across all volumetry tools and both hemispheres, exceeded one standard deviation. General IQM were computed for each scanning session using the freely available MRI Quality Control Tool. A classification-and-regression tree (CART) was trained to discriminate between good and poor acquisition sequences using the IQM as input.ResultsThe CART selected the left-right width of the acquisition field-of-view and the contrast-to-noise ratio as predictor variables. Overall accuracy of the CART was 79.5%. CART-based classification increased the ratio of good-to-poor acquisition sequences from 3.5 among all sequences to 7.4 among the sequences predicted to be good. This was at the expense of losing 15% of the good sequences.ConclusionsThe IQM-based decision tree model provides useful performance for the differentiation of T1-weighted sequences associated with good versus poor test-retest stability of hippocampus volumetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251380301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Easy-to-use and easy-to-interpret quality control of 3D gradient echo T1-weighted MR acquisition sequences for improved test-retest stability of MRI-based hippocampus volumetry.\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Buchert, Per Suppa, Babak A Ardekani, Fuensanta Bellvís Bataller, Pierrick Bourgeat, Pierrick Coupé, Robert Dahnke, Gabriel A Devenyi, Simon Fristed Eskildsen, Clara Fischer, Jose Vincente Manjón Herrera, Christian Ledig, Andreas Lemke, Bénédicte Maréchal, Roland Opfer, Diana M Sima, Lothar Spies, Aziz M Ulug, Hans-Jürgen Huppertz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251380301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundMRI-based hippocampus volume (HV) is widely used as neurodegeneration marker in Alzheimer's disease.ObjectiveAn easy-to-use and easy-to-interpret method to categorize T1-weighted MR sequences with respect to test-retest stability of hippocampus volumetry based on general image quality metrics (IQM).MethodsThe study included 446 3D T1-weighted MRI scans of one healthy middle-aged man obtained during 32 months in 122 scanning sessions performed with 96 different scanners at 76 different sites. Each scanning session represented a different acquisition sequence of ≥2 back-to-back repeat scans (3.7 ± 0.7 on average). Unilateral HVs were determined with 18 different tools for automatic volumetry. An acquisition sequence was considered \\\"poor\\\" if the z-score of the within-session coefficient-of-variation of the HV estimates from the session, averaged across all volumetry tools and both hemispheres, exceeded one standard deviation. General IQM were computed for each scanning session using the freely available MRI Quality Control Tool. A classification-and-regression tree (CART) was trained to discriminate between good and poor acquisition sequences using the IQM as input.ResultsThe CART selected the left-right width of the acquisition field-of-view and the contrast-to-noise ratio as predictor variables. Overall accuracy of the CART was 79.5%. CART-based classification increased the ratio of good-to-poor acquisition sequences from 3.5 among all sequences to 7.4 among the sequences predicted to be good. This was at the expense of losing 15% of the good sequences.ConclusionsThe IQM-based decision tree model provides useful performance for the differentiation of T1-weighted sequences associated with good versus poor test-retest stability of hippocampus volumetry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251380301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251380301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251380301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于mri的海马体积(HV)被广泛用作阿尔茨海默病的神经变性标志物。目的建立一种易于使用、易于解释的基于一般图像质量指标(IQM)的海马体积法重测稳定性的t1加权MR序列分类方法。方法研究纳入了一名健康中年男性的446次3D t1加权MRI扫描,扫描时间为32个月,在76个不同部位使用96台不同的扫描仪进行了122次扫描。每个扫描时段代表≥2个背对背重复扫描的不同获取序列(平均3.7±0.7)。采用18种不同的自动体积测定工具测定单侧HVs。如果采集序列中HV估计的会话内变异系数的z分数(所有体积测量工具和两个半球的平均值)超过一个标准差,则认为采集序列“差”。使用免费的MRI质量控制工具计算每次扫描的一般IQM。使用IQM作为输入,训练分类和回归树(CART)来区分好的和差的采集序列。结果CART选择采集视场的左右宽度和噪比作为预测变量。CART的总体准确率为79.5%。基于cart的分类提高了采集序列的好坏比率,从所有序列中的3.5增加到预测好的序列中的7.4。这是以失去15%的好序列为代价的。结论基于iqm的决策树模型能够有效区分海马体积法测重稳定性好坏的t1加权序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Easy-to-use and easy-to-interpret quality control of 3D gradient echo T1-weighted MR acquisition sequences for improved test-retest stability of MRI-based hippocampus volumetry.

BackgroundMRI-based hippocampus volume (HV) is widely used as neurodegeneration marker in Alzheimer's disease.ObjectiveAn easy-to-use and easy-to-interpret method to categorize T1-weighted MR sequences with respect to test-retest stability of hippocampus volumetry based on general image quality metrics (IQM).MethodsThe study included 446 3D T1-weighted MRI scans of one healthy middle-aged man obtained during 32 months in 122 scanning sessions performed with 96 different scanners at 76 different sites. Each scanning session represented a different acquisition sequence of ≥2 back-to-back repeat scans (3.7 ± 0.7 on average). Unilateral HVs were determined with 18 different tools for automatic volumetry. An acquisition sequence was considered "poor" if the z-score of the within-session coefficient-of-variation of the HV estimates from the session, averaged across all volumetry tools and both hemispheres, exceeded one standard deviation. General IQM were computed for each scanning session using the freely available MRI Quality Control Tool. A classification-and-regression tree (CART) was trained to discriminate between good and poor acquisition sequences using the IQM as input.ResultsThe CART selected the left-right width of the acquisition field-of-view and the contrast-to-noise ratio as predictor variables. Overall accuracy of the CART was 79.5%. CART-based classification increased the ratio of good-to-poor acquisition sequences from 3.5 among all sequences to 7.4 among the sequences predicted to be good. This was at the expense of losing 15% of the good sequences.ConclusionsThe IQM-based decision tree model provides useful performance for the differentiation of T1-weighted sequences associated with good versus poor test-retest stability of hippocampus volumetry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信