David Hui, Ishwaria M Subbiah, David Hong, Penny Stanton, Jennifer Ellefson, Monawar Hosain, Josue Becerra, Vera de la Cruz, Amy Ontai, Ali Haider, Ethan Huang, Sanjay Shete, Eduardo Bruera
{"title":"将远程监测纳入晚期癌症患者I期治疗的姑息治疗:一项随机临床试验","authors":"David Hui, Ishwaria M Subbiah, David Hong, Penny Stanton, Jennifer Ellefson, Monawar Hosain, Josue Becerra, Vera de la Cruz, Amy Ontai, Ali Haider, Ethan Huang, Sanjay Shete, Eduardo Bruera","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Outpatient specialist palliative care (SPC) referral improves patient outcomes; however, it is unclear whether additional remote monitoring (RM) would provide further benefit. This pilot, parallel-group, single-blind, randomized clinical trial examined the within-group effect of monthly SPC alone or with additional weekly RM on symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer undergoing phase I therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria included advanced solid tumor diagnosis and moderate-to-high symptom burden (ie, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS] score ≥4/10 for ≥1 symptom and Global Distress Score [GDS] ≥20/90) before starting phase I therapies. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either monthly outpatient SPC visits alone or with additional RM, consisting of weekly phone calls and concurrent electronic ESAS assessments between monthly SPC visits. The primary outcome was within-group change in symptom burden (ESAS-GDS) from baseline to 2 weeks; secondary outcomes included within-group change from baseline in ESAS-GDS and health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being [FACIT-Sp]) over 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 15, 2020, and December 21, 2022, 115 patients consented and 100 were randomly assigned (SPC + RM, n = 57; SPC, n = 43). The mean age (standard deviation) of analyzed patients was 56 (12) years, and 57 (64%) were female. At 2 weeks, SPC + RM had significant within-group improvement in ESAS-GDS (mean change, -5.0 [95% CI, -8.9 to -1.2]; <i>P</i> = .01) and FACIT-Sp (5.6 [95% CI, 1.2 to 10]; <i>P</i> = .01), but SPC alone did not (ESAS-GDS, -2.0 [95% CI, -5.8 to 1.8]; <i>P</i> = .29; FACIT-Sp, -1.1 [95% CI, -7.3 to 5.1]; <i>P</i> = .50). HRQOL improved significantly in SPC + RM compared with SPC at 12 weeks (14 [95% CI, 2.6 to 25]; <i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating RM into SPC may improve symptoms and HRQOL beyond SPC alone for patients with moderate-to-high symptom burden. Our findings are considered preliminary and larger confirmatory trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500442"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of Remote Monitoring Into Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer Undergoing Phase I Therapies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"David Hui, Ishwaria M Subbiah, David Hong, Penny Stanton, Jennifer Ellefson, Monawar Hosain, Josue Becerra, Vera de la Cruz, Amy Ontai, Ali Haider, Ethan Huang, Sanjay Shete, Eduardo Bruera\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP-25-00442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Outpatient specialist palliative care (SPC) referral improves patient outcomes; however, it is unclear whether additional remote monitoring (RM) would provide further benefit. This pilot, parallel-group, single-blind, randomized clinical trial examined the within-group effect of monthly SPC alone or with additional weekly RM on symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer undergoing phase I therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria included advanced solid tumor diagnosis and moderate-to-high symptom burden (ie, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS] score ≥4/10 for ≥1 symptom and Global Distress Score [GDS] ≥20/90) before starting phase I therapies. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either monthly outpatient SPC visits alone or with additional RM, consisting of weekly phone calls and concurrent electronic ESAS assessments between monthly SPC visits. The primary outcome was within-group change in symptom burden (ESAS-GDS) from baseline to 2 weeks; secondary outcomes included within-group change from baseline in ESAS-GDS and health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being [FACIT-Sp]) over 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 15, 2020, and December 21, 2022, 115 patients consented and 100 were randomly assigned (SPC + RM, n = 57; SPC, n = 43). The mean age (standard deviation) of analyzed patients was 56 (12) years, and 57 (64%) were female. At 2 weeks, SPC + RM had significant within-group improvement in ESAS-GDS (mean change, -5.0 [95% CI, -8.9 to -1.2]; <i>P</i> = .01) and FACIT-Sp (5.6 [95% CI, 1.2 to 10]; <i>P</i> = .01), but SPC alone did not (ESAS-GDS, -2.0 [95% CI, -5.8 to 1.8]; <i>P</i> = .29; FACIT-Sp, -1.1 [95% CI, -7.3 to 5.1]; <i>P</i> = .50). HRQOL improved significantly in SPC + RM compared with SPC at 12 weeks (14 [95% CI, 2.6 to 25]; <i>P</i> = .02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating RM into SPC may improve symptoms and HRQOL beyond SPC alone for patients with moderate-to-high symptom burden. Our findings are considered preliminary and larger confirmatory trials are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"OP2500442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00442\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integration of Remote Monitoring Into Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer Undergoing Phase I Therapies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Purpose: Outpatient specialist palliative care (SPC) referral improves patient outcomes; however, it is unclear whether additional remote monitoring (RM) would provide further benefit. This pilot, parallel-group, single-blind, randomized clinical trial examined the within-group effect of monthly SPC alone or with additional weekly RM on symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer undergoing phase I therapies.
Methods: Eligibility criteria included advanced solid tumor diagnosis and moderate-to-high symptom burden (ie, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS] score ≥4/10 for ≥1 symptom and Global Distress Score [GDS] ≥20/90) before starting phase I therapies. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either monthly outpatient SPC visits alone or with additional RM, consisting of weekly phone calls and concurrent electronic ESAS assessments between monthly SPC visits. The primary outcome was within-group change in symptom burden (ESAS-GDS) from baseline to 2 weeks; secondary outcomes included within-group change from baseline in ESAS-GDS and health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being [FACIT-Sp]) over 12 weeks.
Results: Between December 15, 2020, and December 21, 2022, 115 patients consented and 100 were randomly assigned (SPC + RM, n = 57; SPC, n = 43). The mean age (standard deviation) of analyzed patients was 56 (12) years, and 57 (64%) were female. At 2 weeks, SPC + RM had significant within-group improvement in ESAS-GDS (mean change, -5.0 [95% CI, -8.9 to -1.2]; P = .01) and FACIT-Sp (5.6 [95% CI, 1.2 to 10]; P = .01), but SPC alone did not (ESAS-GDS, -2.0 [95% CI, -5.8 to 1.8]; P = .29; FACIT-Sp, -1.1 [95% CI, -7.3 to 5.1]; P = .50). HRQOL improved significantly in SPC + RM compared with SPC at 12 weeks (14 [95% CI, 2.6 to 25]; P = .02).
Conclusion: Incorporating RM into SPC may improve symptoms and HRQOL beyond SPC alone for patients with moderate-to-high symptom burden. Our findings are considered preliminary and larger confirmatory trials are needed.