Luis Alejandro Guanoluiza Pineida , Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata , Mauricio Aguirre Balseca , Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas , Alex Dario Ganan
{"title":"不同面部类型的成人患者腭骨厚度:正畸微型计划的回顾性横断面CBCT研究","authors":"Luis Alejandro Guanoluiza Pineida , Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata , Mauricio Aguirre Balseca , Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas , Alex Dario Ganan","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2025.101058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Effective orthodontic anchorage control plays a crucial role in achieving successful treatment outcomes, particularly in cases involving significant tooth movements. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) placed in the midpalatal region have become widely used due to their ability to provide absolute skeletal anchorage without depending on patient compliance. However, anatomical variables such as palatal bone thickness and possible variations according to facial pattern are essential considerations during treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate and compare palatal bone thickness in adult patients with different facial patterns, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), with the aim of identifying possible anatomical differences that may influence TAD placement.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study analyzed 90 CBCT scans obtained between 2022 and 2025 from patients aged 18 to 45 years. The sample was evenly divided into three groups according to facial pattern (30 mesofacial, 30 brachyfacial, and 30 dolichofacial), with equal distribution between sexes and comparable ages. Linear measurements of palatal bone thickness were performed at multiple anteroposterior and lateral reference points using the 3D Slicer 5.8.1 software. Intergroup comparison was performed with Kruskal-Wallis test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A progressive decrease in palatal bone thickness was observed from anterior to posterior regions across all facial types. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any measured location (<em>P</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results suggest that facial pattern does not significantly influence palatal bone thickness in the evaluated regions. Therefore, clinical decisions regarding TAD placement should prioritize individual anatomical characteristics over facial patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"24 1","pages":"Article 101058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palatal bone thickness in adult patients with different facial patterns: A retrospective cross-sectional CBCT study for orthodontic miniscrew planning\",\"authors\":\"Luis Alejandro Guanoluiza Pineida , Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata , Mauricio Aguirre Balseca , Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas , Alex Dario Ganan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ortho.2025.101058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Effective orthodontic anchorage control plays a crucial role in achieving successful treatment outcomes, particularly in cases involving significant tooth movements. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) placed in the midpalatal region have become widely used due to their ability to provide absolute skeletal anchorage without depending on patient compliance. However, anatomical variables such as palatal bone thickness and possible variations according to facial pattern are essential considerations during treatment planning.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate and compare palatal bone thickness in adult patients with different facial patterns, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), with the aim of identifying possible anatomical differences that may influence TAD placement.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study analyzed 90 CBCT scans obtained between 2022 and 2025 from patients aged 18 to 45 years. The sample was evenly divided into three groups according to facial pattern (30 mesofacial, 30 brachyfacial, and 30 dolichofacial), with equal distribution between sexes and comparable ages. Linear measurements of palatal bone thickness were performed at multiple anteroposterior and lateral reference points using the 3D Slicer 5.8.1 software. Intergroup comparison was performed with Kruskal-Wallis test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A progressive decrease in palatal bone thickness was observed from anterior to posterior regions across all facial types. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any measured location (<em>P</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results suggest that facial pattern does not significantly influence palatal bone thickness in the evaluated regions. Therefore, clinical decisions regarding TAD placement should prioritize individual anatomical characteristics over facial patterns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722725000932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722725000932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Palatal bone thickness in adult patients with different facial patterns: A retrospective cross-sectional CBCT study for orthodontic miniscrew planning
Introduction
Effective orthodontic anchorage control plays a crucial role in achieving successful treatment outcomes, particularly in cases involving significant tooth movements. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) placed in the midpalatal region have become widely used due to their ability to provide absolute skeletal anchorage without depending on patient compliance. However, anatomical variables such as palatal bone thickness and possible variations according to facial pattern are essential considerations during treatment planning.
Objective
To evaluate and compare palatal bone thickness in adult patients with different facial patterns, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), with the aim of identifying possible anatomical differences that may influence TAD placement.
Material and methods
This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study analyzed 90 CBCT scans obtained between 2022 and 2025 from patients aged 18 to 45 years. The sample was evenly divided into three groups according to facial pattern (30 mesofacial, 30 brachyfacial, and 30 dolichofacial), with equal distribution between sexes and comparable ages. Linear measurements of palatal bone thickness were performed at multiple anteroposterior and lateral reference points using the 3D Slicer 5.8.1 software. Intergroup comparison was performed with Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results
A progressive decrease in palatal bone thickness was observed from anterior to posterior regions across all facial types. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups at any measured location (P > 0.05).
Conclusion
The results suggest that facial pattern does not significantly influence palatal bone thickness in the evaluated regions. Therefore, clinical decisions regarding TAD placement should prioritize individual anatomical characteristics over facial patterns.
期刊介绍:
Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.