{"title":"术中右美托咪定增强心脏手术术后微循环并减少急性肾损伤:一项双盲随机试验。","authors":"Po-Yuan Shih, Tsung-Ta Wu, Kuang-Cheng Chan, Ron-Bin Hsu, Ching-Tao Chang, Wei-Han Chou, Chun-Yu Wu","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S541433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has shown potential benefits in various surgical settings, but its impact on microcirculation and renal function in cardiac surgery patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a single university hospital. Seventy patients undergoing non-emergency cardiac and aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled, and 68 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg loading dose, followed by 0.5 mcg/kg/h) or saline. The infusion of dexmedetomidine or saline began at anesthesia induction and continued until the end of surgery. Key microcirculatory variables-total vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, perfused vessel density, De Backer's score, microvascular flow index, and heterogeneity index-were measured at five time points: baseline, 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 hour after arrival in the intensive care unit, 24 hours after surgery, and 48 hours after surgery. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference correction. Intraoperative urine output, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury, and other postoperative complications were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the dexmedetomidine group maintained higher postoperative proportion of perfused vessels and perfused vessel density compared to the saline group, with a significant interaction effect for perfused vessel density. Baseline perfused vessel density was comparable between the two study groups (17.5 [15.9-18.6] vs 18.0 [16.1-19.8] mm/mm², p = 0.540). At 48 hours postoperatively, patients in the dexmedetomidine group had significantly higher PVD values than those in the saline group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] vs 15.6 [13.7-16.9] mm/mm²; P = 0.041). The dexmedetomidine group also had significantly higher intraoperative urine output (950 vs 605 mL, p = 0.002). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (11.8% vs 50%, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion during cardiac surgery is associated with higher postoperative microcirculatory state and a reduced incidence of acute kidney injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"8451-8462"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Enhances Postoperative Microcirculation and Reduces Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiac Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Po-Yuan Shih, Tsung-Ta Wu, Kuang-Cheng Chan, Ron-Bin Hsu, Ching-Tao Chang, Wei-Han Chou, Chun-Yu Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S541433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has shown potential benefits in various surgical settings, but its impact on microcirculation and renal function in cardiac surgery patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a single university hospital. Seventy patients undergoing non-emergency cardiac and aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled, and 68 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg loading dose, followed by 0.5 mcg/kg/h) or saline. The infusion of dexmedetomidine or saline began at anesthesia induction and continued until the end of surgery. Key microcirculatory variables-total vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, perfused vessel density, De Backer's score, microvascular flow index, and heterogeneity index-were measured at five time points: baseline, 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 hour after arrival in the intensive care unit, 24 hours after surgery, and 48 hours after surgery. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference correction. Intraoperative urine output, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury, and other postoperative complications were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the dexmedetomidine group maintained higher postoperative proportion of perfused vessels and perfused vessel density compared to the saline group, with a significant interaction effect for perfused vessel density. Baseline perfused vessel density was comparable between the two study groups (17.5 [15.9-18.6] vs 18.0 [16.1-19.8] mm/mm², p = 0.540). At 48 hours postoperatively, patients in the dexmedetomidine group had significantly higher PVD values than those in the saline group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] vs 15.6 [13.7-16.9] mm/mm²; P = 0.041). The dexmedetomidine group also had significantly higher intraoperative urine output (950 vs 605 mL, p = 0.002). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (11.8% vs 50%, p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion during cardiac surgery is associated with higher postoperative microcirculatory state and a reduced incidence of acute kidney injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"8451-8462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12452957/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S541433\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S541433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:右美托咪定是一种α -2肾上腺素能激动剂,在各种手术环境中显示出潜在的益处,但其对心脏手术患者微循环和肾功能的影响尚不清楚。患者和方法:这项随机、对照、双盲临床试验在一所大学医院进行。70例接受非紧急心脏和主动脉手术需要体外循环的患者被纳入研究,68例患者被纳入最终分析。患者随机接受右美托咪定(0.5 mcg/kg负荷剂量,随后接受0.5 mcg/kg/h)或生理盐水治疗。右美托咪定或生理盐水的输注从麻醉诱导开始,一直持续到手术结束。在基线、体外循环术后1小时、到达重症监护病房后1小时、术后24小时和术后48小时五个时间点测量关键微循环变量——血管总密度、灌注血管比例、灌注血管密度、De Backer评分、微血管流量指数和异质性指数。数据分析采用混合效应模型,并采用Tukey's honest显著差异校正。比较术中尿量、术后急性肾损伤发生率及其他术后并发症。结果:右美托咪定组患者术后灌注血管比例和灌注血管密度均高于生理盐水组,且灌注血管密度相互作用显著。两个研究组的基线灌注血管密度相当(17.5 [15.9-18.6]vs 18.0 [16.1-19.8] mm/mm²,p = 0.540)。术后48小时,右美托咪定组患者PVD值明显高于生理盐水组(17.0 [15.0-19.0]vs 15.6 [13.7-16.9] mm/mm²;P = 0.041)。右美托咪定组术中尿量也显著增加(950 vs 605 mL, p = 0.002)。此外,右美托咪定组术后急性肾损伤发生率显著降低(11.8% vs 50%, p = 0.001)。结论:心脏手术中右美托咪定输注可提高术后微循环状态,降低急性肾损伤发生率。
Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Enhances Postoperative Microcirculation and Reduces Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiac Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.
Purpose: Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has shown potential benefits in various surgical settings, but its impact on microcirculation and renal function in cardiac surgery patients remains unclear.
Patients and methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at a single university hospital. Seventy patients undergoing non-emergency cardiac and aortic surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled, and 68 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg loading dose, followed by 0.5 mcg/kg/h) or saline. The infusion of dexmedetomidine or saline began at anesthesia induction and continued until the end of surgery. Key microcirculatory variables-total vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, perfused vessel density, De Backer's score, microvascular flow index, and heterogeneity index-were measured at five time points: baseline, 1 hour after cardiopulmonary bypass, 1 hour after arrival in the intensive care unit, 24 hours after surgery, and 48 hours after surgery. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference correction. Intraoperative urine output, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury, and other postoperative complications were also compared.
Results: Patients in the dexmedetomidine group maintained higher postoperative proportion of perfused vessels and perfused vessel density compared to the saline group, with a significant interaction effect for perfused vessel density. Baseline perfused vessel density was comparable between the two study groups (17.5 [15.9-18.6] vs 18.0 [16.1-19.8] mm/mm², p = 0.540). At 48 hours postoperatively, patients in the dexmedetomidine group had significantly higher PVD values than those in the saline group (17.0 [15.0-19.0] vs 15.6 [13.7-16.9] mm/mm²; P = 0.041). The dexmedetomidine group also had significantly higher intraoperative urine output (950 vs 605 mL, p = 0.002). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group (11.8% vs 50%, p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion during cardiac surgery is associated with higher postoperative microcirculatory state and a reduced incidence of acute kidney injury.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.