尼日利亚回返者支持、歧视和重返社会方面的地区差异

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Ngozi Louis Uzomah
{"title":"尼日利亚回返者支持、歧视和重返社会方面的地区差异","authors":"Ngozi Louis Uzomah","doi":"10.1111/imig.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The study aimed to spatially analyse returnee support sources, stigmatisation and reintegration in Nigeria. Data were collected between March 2022 and May 2023 using a mixed-method approach, including surveys with 444 returnees from two towns in each of Nigeria's six geopolitical zones as well as in-depth interviews with 18 returnees and 13 stakeholders. Findings show that about two-thirds planned to re-migrate, primarily due to stigma. Discrimination and negative stereotypes hinder reintegration, while support from family and friends helps reduce stigmatisation. Regional disparities reveal the North-West and South-South have the most effective AVR implementation, while the South-West faces greater challenges. The South-East reports the highest stigmatisation level, followed distantly by the South-West, while the North-Central and South-West have the lowest reintegration rates. The study recommends targeted, culturally sensitive policies to reduce stigma and promote acceptance, stressing the need for long-term integration strategies in host countries over continued investment in ineffective Assisted Voluntary Return (AVR) programmes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Disparities in Returnee Support, Stigmatisation and Reintegration in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Ngozi Louis Uzomah\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imig.70103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The study aimed to spatially analyse returnee support sources, stigmatisation and reintegration in Nigeria. Data were collected between March 2022 and May 2023 using a mixed-method approach, including surveys with 444 returnees from two towns in each of Nigeria's six geopolitical zones as well as in-depth interviews with 18 returnees and 13 stakeholders. Findings show that about two-thirds planned to re-migrate, primarily due to stigma. Discrimination and negative stereotypes hinder reintegration, while support from family and friends helps reduce stigmatisation. Regional disparities reveal the North-West and South-South have the most effective AVR implementation, while the South-West faces greater challenges. The South-East reports the highest stigmatisation level, followed distantly by the South-West, while the North-Central and South-West have the lowest reintegration rates. The study recommends targeted, culturally sensitive policies to reduce stigma and promote acceptance, stressing the need for long-term integration strategies in host countries over continued investment in ineffective Assisted Voluntary Return (AVR) programmes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Migration\",\"volume\":\"63 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Migration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imig.70103\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imig.70103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在从空间上分析返回者在尼日利亚的支助来源、污名化和重新融入社会。数据是在2022年3月至2023年5月期间使用混合方法收集的,包括对来自尼日利亚六个地缘政治区域每个城镇的444名返回者进行调查,以及对18名返回者和13名利益相关者进行深入访谈。研究结果显示,大约三分之二的人计划再次迁移,主要是由于耻辱。歧视和负面陈规定型观念阻碍了重返社会,而来自家人和朋友的支持有助于减少污名化。区域差异表明,西北和南南地区的AVR实施最有效,而西南地区面临更大的挑战。东南部报告的污名化程度最高,其次是西南部,而中北部和西南部的重返社会率最低。该研究建议采取有针对性的、具有文化敏感性的政策来减少耻辱感并促进接受,强调东道国需要长期融入战略,而不是继续投资于无效的协助自愿返回(AVR)计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Regional Disparities in Returnee Support, Stigmatisation and Reintegration in Nigeria

Regional Disparities in Returnee Support, Stigmatisation and Reintegration in Nigeria

The study aimed to spatially analyse returnee support sources, stigmatisation and reintegration in Nigeria. Data were collected between March 2022 and May 2023 using a mixed-method approach, including surveys with 444 returnees from two towns in each of Nigeria's six geopolitical zones as well as in-depth interviews with 18 returnees and 13 stakeholders. Findings show that about two-thirds planned to re-migrate, primarily due to stigma. Discrimination and negative stereotypes hinder reintegration, while support from family and friends helps reduce stigmatisation. Regional disparities reveal the North-West and South-South have the most effective AVR implementation, while the South-West faces greater challenges. The South-East reports the highest stigmatisation level, followed distantly by the South-West, while the North-Central and South-West have the lowest reintegration rates. The study recommends targeted, culturally sensitive policies to reduce stigma and promote acceptance, stressing the need for long-term integration strategies in host countries over continued investment in ineffective Assisted Voluntary Return (AVR) programmes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: International Migration is a refereed, policy oriented journal on migration issues as analysed by demographers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and other social scientists from all parts of the world. It covers the entire field of policy relevance in international migration, giving attention not only to a breadth of topics reflective of policy concerns, but also attention to coverage of all regions of the world and to comparative policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信