口服抗凝患者PCI术后1个月后阿司匹林与氯吡格雷的比较。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Masahiro Natsuaki, Hirotoshi Watanabe, Takeshi Morimoto, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kenji Ando, Satoru Suwa, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Hiroyuki Takenaka, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Toshihiro Tamura, Kandoh Kawahatsu, Fujio Hayashi, Masaharu Akao, Takeshi Serikawa, Hiroyoshi Mori, Takayuki Kawamura, Arata Hagikura, Naoki Shibata, Koh Ono, Takeshi Kimura
{"title":"口服抗凝患者PCI术后1个月后阿司匹林与氯吡格雷的比较。","authors":"Masahiro Natsuaki, Hirotoshi Watanabe, Takeshi Morimoto, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kenji Ando, Satoru Suwa, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Hiroyuki Takenaka, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Toshihiro Tamura, Kandoh Kawahatsu, Fujio Hayashi, Masaharu Akao, Takeshi Serikawa, Hiroyoshi Mori, Takayuki Kawamura, Arata Hagikura, Naoki Shibata, Koh Ono, Takeshi Kimura","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There were no previous studies comparing aspirin with clopidogrel on top of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention when dual therapy with OAC and clopidogrel was recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by OAC in the 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3), which randomly compared 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) with 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This subgroup analysis compared aspirin with clopidogrel in patients with or without OAC by the 30-day landmark analysis. The coprimary end points were the cardiovascular (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke), and bleeding end points (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 30-day landmark analysis (N=5809), there were 788 patients (13.6%) with OAC at discharge. Regardless of OAC, the incidence rates beyond 30 days up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for cardiovascular end point (OAC: 3.7% versus 3.9%, hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.44-1.93]; no OAC: 3.7% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.77-1.38]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.78) and for bleeding end point (OAC: 3.5% versus 4.2%, hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.39-1.73]; no OAC 1.5% versus 1.4%, hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.66-1.72]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aspirin compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 30 days and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of OAC at discharge.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04609111.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e015495"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel Beyond 1 Month After PCI in Patients With Oral Anticoagulation.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Natsuaki, Hirotoshi Watanabe, Takeshi Morimoto, Ko Yamamoto, Yuki Obayashi, Ryusuke Nishikawa, Tomoya Kimura, Kenji Ando, Satoru Suwa, Tsuyoshi Isawa, Hiroyuki Takenaka, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Toshihiro Tamura, Kandoh Kawahatsu, Fujio Hayashi, Masaharu Akao, Takeshi Serikawa, Hiroyoshi Mori, Takayuki Kawamura, Arata Hagikura, Naoki Shibata, Koh Ono, Takeshi Kimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There were no previous studies comparing aspirin with clopidogrel on top of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention when dual therapy with OAC and clopidogrel was recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by OAC in the 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3), which randomly compared 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) with 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This subgroup analysis compared aspirin with clopidogrel in patients with or without OAC by the 30-day landmark analysis. The coprimary end points were the cardiovascular (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke), and bleeding end points (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 30-day landmark analysis (N=5809), there were 788 patients (13.6%) with OAC at discharge. Regardless of OAC, the incidence rates beyond 30 days up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for cardiovascular end point (OAC: 3.7% versus 3.9%, hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.44-1.93]; no OAC: 3.7% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.77-1.38]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.78) and for bleeding end point (OAC: 3.5% versus 4.2%, hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.39-1.73]; no OAC 1.5% versus 1.4%, hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.66-1.72]; <i>P</i> interaction=0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aspirin compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 30 days and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of OAC at discharge.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04609111.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e015495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015495","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后1年内推荐口服抗凝剂(OAC)和氯吡格雷双联治疗的情况下,既往没有比较阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的研究。方法:我们对stopdpt -3试验(Short and Optimal Duration of Dual anti -血小板治疗-3)进行1年随访,按OAC分层进行亚组分析,随机比较1个月的双抗血小板治疗合并阿司匹林单药治疗(阿司匹林组)与1个月的普拉格雷单药治疗合并氯吡格雷单药治疗(氯吡格雷组)。该亚组分析通过30天里程碑分析比较了有或无OAC患者的阿司匹林和氯吡格雷。主要终点是心血管终点(心血管死亡、心肌梗死、明确支架血栓形成或缺血性卒中的复合终点)和出血终点(出血学术研究联盟3或5)。结果:在30天的里程碑分析中(N=5809),有788例(13.6%)患者在出院时出现OAC。不管OAC,发病率超过30天到1年类似阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组之间对心血管终点(OAC: 3.7%和3.9%,风险比0.92 (95% CI, 0.44 - -1.93);没有OAC: 3.7%和3.6%;风险比,1.03(95%可信区间,0.77 - -1.38);P = 0.78)交互和出血终点(OAC: 3.5%和4.2%,风险比0.82 (95% CI, 0.39 - -1.73);没有OAC 1.5%与1.4%,风险比,1.07(95%可信区间,0.66 - -1.72);P = 0.57)交互。结论:与氯吡格雷相比,阿司匹林与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后30天和长达1年的心血管和出血结局相似,无论出院时OAC如何。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT04609111。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel Beyond 1 Month After PCI in Patients With Oral Anticoagulation.

Background: There were no previous studies comparing aspirin with clopidogrel on top of oral anticoagulation (OAC) within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention when dual therapy with OAC and clopidogrel was recommended.

Methods: We conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by OAC in the 1-year follow-up of the STOPDAPT-3 trial (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3), which randomly compared 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group) with 1-month prasugrel monotherapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group). This subgroup analysis compared aspirin with clopidogrel in patients with or without OAC by the 30-day landmark analysis. The coprimary end points were the cardiovascular (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke), and bleeding end points (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5).

Results: In the 30-day landmark analysis (N=5809), there were 788 patients (13.6%) with OAC at discharge. Regardless of OAC, the incidence rates beyond 30 days up to 1 year were similar between the aspirin and clopidogrel groups for cardiovascular end point (OAC: 3.7% versus 3.9%, hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.44-1.93]; no OAC: 3.7% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.77-1.38]; P interaction=0.78) and for bleeding end point (OAC: 3.5% versus 4.2%, hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.39-1.73]; no OAC 1.5% versus 1.4%, hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.66-1.72]; P interaction=0.57).

Conclusions: Aspirin compared with clopidogrel was associated with similar cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes beyond 30 days and up to 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention regardless of OAC at discharge.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04609111.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信