新型PSRC楼板力学性能的理论、试验和数值研究

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Wenkang Wang , Shuting Liang , Xiaojun Zhu , Jian Yang , Tiancheng Han , Yiwei Xu , Yinjie Lu
{"title":"新型PSRC楼板力学性能的理论、试验和数值研究","authors":"Wenkang Wang ,&nbsp;Shuting Liang ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Zhu ,&nbsp;Jian Yang ,&nbsp;Tiancheng Han ,&nbsp;Yiwei Xu ,&nbsp;Yinjie Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presented a novel prestressed steel reinforced concrete floor (PSRCF) structure designed for heavy-load and large-span applications. The mechanical properties of PSRCF, including cracking load, flexural capacity, and shear strength, were investigated through theoretical analysis, static load tests, and finite element method (FEM) simulations. Results indicated that PSRCF failed primarily in flexure, exhibiting excellent ductility and load-bearing capacity. The stiffness ratio method effectively predicted cracking load, showing a 6.06 % deviation from experimental values, while the partial superposition method provided the most accurate flexural capacity calculation (5.01 % error). Stirrups within the floor showed negligible influence on PSRCF's flexural capacity. Both straight and curved prestressed tendons enhanced the cracking load and peak load of the PSRCF. Specifically, the straight tendons increased the cracking load and peak load by 2.26 % and 4.85 %, respectively, while the curved tendons provided more substantial enhancements of 61.35 % and 38.62 %, respectively. The prestressing level significantly influenced the upward deflection and cracking load of the PSRCF. When the prestressing level increased from 0.4 to 0.75, the midspan upward deflection increased by 122.53 %, while the cracking load and yield load increased by 82.16 % and 5.12 %, respectively. However, the peak load was not significantly affected. For PSRCF designs, it was recommend adopting reinforcement and steel ratios close to the code-specified lower limits. PSRCF exhibited ample shear strength and typically failed in flexure, eliminating the need for excessive stirrups in support areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121445"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical, experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of innovative PSRC floor\",\"authors\":\"Wenkang Wang ,&nbsp;Shuting Liang ,&nbsp;Xiaojun Zhu ,&nbsp;Jian Yang ,&nbsp;Tiancheng Han ,&nbsp;Yiwei Xu ,&nbsp;Yinjie Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presented a novel prestressed steel reinforced concrete floor (PSRCF) structure designed for heavy-load and large-span applications. The mechanical properties of PSRCF, including cracking load, flexural capacity, and shear strength, were investigated through theoretical analysis, static load tests, and finite element method (FEM) simulations. Results indicated that PSRCF failed primarily in flexure, exhibiting excellent ductility and load-bearing capacity. The stiffness ratio method effectively predicted cracking load, showing a 6.06 % deviation from experimental values, while the partial superposition method provided the most accurate flexural capacity calculation (5.01 % error). Stirrups within the floor showed negligible influence on PSRCF's flexural capacity. Both straight and curved prestressed tendons enhanced the cracking load and peak load of the PSRCF. Specifically, the straight tendons increased the cracking load and peak load by 2.26 % and 4.85 %, respectively, while the curved tendons provided more substantial enhancements of 61.35 % and 38.62 %, respectively. The prestressing level significantly influenced the upward deflection and cracking load of the PSRCF. When the prestressing level increased from 0.4 to 0.75, the midspan upward deflection increased by 122.53 %, while the cracking load and yield load increased by 82.16 % and 5.12 %, respectively. However, the peak load was not significantly affected. For PSRCF designs, it was recommend adopting reinforcement and steel ratios close to the code-specified lower limits. PSRCF exhibited ample shear strength and typically failed in flexure, eliminating the need for excessive stirrups in support areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"345 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962501836X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962501836X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一种适用于重载、大跨度应用的预应力钢筋混凝土楼盖结构。通过理论分析、静载试验和有限元模拟,研究了PSRCF的开裂载荷、抗弯承载力和抗剪强度等力学性能。结果表明,PSRCF主要发生弯曲破坏,具有良好的延性和承载能力。刚度比法能有效预测开裂荷载,与试验值偏差为6.06 %,而部分叠加法的抗弯承载力计算精度最高,误差为5.01 %。地板内的马镫对PSRCF抗弯能力的影响可以忽略不计。直、弯预应力筋均增强了PSRCF的开裂荷载和峰值荷载。其中,直筋的裂缝荷载和峰值荷载分别提高了2.26 %和4.85 %,弯曲筋的裂缝荷载和峰值荷载分别提高了61.35 %和38.62 %。预应力水平对PSRCF的向上挠度和开裂荷载有显著影响。当预应力水平从0.4增加到0.75时,跨中向上挠度增加122.53 %,开裂荷载和屈服荷载分别增加82.16 %和5.12 %。然而,峰值负荷没有受到显著影响。对于PSRCF设计,建议采用接近规范规定的下限的钢筋和钢的比率。PSRCF具有足够的抗剪强度,通常在弯曲时失效,因此无需在支撑区域使用过多的马镫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theoretical, experimental and numerical study on mechanical properties of innovative PSRC floor
This paper presented a novel prestressed steel reinforced concrete floor (PSRCF) structure designed for heavy-load and large-span applications. The mechanical properties of PSRCF, including cracking load, flexural capacity, and shear strength, were investigated through theoretical analysis, static load tests, and finite element method (FEM) simulations. Results indicated that PSRCF failed primarily in flexure, exhibiting excellent ductility and load-bearing capacity. The stiffness ratio method effectively predicted cracking load, showing a 6.06 % deviation from experimental values, while the partial superposition method provided the most accurate flexural capacity calculation (5.01 % error). Stirrups within the floor showed negligible influence on PSRCF's flexural capacity. Both straight and curved prestressed tendons enhanced the cracking load and peak load of the PSRCF. Specifically, the straight tendons increased the cracking load and peak load by 2.26 % and 4.85 %, respectively, while the curved tendons provided more substantial enhancements of 61.35 % and 38.62 %, respectively. The prestressing level significantly influenced the upward deflection and cracking load of the PSRCF. When the prestressing level increased from 0.4 to 0.75, the midspan upward deflection increased by 122.53 %, while the cracking load and yield load increased by 82.16 % and 5.12 %, respectively. However, the peak load was not significantly affected. For PSRCF designs, it was recommend adopting reinforcement and steel ratios close to the code-specified lower limits. PSRCF exhibited ample shear strength and typically failed in flexure, eliminating the need for excessive stirrups in support areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信