Emma Weltings, Merel C. Postema, Maureen van Dam, Mark A. Dubbelman, Mukrabe E. Tewolde, Flora H. Duits, Afina W. Lemstra, The LEADS consortium, Bradford C. Dickerson, Maria C. Carrillo, Gil D. Rabinovici, Dustin B. Hammers, Wiesje M. Van der Flier, Liana G. Apostolova, Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg, Sietske A. M. Sikkes
{"title":"年轻痴呆患者的日常功能：诊断组之间的差异。","authors":"Emma Weltings, Merel C. Postema, Maureen van Dam, Mark A. Dubbelman, Mukrabe E. Tewolde, Flora H. Duits, Afina W. Lemstra, The LEADS consortium, Bradford C. Dickerson, Maria C. Carrillo, Gil D. Rabinovici, Dustin B. Hammers, Wiesje M. Van der Flier, Liana G. Apostolova, Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg, Sietske A. M. Sikkes","doi":"10.1002/alz.70711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to examine differences in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) among young-onset dementia (YOD) diagnoses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were included from Amsterdam Dementia and Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LEADS) cohorts, with diagnoses of typical Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) established in multidisciplinary meetings. We compared overall IADL scores and item level scores between groups using multiple regression analyses, adjusted for cohort, demographics, and disease severity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>We included 582 YOD patients (58.4 ± 4.2 years; 59%F), with overall moderate IADL problems (47.5 ± 8.57). DLB patients showed the most IADL difficulties (41.8 ± 7.8) compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA (adjusted β range 4.62 to 14.14, all <i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas PPA patients showed the least IADL difficulties (55.8 ± 9.83), with item-specific differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> CONCLUSION</h3>\n \n <p>We found differences in everyday functioning between YOD types. Understanding IADL in YOD types will assist in care planning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Patients with DLB showed the most IADL difficulties compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA</li>\n \n <li>Patients with PPA showed the least IADL difficulties compared to DLB, PCA, typical AD, and bvFTD</li>\n \n <li>We identified diagnostic group-specific activity challenges. While ‘working’ was among the most commonly impaired activities across al groups, distinct functional challenges emerged per diagnosis: for example, DLB had high impairment in financial tasks, PCA patients in visual-spatial tasks, and bvFTD with planning and organizational activities (e.g. making appointments).</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70711","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Everyday functioning in young onset dementia: differences between diagnostic groups\",\"authors\":\"Emma Weltings, Merel C. Postema, Maureen van Dam, Mark A. Dubbelman, Mukrabe E. Tewolde, Flora H. Duits, Afina W. Lemstra, The LEADS consortium, Bradford C. Dickerson, Maria C. Carrillo, Gil D. Rabinovici, Dustin B. Hammers, Wiesje M. Van der Flier, Liana G. Apostolova, Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg, Sietske A. M. Sikkes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alz.70711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to examine differences in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) among young-onset dementia (YOD) diagnoses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants were included from Amsterdam Dementia and Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LEADS) cohorts, with diagnoses of typical Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) established in multidisciplinary meetings. We compared overall IADL scores and item level scores between groups using multiple regression analyses, adjusted for cohort, demographics, and disease severity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 582 YOD patients (58.4 ± 4.2 years; 59%F), with overall moderate IADL problems (47.5 ± 8.57). DLB patients showed the most IADL difficulties (41.8 ± 7.8) compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA (adjusted β range 4.62 to 14.14, all <i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas PPA patients showed the least IADL difficulties (55.8 ± 9.83), with item-specific differences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> CONCLUSION</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found differences in everyday functioning between YOD types. Understanding IADL in YOD types will assist in care planning.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Patients with DLB showed the most IADL difficulties compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA</li>\\n \\n <li>Patients with PPA showed the least IADL difficulties compared to DLB, PCA, typical AD, and bvFTD</li>\\n \\n <li>We identified diagnostic group-specific activity challenges. While ‘working’ was among the most commonly impaired activities across al groups, distinct functional challenges emerged per diagnosis: for example, DLB had high impairment in financial tasks, PCA patients in visual-spatial tasks, and bvFTD with planning and organizational activities (e.g. making appointments).</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"volume\":\"21 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70711\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's & Dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70711\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70711","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Everyday functioning in young onset dementia: differences between diagnostic groups
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to examine differences in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) among young-onset dementia (YOD) diagnoses.
METHODS
Participants were included from Amsterdam Dementia and Longitudinal Early-Onset Alzheimer's Disease (LEADS) cohorts, with diagnoses of typical Alzheimer's disease (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) established in multidisciplinary meetings. We compared overall IADL scores and item level scores between groups using multiple regression analyses, adjusted for cohort, demographics, and disease severity.
RESULTS
We included 582 YOD patients (58.4 ± 4.2 years; 59%F), with overall moderate IADL problems (47.5 ± 8.57). DLB patients showed the most IADL difficulties (41.8 ± 7.8) compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA (adjusted β range 4.62 to 14.14, all p < 0.01), whereas PPA patients showed the least IADL difficulties (55.8 ± 9.83), with item-specific differences.
CONCLUSION
We found differences in everyday functioning between YOD types. Understanding IADL in YOD types will assist in care planning.
Highlights
Patients with DLB showed the most IADL difficulties compared to PCA, typical AD, bvFTD, and PPA
Patients with PPA showed the least IADL difficulties compared to DLB, PCA, typical AD, and bvFTD
We identified diagnostic group-specific activity challenges. While ‘working’ was among the most commonly impaired activities across al groups, distinct functional challenges emerged per diagnosis: for example, DLB had high impairment in financial tasks, PCA patients in visual-spatial tasks, and bvFTD with planning and organizational activities (e.g. making appointments).
期刊介绍：
Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
