{"title":"人工智能和机器学习在天然气水合物热力学研究中的应用综述","authors":"Mahmood Riyadh Atta, , , Akram Fadhl Al-Mahmodi, , , Bhajan Lal*, , , Hakim Abdulrab, , and , Siak Foo Khor, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools for predicting the thermodynamic conditions of gas hydrate systems, offering an efficient and scalable alternative to traditional modeling methods. This review systematically analyzes studies published between 2016 and 2025 using a PRISMA-guided methodology and bibliometric mapping. The analysis reveals a dominant focus on binary water–gas systems (87.5%) and a strong reliance on experimental literature-derived data sets (73.9%). Artificial neural network, support vector regression, and random forest models are the most prevalent algorithms, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and root mean square error as the primary evaluation metrics, though the lack of uncertainty quantification remains a significant limitation. Field-derived data sets are critically under-represented, underscoring the need for standardization, open-access repositories, and industry–academia collaboration. Notably, the review identifies a methodological gap in evaluating model robustness and highlights opportunities for expanding model outputs to include hydrate kinetics and morphology. By integrating bibliometric insights with qualitative analysis, this review not only charts the trajectory of ML applications in gas hydrate research but also provides actionable recommendations for future work, positioning data-driven hydrate prediction at the forefront of energy and environmental innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 38","pages":"18287–18310"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Thermodynamic Gas Hydrate Studies: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Mahmood Riyadh Atta, , , Akram Fadhl Al-Mahmodi, , , Bhajan Lal*, , , Hakim Abdulrab, , and , Siak Foo Khor, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools for predicting the thermodynamic conditions of gas hydrate systems, offering an efficient and scalable alternative to traditional modeling methods. This review systematically analyzes studies published between 2016 and 2025 using a PRISMA-guided methodology and bibliometric mapping. The analysis reveals a dominant focus on binary water–gas systems (87.5%) and a strong reliance on experimental literature-derived data sets (73.9%). Artificial neural network, support vector regression, and random forest models are the most prevalent algorithms, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and root mean square error as the primary evaluation metrics, though the lack of uncertainty quantification remains a significant limitation. Field-derived data sets are critically under-represented, underscoring the need for standardization, open-access repositories, and industry–academia collaboration. Notably, the review identifies a methodological gap in evaluating model robustness and highlights opportunities for expanding model outputs to include hydrate kinetics and morphology. By integrating bibliometric insights with qualitative analysis, this review not only charts the trajectory of ML applications in gas hydrate research but also provides actionable recommendations for future work, positioning data-driven hydrate prediction at the forefront of energy and environmental innovation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 38\",\"pages\":\"18287–18310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Thermodynamic Gas Hydrate Studies: A Review
Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools for predicting the thermodynamic conditions of gas hydrate systems, offering an efficient and scalable alternative to traditional modeling methods. This review systematically analyzes studies published between 2016 and 2025 using a PRISMA-guided methodology and bibliometric mapping. The analysis reveals a dominant focus on binary water–gas systems (87.5%) and a strong reliance on experimental literature-derived data sets (73.9%). Artificial neural network, support vector regression, and random forest models are the most prevalent algorithms, with R2 and root mean square error as the primary evaluation metrics, though the lack of uncertainty quantification remains a significant limitation. Field-derived data sets are critically under-represented, underscoring the need for standardization, open-access repositories, and industry–academia collaboration. Notably, the review identifies a methodological gap in evaluating model robustness and highlights opportunities for expanding model outputs to include hydrate kinetics and morphology. By integrating bibliometric insights with qualitative analysis, this review not only charts the trajectory of ML applications in gas hydrate research but also provides actionable recommendations for future work, positioning data-driven hydrate prediction at the forefront of energy and environmental innovation.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.