人工智能和机器学习在天然气水合物热力学研究中的应用综述

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Mahmood Riyadh Atta, , , Akram Fadhl Al-Mahmodi, , , Bhajan Lal*, , , Hakim Abdulrab, , and , Siak Foo Khor, 
{"title":"人工智能和机器学习在天然气水合物热力学研究中的应用综述","authors":"Mahmood Riyadh Atta,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Akram Fadhl Al-Mahmodi,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Bhajan Lal*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Hakim Abdulrab,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Siak Foo Khor,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools for predicting the thermodynamic conditions of gas hydrate systems, offering an efficient and scalable alternative to traditional modeling methods. This review systematically analyzes studies published between 2016 and 2025 using a PRISMA-guided methodology and bibliometric mapping. The analysis reveals a dominant focus on binary water–gas systems (87.5%) and a strong reliance on experimental literature-derived data sets (73.9%). Artificial neural network, support vector regression, and random forest models are the most prevalent algorithms, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and root mean square error as the primary evaluation metrics, though the lack of uncertainty quantification remains a significant limitation. Field-derived data sets are critically under-represented, underscoring the need for standardization, open-access repositories, and industry–academia collaboration. Notably, the review identifies a methodological gap in evaluating model robustness and highlights opportunities for expanding model outputs to include hydrate kinetics and morphology. By integrating bibliometric insights with qualitative analysis, this review not only charts the trajectory of ML applications in gas hydrate research but also provides actionable recommendations for future work, positioning data-driven hydrate prediction at the forefront of energy and environmental innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 38","pages":"18287–18310"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Thermodynamic Gas Hydrate Studies: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Mahmood Riyadh Atta,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Akram Fadhl Al-Mahmodi,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Bhajan Lal*,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Hakim Abdulrab,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Siak Foo Khor,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools for predicting the thermodynamic conditions of gas hydrate systems, offering an efficient and scalable alternative to traditional modeling methods. This review systematically analyzes studies published between 2016 and 2025 using a PRISMA-guided methodology and bibliometric mapping. The analysis reveals a dominant focus on binary water–gas systems (87.5%) and a strong reliance on experimental literature-derived data sets (73.9%). Artificial neural network, support vector regression, and random forest models are the most prevalent algorithms, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> and root mean square error as the primary evaluation metrics, though the lack of uncertainty quantification remains a significant limitation. Field-derived data sets are critically under-represented, underscoring the need for standardization, open-access repositories, and industry–academia collaboration. Notably, the review identifies a methodological gap in evaluating model robustness and highlights opportunities for expanding model outputs to include hydrate kinetics and morphology. By integrating bibliometric insights with qualitative analysis, this review not only charts the trajectory of ML applications in gas hydrate research but also provides actionable recommendations for future work, positioning data-driven hydrate prediction at the forefront of energy and environmental innovation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 38\",\"pages\":\"18287–18310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c02863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能和机器学习(ML)已经成为预测天然气水合物系统热力学条件的变革性工具,为传统建模方法提供了一种高效且可扩展的替代方案。本综述系统地分析了2016年至2025年间发表的研究,使用prisma指导的方法和文献计量学制图。分析表明,主要关注二元水气系统(87.5%),并强烈依赖实验文献衍生的数据集(73.9%)。人工神经网络、支持向量回归和随机森林模型是最流行的算法,以R2和均方根误差作为主要评价指标,但缺乏不确定性量化仍然是一个重大限制。现场衍生数据集的代表性严重不足,这强调了标准化、开放存取存储库和产学研合作的必要性。值得注意的是,该综述确定了评估模型稳健性的方法差距,并强调了扩展模型输出以包括水合物动力学和形态的机会。通过将文献计量学见解与定性分析相结合,本综述不仅描绘了机器学习在天然气水合物研究中的应用轨迹,还为未来的工作提供了可操作的建议,将数据驱动的水合物预测定位在能源和环境创新的前沿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Thermodynamic Gas Hydrate Studies: A Review

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Thermodynamic Gas Hydrate Studies: A Review

Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools for predicting the thermodynamic conditions of gas hydrate systems, offering an efficient and scalable alternative to traditional modeling methods. This review systematically analyzes studies published between 2016 and 2025 using a PRISMA-guided methodology and bibliometric mapping. The analysis reveals a dominant focus on binary water–gas systems (87.5%) and a strong reliance on experimental literature-derived data sets (73.9%). Artificial neural network, support vector regression, and random forest models are the most prevalent algorithms, with R2 and root mean square error as the primary evaluation metrics, though the lack of uncertainty quantification remains a significant limitation. Field-derived data sets are critically under-represented, underscoring the need for standardization, open-access repositories, and industry–academia collaboration. Notably, the review identifies a methodological gap in evaluating model robustness and highlights opportunities for expanding model outputs to include hydrate kinetics and morphology. By integrating bibliometric insights with qualitative analysis, this review not only charts the trajectory of ML applications in gas hydrate research but also provides actionable recommendations for future work, positioning data-driven hydrate prediction at the forefront of energy and environmental innovation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信