妇女健康和福祉在气候变化国家适应计划中的优先地位:163个国家的横截面政策文件分析

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes , Gabriela Cipriano Flores , Rachel Hulme , Jessica Gong , Jane Hirst , Alice Witt , Kate Womersley , Celestine Donovan-Bradley , Edward Mullins
{"title":"妇女健康和福祉在气候变化国家适应计划中的优先地位:163个国家的横截面政策文件分析","authors":"Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes ,&nbsp;Gabriela Cipriano Flores ,&nbsp;Rachel Hulme ,&nbsp;Jessica Gong ,&nbsp;Jane Hirst ,&nbsp;Alice Witt ,&nbsp;Kate Womersley ,&nbsp;Celestine Donovan-Bradley ,&nbsp;Edward Mullins","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2025.109811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although the gendered impact of climate change is increasingly recognised, its inclusion in national adaptation plans (NAPs) remains unclear. This study investigated how the health, wellbeing and welfare of women are accounted for in climate NAPs published by 163 countries worldwide and identified the key thematic areas where the needs of women have been considered.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>NAPs were analysed across ten domains: health, gender-based violence, education, economy, power, food, environment, Emergency Preparedness, Resilience, and Response, and research and policy and 15 subdomains. Quantitative scoring used a 4-level Likert scale (none, minimal, some and substantial) for a maximum of 75 points. Content analysis was undertaken to identify themes for women’s inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Overall, countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean achieved the highest total scores (median 7.0 points), whilst Central Asia and East Asia and the Pacific achieved the lowest total scores (median 1.5 and 2.5 points, respectively). At country level, the total score ranged from 0 points for 43 countries to 56 points in Bangladesh and the median score was 28 points. The quality analysis identified the inclusion of women in policy making, the consideration of gender as an important determinant of vulnerability, and the collection and of gender-disaggregated data. Women’s vulnerability was considered across four themes: biophysiological, socioeconomic, type of work, and gender inequalities.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Consideration of women’s health, wellbeing and welfare in NAPs worldwide remains limited with a significant number of countries lacking any mention to women or gender. Further research is warranted to investigate whether policy commitments in NAPs are implemented and translate into improvement of women’s lives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":308,"journal":{"name":"Environment International","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 109811"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women’s health and wellbeing prioritisation in climate change national adaptation plans: A cross-sectional policy document analysis across 163 countries\",\"authors\":\"Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes ,&nbsp;Gabriela Cipriano Flores ,&nbsp;Rachel Hulme ,&nbsp;Jessica Gong ,&nbsp;Jane Hirst ,&nbsp;Alice Witt ,&nbsp;Kate Womersley ,&nbsp;Celestine Donovan-Bradley ,&nbsp;Edward Mullins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envint.2025.109811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although the gendered impact of climate change is increasingly recognised, its inclusion in national adaptation plans (NAPs) remains unclear. This study investigated how the health, wellbeing and welfare of women are accounted for in climate NAPs published by 163 countries worldwide and identified the key thematic areas where the needs of women have been considered.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>NAPs were analysed across ten domains: health, gender-based violence, education, economy, power, food, environment, Emergency Preparedness, Resilience, and Response, and research and policy and 15 subdomains. Quantitative scoring used a 4-level Likert scale (none, minimal, some and substantial) for a maximum of 75 points. Content analysis was undertaken to identify themes for women’s inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Overall, countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean achieved the highest total scores (median 7.0 points), whilst Central Asia and East Asia and the Pacific achieved the lowest total scores (median 1.5 and 2.5 points, respectively). At country level, the total score ranged from 0 points for 43 countries to 56 points in Bangladesh and the median score was 28 points. The quality analysis identified the inclusion of women in policy making, the consideration of gender as an important determinant of vulnerability, and the collection and of gender-disaggregated data. Women’s vulnerability was considered across four themes: biophysiological, socioeconomic, type of work, and gender inequalities.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Consideration of women’s health, wellbeing and welfare in NAPs worldwide remains limited with a significant number of countries lacking any mention to women or gender. Further research is warranted to investigate whether policy commitments in NAPs are implemented and translate into improvement of women’s lives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment International\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025005628\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025005628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们越来越认识到气候变化的性别影响,但将其纳入国家适应计划(nap)仍不清楚。这项研究调查了全球163个国家发布的气候行动计划如何考虑到妇女的健康、福祉和福利,并确定了考虑到妇女需求的关键专题领域。方法分析了10个领域的snap:健康、基于性别的暴力、教育、经济、电力、食品、环境、应急准备、复原力和响应、研究和政策以及15个子领域。定量评分采用4级李克特量表(无,最小,部分和实质),最高75分。进行了内容分析,以确定妇女参与的主题。总体而言,撒哈拉以南非洲和拉丁美洲及加勒比国家的总分最高(中位数为7.0分),而中亚和东亚及太平洋地区的总分最低(中位数分别为1.5分和2.5分)。在国家层面上,总分从43个国家的0分到孟加拉国的56分不等,中位数为28分。质量分析确定了将妇女纳入决策、考虑到性别是脆弱性的一个重要决定因素、以及收集和收集按性别分列的数据。妇女的脆弱性从四个主题来考虑:生物生理、社会经济、工作类型和性别不平等。解释:全球国家行动计划对妇女健康、福祉和福利的考虑仍然有限,许多国家没有提及妇女或性别。有必要进行进一步研究,以调查国家行动计划中的政策承诺是否得到执行并转化为妇女生活的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women’s health and wellbeing prioritisation in climate change national adaptation plans: A cross-sectional policy document analysis across 163 countries

Background

Although the gendered impact of climate change is increasingly recognised, its inclusion in national adaptation plans (NAPs) remains unclear. This study investigated how the health, wellbeing and welfare of women are accounted for in climate NAPs published by 163 countries worldwide and identified the key thematic areas where the needs of women have been considered.

Methods

NAPs were analysed across ten domains: health, gender-based violence, education, economy, power, food, environment, Emergency Preparedness, Resilience, and Response, and research and policy and 15 subdomains. Quantitative scoring used a 4-level Likert scale (none, minimal, some and substantial) for a maximum of 75 points. Content analysis was undertaken to identify themes for women’s inclusion.

Findings

Overall, countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean achieved the highest total scores (median 7.0 points), whilst Central Asia and East Asia and the Pacific achieved the lowest total scores (median 1.5 and 2.5 points, respectively). At country level, the total score ranged from 0 points for 43 countries to 56 points in Bangladesh and the median score was 28 points. The quality analysis identified the inclusion of women in policy making, the consideration of gender as an important determinant of vulnerability, and the collection and of gender-disaggregated data. Women’s vulnerability was considered across four themes: biophysiological, socioeconomic, type of work, and gender inequalities.

Interpretation

Consideration of women’s health, wellbeing and welfare in NAPs worldwide remains limited with a significant number of countries lacking any mention to women or gender. Further research is warranted to investigate whether policy commitments in NAPs are implemented and translate into improvement of women’s lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment International
Environment International 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
734
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts focusing on critical aspects of environmental and occupational medicine, including studies in toxicology and epidemiology, to illuminate the human health implications of exposure to environmental hazards. The journal adopts an open-access model and practices open peer review. It caters to scientists and practitioners across all environmental science domains, directly or indirectly impacting human health and well-being. With a commitment to enhancing the prevention of environmentally-related health risks, Environmental Health serves as a public health journal for the community and scientists engaged in matters of public health significance concerning the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信