探索口服液中的“罂粟籽防御”:食用罂粟籽后阿片类药物的检测。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Lena Midtlyng, Gudrun Høiseth, Rafika Rahho, Cecilie Hasselø Thaulow
{"title":"探索口服液中的“罂粟籽防御”:食用罂粟籽后阿片类药物的检测。","authors":"Lena Midtlyng, Gudrun Høiseth, Rafika Rahho, Cecilie Hasselø Thaulow","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The \"poppy seed defense\" - a claim that a positive opioid test result is due to ingestion of poppy seeds-is occasionally encountered in forensic toxicology. The matter has been thoroughly investigated in urine but is less researched in oral fluid. We therefore aimed to perform an experimental study to explore whether consumption of commercially available poppy seeds would lead to detection of opioids in oral fluid. Additionally, we aimed to relate our findings to routine cases. Ten volunteers consumed either five crispbreads containing a small amount of poppy seeds, or 30 grams of raw poppy seeds with a low opioid content (3.0 mg/kg morphine and 0.9 mg/kg codeine). Oral fluid samples were collected 0.5 and 2 hours after consumption. Additionally, a urine sample was collected 2 hours after consumption. Following ingestion of raw seeds, morphine was detected (estimated neat oral fluid concentrations 1.4-5.6 ng/mL) in all oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption, and in one (2.4 ng/mL) of five oral fluid samples after 2 hours. Codeine was detected (0.8-1.1 ng/mL) in three of five oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption, but in none after 2 hours. Following ingestion of crispbreads, morphine or codeine were not detected in oral fluid, but opioids/-glucuronides were detected in three of five urine samples. When comparing our results with routine cases, we found that 14% of routine cases had morphine concentrations in oral fluid samples lower or similar to those seen after ingestion of raw seeds in our experimental study. In conclusion, we found that consumption of raw seeds led to detection of opioids in oral fluid, but the detection window appeared to be short. Comparison with routine cases indicated that the poppy seed defense may be a challenge when interpreting oral fluid results, particularly when low cut-off levels are applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the \\\"Poppy seed defense\\\" in oral fluid: Detection of opioids following poppy seed consumption.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Midtlyng, Gudrun Høiseth, Rafika Rahho, Cecilie Hasselø Thaulow\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkaf088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The \\\"poppy seed defense\\\" - a claim that a positive opioid test result is due to ingestion of poppy seeds-is occasionally encountered in forensic toxicology. The matter has been thoroughly investigated in urine but is less researched in oral fluid. We therefore aimed to perform an experimental study to explore whether consumption of commercially available poppy seeds would lead to detection of opioids in oral fluid. Additionally, we aimed to relate our findings to routine cases. Ten volunteers consumed either five crispbreads containing a small amount of poppy seeds, or 30 grams of raw poppy seeds with a low opioid content (3.0 mg/kg morphine and 0.9 mg/kg codeine). Oral fluid samples were collected 0.5 and 2 hours after consumption. Additionally, a urine sample was collected 2 hours after consumption. Following ingestion of raw seeds, morphine was detected (estimated neat oral fluid concentrations 1.4-5.6 ng/mL) in all oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption, and in one (2.4 ng/mL) of five oral fluid samples after 2 hours. Codeine was detected (0.8-1.1 ng/mL) in three of five oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption, but in none after 2 hours. Following ingestion of crispbreads, morphine or codeine were not detected in oral fluid, but opioids/-glucuronides were detected in three of five urine samples. When comparing our results with routine cases, we found that 14% of routine cases had morphine concentrations in oral fluid samples lower or similar to those seen after ingestion of raw seeds in our experimental study. In conclusion, we found that consumption of raw seeds led to detection of opioids in oral fluid, but the detection window appeared to be short. Comparison with routine cases indicated that the poppy seed defense may be a challenge when interpreting oral fluid results, particularly when low cut-off levels are applied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“罂粟种子辩护”——一种声称阿片类药物测试结果呈阳性是由于摄入罂粟种子的说法——在法医毒理学中偶尔会遇到。这一问题已在尿液中进行了彻底的研究,但在口服液中研究较少。因此,我们的目标是进行一项实验研究,以探索消费市售罂粟种子是否会导致在口服液中检测到阿片类药物。此外,我们的目的是将我们的发现与常规病例联系起来。10名志愿者要么吃5个含有少量罂粟籽的薯片,要么吃30克含低阿片类物质的生罂粟籽(吗啡3.0毫克/千克,可待因0.9毫克/千克)。服用后0.5小时和2小时分别采集口服液样本。此外,在食用后2小时采集尿液样本。在摄入生种子后,0.5小时后在所有口服液样本中检测到吗啡(估计纯口服液浓度为1.4-5.6 ng/mL), 2小时后在5个口服液样本中的一个(2.4 ng/mL)中检测到吗啡。5份口服液样品中有3份在服用后0.5小时检测到可待因(0.8-1.1 ng/mL),但在服用后2小时未检测到可待因。在摄入薯片后,在口服液中未检测到吗啡或可待因,但在5个尿样中的3个尿样中检测到阿片类药物/-葡萄糖醛酸盐。当将我们的结果与常规病例进行比较时,我们发现14%的常规病例的口服液样本中的吗啡浓度低于或类似于我们实验研究中摄入生种子后的浓度。综上所述,我们发现食用生种子导致了口服液中阿片类药物的检测,但检测窗口似乎很短。与常规病例的比较表明,在解释口服液结果时,特别是在应用低临界值时,罂粟籽防御可能是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the "Poppy seed defense" in oral fluid: Detection of opioids following poppy seed consumption.

The "poppy seed defense" - a claim that a positive opioid test result is due to ingestion of poppy seeds-is occasionally encountered in forensic toxicology. The matter has been thoroughly investigated in urine but is less researched in oral fluid. We therefore aimed to perform an experimental study to explore whether consumption of commercially available poppy seeds would lead to detection of opioids in oral fluid. Additionally, we aimed to relate our findings to routine cases. Ten volunteers consumed either five crispbreads containing a small amount of poppy seeds, or 30 grams of raw poppy seeds with a low opioid content (3.0 mg/kg morphine and 0.9 mg/kg codeine). Oral fluid samples were collected 0.5 and 2 hours after consumption. Additionally, a urine sample was collected 2 hours after consumption. Following ingestion of raw seeds, morphine was detected (estimated neat oral fluid concentrations 1.4-5.6 ng/mL) in all oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption, and in one (2.4 ng/mL) of five oral fluid samples after 2 hours. Codeine was detected (0.8-1.1 ng/mL) in three of five oral fluid samples 0.5 hours after consumption, but in none after 2 hours. Following ingestion of crispbreads, morphine or codeine were not detected in oral fluid, but opioids/-glucuronides were detected in three of five urine samples. When comparing our results with routine cases, we found that 14% of routine cases had morphine concentrations in oral fluid samples lower or similar to those seen after ingestion of raw seeds in our experimental study. In conclusion, we found that consumption of raw seeds led to detection of opioids in oral fluid, but the detection window appeared to be short. Comparison with routine cases indicated that the poppy seed defense may be a challenge when interpreting oral fluid results, particularly when low cut-off levels are applied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信