Wenkang Wang , Shuting Liang , Xiaojun Zhu , Jian Yang , Tiancheng Han , Yiwei Xu , Yinjie Lu
{"title":"新型PSRC楼板力学性能的理论、试验和数值研究","authors":"Wenkang Wang , Shuting Liang , Xiaojun Zhu , Jian Yang , Tiancheng Han , Yiwei Xu , Yinjie Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presented a novel prestressed steel reinforced concrete floor (PSRCF) structure designed for heavy-load and large-span applications. The mechanical properties of PSRCF, including cracking load, flexural capacity, and shear strength, were investigated through theoretical analysis, static load tests, and finite element method (FEM) simulations. Results indicated that PSRCF failed primarily in flexure, exhibiting excellent ductility and load-bearing capacity. The stiffness ratio method effectively predicted cracking load, showing a 6.06 % deviation from experimental values, while the partial superposition method provided the most accurate flexural capacity calculation (5.01 % error). Stirrups within the floor showed negligible influence on PSRCF's flexural capacity. Both straight and curved prestressed tendons enhanced the cracking load and peak load of the PSRCF. Specifically, the straight tendons increased the cracking load and peak load by 2.26 % and 4.85 %, respectively, while the curved tendons provided more substantial enhancements of 61.35 % and 38.62 %, respectively. The prestressing level significantly influenced the upward deflection and cracking load of the PSRCF. When the prestressing level increased from 0.4 to 0.75, the midspan upward deflection increased by 122.53 %, while the cracking load and yield load increased by 82.16 % and 5.12 %, respectively. However, the peak load was not significantly affected. For PSRCF designs, it was recommend adopting reinforcement and steel ratios close to the code-specified lower limits. PSRCF exhibited ample shear strength and typically failed in flexure, eliminating the need for excessive stirrups in support areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121445"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical, experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of innovative PSRC floor\",\"authors\":\"Wenkang Wang , Shuting Liang , Xiaojun Zhu , Jian Yang , Tiancheng Han , Yiwei Xu , Yinjie Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presented a novel prestressed steel reinforced concrete floor (PSRCF) structure designed for heavy-load and large-span applications. The mechanical properties of PSRCF, including cracking load, flexural capacity, and shear strength, were investigated through theoretical analysis, static load tests, and finite element method (FEM) simulations. Results indicated that PSRCF failed primarily in flexure, exhibiting excellent ductility and load-bearing capacity. The stiffness ratio method effectively predicted cracking load, showing a 6.06 % deviation from experimental values, while the partial superposition method provided the most accurate flexural capacity calculation (5.01 % error). Stirrups within the floor showed negligible influence on PSRCF's flexural capacity. Both straight and curved prestressed tendons enhanced the cracking load and peak load of the PSRCF. Specifically, the straight tendons increased the cracking load and peak load by 2.26 % and 4.85 %, respectively, while the curved tendons provided more substantial enhancements of 61.35 % and 38.62 %, respectively. The prestressing level significantly influenced the upward deflection and cracking load of the PSRCF. When the prestressing level increased from 0.4 to 0.75, the midspan upward deflection increased by 122.53 %, while the cracking load and yield load increased by 82.16 % and 5.12 %, respectively. However, the peak load was not significantly affected. For PSRCF designs, it was recommend adopting reinforcement and steel ratios close to the code-specified lower limits. PSRCF exhibited ample shear strength and typically failed in flexure, eliminating the need for excessive stirrups in support areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"345 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962501836X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962501836X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Theoretical, experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of innovative PSRC floor
This paper presented a novel prestressed steel reinforced concrete floor (PSRCF) structure designed for heavy-load and large-span applications. The mechanical properties of PSRCF, including cracking load, flexural capacity, and shear strength, were investigated through theoretical analysis, static load tests, and finite element method (FEM) simulations. Results indicated that PSRCF failed primarily in flexure, exhibiting excellent ductility and load-bearing capacity. The stiffness ratio method effectively predicted cracking load, showing a 6.06 % deviation from experimental values, while the partial superposition method provided the most accurate flexural capacity calculation (5.01 % error). Stirrups within the floor showed negligible influence on PSRCF's flexural capacity. Both straight and curved prestressed tendons enhanced the cracking load and peak load of the PSRCF. Specifically, the straight tendons increased the cracking load and peak load by 2.26 % and 4.85 %, respectively, while the curved tendons provided more substantial enhancements of 61.35 % and 38.62 %, respectively. The prestressing level significantly influenced the upward deflection and cracking load of the PSRCF. When the prestressing level increased from 0.4 to 0.75, the midspan upward deflection increased by 122.53 %, while the cracking load and yield load increased by 82.16 % and 5.12 %, respectively. However, the peak load was not significantly affected. For PSRCF designs, it was recommend adopting reinforcement and steel ratios close to the code-specified lower limits. PSRCF exhibited ample shear strength and typically failed in flexure, eliminating the need for excessive stirrups in support areas.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.