生物膜形成的评价,粘接强度和清洁方案的有效性对含粘合剂的丙烯酸树脂标本:一项体外研究。

IF 3.9 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Caroline Vieira Fortes, Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro, Bart De Wever, Amina Sakly, Viviane De Cássia Oliveira, Lorena Mosconi Clemente, Evandro Watanabe, Cláudia Helena Silva-Lovato
{"title":"生物膜形成的评价,粘接强度和清洁方案的有效性对含粘合剂的丙烯酸树脂标本:一项体外研究。","authors":"Caroline Vieira Fortes, Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro, Bart De Wever, Amina Sakly, Viviane De Cássia Oliveira, Lorena Mosconi Clemente, Evandro Watanabe, Cláudia Helena Silva-Lovato","doi":"10.17219/dmp/176231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Denture adhesives promote greater stability and retention of dentures. However, they can also facilitate biofilm formation related to oral diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the influence of 2 adhesives on the microbial load of mixed biofilm and adhesive strength. Additionally, the objective was to assess the effect of 3 hygiene protocols on the microbial load and cell metabolism of this biofilm.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study compared Corega Ultra Cream (CCA) and OlivaFix® Gold (OFA) adhesives by evaluating the biofilm formation of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus mutans by colony-forming unit (CFU), as well as adhesive strength. The implemented hygiene protocols included brushing and immersion in water (BW), 0.15% triclosan (BT0.15%), or 0.25% sodium hypochlorite (BSH0.25%). The control groups were either without adhesive (CG) or without any hygiene protocols (CGwH). The one-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with Tukey's post hoc test and a generalized linear model with Bonferroni adjustment were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The microbial load of C. albicans was higher when OFA was used (p < 0.001). The microbial loads of C. glabrata and S. mutans were similar between adhesives and higher in the CG (p < 0.001). The influence of the adhesives on the microbial load of S. aureus was not statistically significant (p = 0.287). The adhesive strength promoted by OFA was greater and more stable than when CCA was used (p = 0.007). The immersion in sodium hypochlorite led to a reduction in the microbial load of C. albicans (p < 0.001), C. glabrata (p = 0.002) and S. mutans (p = 0.012), independent of the adhesive. For S. aureus, the microbial load was lower with OFA/BSH0.25% (p = 0.022). All hygiene protocols resulted in a decreased cell metabolism when compared to the CGwH (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brushing with BSH0.25% solution was the most effective hygiene protocol, resulting in a reduction in the microbial load and metabolism. This protocol may be recommended as a first-line option for the disinfection of dentures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of biofilm formation, adhesive strength and effectiveness of cleaning protocols on adhesive-containing acrylic resin specimens: An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Vieira Fortes, Adriana Barbosa Ribeiro, Bart De Wever, Amina Sakly, Viviane De Cássia Oliveira, Lorena Mosconi Clemente, Evandro Watanabe, Cláudia Helena Silva-Lovato\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/176231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Denture adhesives promote greater stability and retention of dentures. However, they can also facilitate biofilm formation related to oral diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the influence of 2 adhesives on the microbial load of mixed biofilm and adhesive strength. Additionally, the objective was to assess the effect of 3 hygiene protocols on the microbial load and cell metabolism of this biofilm.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study compared Corega Ultra Cream (CCA) and OlivaFix® Gold (OFA) adhesives by evaluating the biofilm formation of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus mutans by colony-forming unit (CFU), as well as adhesive strength. The implemented hygiene protocols included brushing and immersion in water (BW), 0.15% triclosan (BT0.15%), or 0.25% sodium hypochlorite (BSH0.25%). The control groups were either without adhesive (CG) or without any hygiene protocols (CGwH). The one-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with Tukey's post hoc test and a generalized linear model with Bonferroni adjustment were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The microbial load of C. albicans was higher when OFA was used (p < 0.001). The microbial loads of C. glabrata and S. mutans were similar between adhesives and higher in the CG (p < 0.001). The influence of the adhesives on the microbial load of S. aureus was not statistically significant (p = 0.287). The adhesive strength promoted by OFA was greater and more stable than when CCA was used (p = 0.007). The immersion in sodium hypochlorite led to a reduction in the microbial load of C. albicans (p < 0.001), C. glabrata (p = 0.002) and S. mutans (p = 0.012), independent of the adhesive. For S. aureus, the microbial load was lower with OFA/BSH0.25% (p = 0.022). All hygiene protocols resulted in a decreased cell metabolism when compared to the CGwH (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brushing with BSH0.25% solution was the most effective hygiene protocol, resulting in a reduction in the microbial load and metabolism. This protocol may be recommended as a first-line option for the disinfection of dentures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/176231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/176231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:义齿粘接剂促进义齿的稳定性和固位。然而,它们也可以促进与口腔疾病相关的生物膜的形成。目的:评价两种胶粘剂对混合生物膜微生物负荷及胶粘剂强度的影响。此外,目的是评估3种卫生方案对该生物膜的微生物负荷和细胞代谢的影响。材料和方法:本研究通过菌落形成单位(CFU)评估白色念珠菌、光秃念珠菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和变形链球菌的生物膜形成以及粘附强度,对Corega Ultra Cream (CCA)和OlivaFix®Gold (OFA)粘合剂进行比较。实施的卫生方案包括刷牙和浸泡在水中(BW)、0.15%三氯生(BT0.15%)或0.25%次氯酸钠(BSH0.25%)。对照组不使用黏合剂(CG)或不使用任何卫生方案(CGwH)。统计学分析采用单向和双向方差分析(ANOVAs),采用Tukey事后检验,采用Bonferroni调整的广义线性模型(α = 0.05)。结果:使用OFA时,白色念珠菌的微生物载量较高(p < 0.001)。在不同的黏合剂中,光斑弧菌和变形弧菌的微生物负荷基本相同,但黏合剂中的细菌负荷高于黏合剂(p < 0.001)。胶粘剂对金黄色葡萄球菌微生物负荷的影响无统计学意义(p = 0.287)。与CCA相比,OFA促进的粘接强度更大、更稳定(p = 0.007)。浸泡在次氯酸钠中导致白色念珠菌(p < 0.001)、光滑念珠菌(p = 0.002)和变形念珠菌(p = 0.012)的微生物负荷减少,与粘接剂无关。金黄色葡萄球菌的微生物负荷较低,OFA/BSH0.25% (p = 0.022)。与CGwH相比,所有卫生方案均导致细胞代谢降低(p < 0.001)。结论:用BSH0.25%溶液刷牙是最有效的卫生方案,可减少微生物负荷和代谢。该方案可推荐作为假牙消毒的一线选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of biofilm formation, adhesive strength and effectiveness of cleaning protocols on adhesive-containing acrylic resin specimens: An in vitro study.

Background: Denture adhesives promote greater stability and retention of dentures. However, they can also facilitate biofilm formation related to oral diseases.

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of 2 adhesives on the microbial load of mixed biofilm and adhesive strength. Additionally, the objective was to assess the effect of 3 hygiene protocols on the microbial load and cell metabolism of this biofilm.

Material and methods: The study compared Corega Ultra Cream (CCA) and OlivaFix® Gold (OFA) adhesives by evaluating the biofilm formation of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus mutans by colony-forming unit (CFU), as well as adhesive strength. The implemented hygiene protocols included brushing and immersion in water (BW), 0.15% triclosan (BT0.15%), or 0.25% sodium hypochlorite (BSH0.25%). The control groups were either without adhesive (CG) or without any hygiene protocols (CGwH). The one-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) with Tukey's post hoc test and a generalized linear model with Bonferroni adjustment were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05).

Results: The microbial load of C. albicans was higher when OFA was used (p < 0.001). The microbial loads of C. glabrata and S. mutans were similar between adhesives and higher in the CG (p < 0.001). The influence of the adhesives on the microbial load of S. aureus was not statistically significant (p = 0.287). The adhesive strength promoted by OFA was greater and more stable than when CCA was used (p = 0.007). The immersion in sodium hypochlorite led to a reduction in the microbial load of C. albicans (p < 0.001), C. glabrata (p = 0.002) and S. mutans (p = 0.012), independent of the adhesive. For S. aureus, the microbial load was lower with OFA/BSH0.25% (p = 0.022). All hygiene protocols resulted in a decreased cell metabolism when compared to the CGwH (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Brushing with BSH0.25% solution was the most effective hygiene protocol, resulting in a reduction in the microbial load and metabolism. This protocol may be recommended as a first-line option for the disinfection of dentures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信