{"title":"口服抗凝患者PCI术后1个月后阿司匹林与氯吡格雷的比较。","authors":"Masahiro Natsuaki, Hirotoshi Watanabe, Takeshi Morimoto, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kenji Ando, Satoru Suwa, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Hiroyuki Takenaka, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Toshihiro Tamura, Kandoh Kawahatsu, Fujio Hayashi, Masaharu Akao, Takeshi Serikawa, Hiroyoshi Mori, Takayuki Kawamura, Arata Hagikura, Naoki Shibata, Koh Ono, Takeshi Kimura","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There were no previous studies comparing aspirin with clopidogrel on top of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention when dual therapy with OAC and clopidogrel was recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by OAC in the 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3), which randomly compared 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) with 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This subgroup analysis compared aspirin with clopidogrel in patients with or without OAC by the 30-day landmark analysis. The coprimary end points were the cardiovascular (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke), and bleeding end points (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 30-day landmark analysis (N=5809), there were 788 patients (13.6%) with OAC at discharge. Regardless of OAC, the incidence rates beyond 30 days up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for cardiovascular end point (OAC: 3.7% versus 3.9%, hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.44-1.93]; no OAC: 3.7% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.77-1.38]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.78) and for bleeding end point (OAC: 3.5% versus 4.2%, hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.39-1.73]; no OAC 1.5% versus 1.4%, hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.66-1.72]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aspirin compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 30 days and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of OAC at discharge.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04609111.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e015495"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel Beyond 1 Month After PCI in Patients With Oral Anticoagulation.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Natsuaki, Hirotoshi Watanabe, Takeshi Morimoto, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kenji Ando, Satoru Suwa, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Hiroyuki Takenaka, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Toshihiro Tamura, Kandoh Kawahatsu, Fujio Hayashi, Masaharu Akao, Takeshi Serikawa, Hiroyoshi Mori, Takayuki Kawamura, Arata Hagikura, Naoki Shibata, Koh Ono, Takeshi Kimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There were no previous studies comparing aspirin with clopidogrel on top of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention when dual therapy with OAC and clopidogrel was recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by OAC in the 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3), which randomly compared 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) with 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This subgroup analysis compared aspirin with clopidogrel in patients with or without OAC by the 30-day landmark analysis. The coprimary end points were the cardiovascular (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke), and bleeding end points (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 30-day landmark analysis (N=5809), there were 788 patients (13.6%) with OAC at discharge. Regardless of OAC, the incidence rates beyond 30 days up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for cardiovascular end point (OAC: 3.7% versus 3.9%, hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.44-1.93]; no OAC: 3.7% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.77-1.38]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.78) and for bleeding end point (OAC: 3.5% versus 4.2%, hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.39-1.73]; no OAC 1.5% versus 1.4%, hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.66-1.72]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aspirin compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 30 days and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of OAC at discharge.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04609111.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e015495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel Beyond 1 Month After PCI in Patients With Oral Anticoagulation.
Background: There were no previous studies comparing aspirin with clopidogrel on top of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention when dual therapy with OAC and clopidogrel was recommended.
Methods: We conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by OAC in the 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3), which randomly compared 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) with 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This subgroup analysis compared aspirin with clopidogrel in patients with or without OAC by the 30-day landmark analysis. The coprimary end points were the cardiovascular (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke), and bleeding end points (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5).
Results: In the 30-day landmark analysis (N=5809), there were 788 patients (13.6%) with OAC at discharge. Regardless of OAC, the incidence rates beyond 30 days up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for cardiovascular end point (OAC: 3.7% versus 3.9%, hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.44-1.93]; no OAC: 3.7% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.77-1.38]; P interaction=0.78) and for bleeding end point (OAC: 3.5% versus 4.2%, hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.39-1.73]; no OAC 1.5% versus 1.4%, hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.66-1.72]; P interaction=0.57).
Conclusions: Aspirin compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 30 days and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of OAC at discharge.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.