大陆尺度土壤监测:土壤质量的多尺度框架

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Grant A. Campbell, Pete Smith, Nils Broothaerts, Panos Panagos, Arwyn Jones, Cristiano Ballabio, Daniele De Rosa, Lis Wollesen de Jonge, Emmanuel Arthur, Lucas Gomes, Nima Shokri, Mehdi Afshar, Gergely Tóth, Peter Lehmann, Pasquale Borrelli, Christine Alewell, Robert Minarik, Tomislav Hengl, Ichsani Wheeler, Lindsay Maskell, Madlene Nussbaum, Laurence Jones, Christopher J. Feeney, David A. Robinson
{"title":"大陆尺度土壤监测:土壤质量的多尺度框架","authors":"Grant A. Campbell,&nbsp;Pete Smith,&nbsp;Nils Broothaerts,&nbsp;Panos Panagos,&nbsp;Arwyn Jones,&nbsp;Cristiano Ballabio,&nbsp;Daniele De Rosa,&nbsp;Lis Wollesen de Jonge,&nbsp;Emmanuel Arthur,&nbsp;Lucas Gomes,&nbsp;Nima Shokri,&nbsp;Mehdi Afshar,&nbsp;Gergely Tóth,&nbsp;Peter Lehmann,&nbsp;Pasquale Borrelli,&nbsp;Christine Alewell,&nbsp;Robert Minarik,&nbsp;Tomislav Hengl,&nbsp;Ichsani Wheeler,&nbsp;Lindsay Maskell,&nbsp;Madlene Nussbaum,&nbsp;Laurence Jones,&nbsp;Christopher J. Feeney,&nbsp;David A. Robinson","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Globally, soils are subjected to various management practices and stressors which can lead to degradation. This makes their protection essential for sustaining many functions and services as well as maintaining the overall life support system of Earth. National monitoring programmes are increasingly implemented to evaluate the state and trend of soils, a move which has been advocated by the Mission Soil in Europe. In soil science, frameworks have been established to interpret and communicate soil monitoring results, concentrating on the concept of quality, a term which can be interpreted in many ways. This paper explores the multifaceted meaning of soil quality, addressing its implications for future soil health assessments. It achieves this by focusing on the context of the Mission Soil. Soil health is a holistic concept embracing emergence, complexity and highlighting long-term vitality and resilience. In contrast, soil quality is often viewed through the lens of its capacity to meet specific human needs and functions, typically in a shorter timeframe. The concept of quality is assessed through indicators where the choice of framework significantly influences selection and interpretation. However, selecting appropriate soil indicators across Europe is challenging due to diverse climate, topography, geology and soil types, resulting in varied soil processes. Therefore, establishing clear principles and criteria for soil indicator selection is essential. Our paper identifies four distinct frameworks for soil quality assessment: ‘Fitness for Purpose’, ‘Free from Degradation’, ‘External Benchmarking’ and ‘Value Assessment’, with each possessing a unique role and application. Notably, the ‘Free from Degradation’ framework is emphasised for its alignment with soil protection efforts and its relevance to soil threats. This makes it particularly suitable for pan-European assessments conducted by the European Union Soil Observatory (EUSO).</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70174","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continental Scale Soil Monitoring: A Proposed Multi-Scale Framing of Soil Quality\",\"authors\":\"Grant A. Campbell,&nbsp;Pete Smith,&nbsp;Nils Broothaerts,&nbsp;Panos Panagos,&nbsp;Arwyn Jones,&nbsp;Cristiano Ballabio,&nbsp;Daniele De Rosa,&nbsp;Lis Wollesen de Jonge,&nbsp;Emmanuel Arthur,&nbsp;Lucas Gomes,&nbsp;Nima Shokri,&nbsp;Mehdi Afshar,&nbsp;Gergely Tóth,&nbsp;Peter Lehmann,&nbsp;Pasquale Borrelli,&nbsp;Christine Alewell,&nbsp;Robert Minarik,&nbsp;Tomislav Hengl,&nbsp;Ichsani Wheeler,&nbsp;Lindsay Maskell,&nbsp;Madlene Nussbaum,&nbsp;Laurence Jones,&nbsp;Christopher J. Feeney,&nbsp;David A. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Globally, soils are subjected to various management practices and stressors which can lead to degradation. This makes their protection essential for sustaining many functions and services as well as maintaining the overall life support system of Earth. National monitoring programmes are increasingly implemented to evaluate the state and trend of soils, a move which has been advocated by the Mission Soil in Europe. In soil science, frameworks have been established to interpret and communicate soil monitoring results, concentrating on the concept of quality, a term which can be interpreted in many ways. This paper explores the multifaceted meaning of soil quality, addressing its implications for future soil health assessments. It achieves this by focusing on the context of the Mission Soil. Soil health is a holistic concept embracing emergence, complexity and highlighting long-term vitality and resilience. In contrast, soil quality is often viewed through the lens of its capacity to meet specific human needs and functions, typically in a shorter timeframe. The concept of quality is assessed through indicators where the choice of framework significantly influences selection and interpretation. However, selecting appropriate soil indicators across Europe is challenging due to diverse climate, topography, geology and soil types, resulting in varied soil processes. Therefore, establishing clear principles and criteria for soil indicator selection is essential. Our paper identifies four distinct frameworks for soil quality assessment: ‘Fitness for Purpose’, ‘Free from Degradation’, ‘External Benchmarking’ and ‘Value Assessment’, with each possessing a unique role and application. Notably, the ‘Free from Degradation’ framework is emphasised for its alignment with soil protection efforts and its relevance to soil threats. This makes it particularly suitable for pan-European assessments conducted by the European Union Soil Observatory (EUSO).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70174\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,土壤受到各种管理措施和可能导致退化的压力因素的影响。这使得它们的保护对于维持许多功能和服务以及维持地球的整体生命支持系统至关重要。越来越多地实施国家监测方案,以评估土壤的状况和趋势,这是欧洲土壤特派团所提倡的一项举措。在土壤科学中,已经建立了解释和交流土壤监测结果的框架,重点是质量的概念,这个术语可以用多种方式解释。本文探讨了土壤质量的多方面意义,解决了其对未来土壤健康评估的影响。它通过关注任务土壤的背景来实现这一点。土壤健康是一个整体概念,包含突发性、复杂性,强调长期活力和复原力。相比之下,土壤质量通常是通过其满足人类特定需求和功能的能力来看待的,通常是在较短的时间内。质量概念通过指标进行评估,其中框架的选择显著影响选择和解释。然而,由于气候、地形、地质和土壤类型的差异,在欧洲各地选择合适的土壤指标具有挑战性,从而导致土壤过程的变化。因此,建立明确的土壤指标选择原则和标准至关重要。我们的论文确定了土壤质量评估的四个不同框架:“适合目的”、“免于退化”、“外部基准”和“价值评估”,每个框架都具有独特的作用和应用。值得注意的是,“免于退化”框架因其与土壤保护工作的一致性以及与土壤威胁的相关性而得到强调。这使得它特别适合由欧洲联盟土壤观测站(EUSO)进行的泛欧评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Continental Scale Soil Monitoring: A Proposed Multi-Scale Framing of Soil Quality

Continental Scale Soil Monitoring: A Proposed Multi-Scale Framing of Soil Quality

Continental Scale Soil Monitoring: A Proposed Multi-Scale Framing of Soil Quality

Continental Scale Soil Monitoring: A Proposed Multi-Scale Framing of Soil Quality

Globally, soils are subjected to various management practices and stressors which can lead to degradation. This makes their protection essential for sustaining many functions and services as well as maintaining the overall life support system of Earth. National monitoring programmes are increasingly implemented to evaluate the state and trend of soils, a move which has been advocated by the Mission Soil in Europe. In soil science, frameworks have been established to interpret and communicate soil monitoring results, concentrating on the concept of quality, a term which can be interpreted in many ways. This paper explores the multifaceted meaning of soil quality, addressing its implications for future soil health assessments. It achieves this by focusing on the context of the Mission Soil. Soil health is a holistic concept embracing emergence, complexity and highlighting long-term vitality and resilience. In contrast, soil quality is often viewed through the lens of its capacity to meet specific human needs and functions, typically in a shorter timeframe. The concept of quality is assessed through indicators where the choice of framework significantly influences selection and interpretation. However, selecting appropriate soil indicators across Europe is challenging due to diverse climate, topography, geology and soil types, resulting in varied soil processes. Therefore, establishing clear principles and criteria for soil indicator selection is essential. Our paper identifies four distinct frameworks for soil quality assessment: ‘Fitness for Purpose’, ‘Free from Degradation’, ‘External Benchmarking’ and ‘Value Assessment’, with each possessing a unique role and application. Notably, the ‘Free from Degradation’ framework is emphasised for its alignment with soil protection efforts and its relevance to soil threats. This makes it particularly suitable for pan-European assessments conducted by the European Union Soil Observatory (EUSO).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信