{"title":"异基因干细胞移植最佳CPX-351治疗时间和时机的真实世界研究。","authors":"Fabio Guolo,Luana Fianchi,Maria Paola Martelli,Federico Lussana,Francesco Grimaldi,Federica Pilo,Michela Rondoni,Carla Filì,Paola Minetto,Debora Capelli,Patrizia Chiusolo,Massimo Breccia,Sara Mastaglio,Massimo Bernardi,Monica Bocchia,Monica Fumagalli,Sara Galimberti,Valentina Mancini,Anna Lisa Piccioni,Luca Maurillo,Nicola Stefano Fracchiolla,Raffaele Palmieri,Calogero Vetro,Cristina Papayannidis,Lorenzo Brunetti,Alessandra Sperotto,Federica Gigli,Patrizia Zappasodi,Antonino Mulé,Caterina Patti,Erika Borlenghi,Michelina Dargenio,Federica Lessi,Marco Cerrano,Daniela Cilloni,Alessandro Isidori,Monia Lunghi,Caterina Alati,Carmela Gurrieri,Carola Riva,Giovanni Marconi,Ivana Lotesoriere,Samuele Gatani,Anna Maria Scattolin,Manuela Caizzi,Salvatore Perrone,Atto Billio,Filippo Gherlinzoni,Francesco Mannelli,Michele Gottardi,Roberto Cairoli,Anna Candoni,Felicetto Ferrara,Livio Pagano,Roberto Massimo Lemoli,Adriano Venditti,Elisabetta Todisco","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the registration clinical trial 301 (NCT01696084), CPX-351 has shown to be superior to conventional 3 + 7 in secondary AML (s-AML). However, the optimal duration of treatment, the best timing for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and the activity of CPX-351 in specific s-AML subgroups are unclear. To evaluate these aspects, a total of 513 s-AML patients (median age 65.6 years, 19-79) treated with CPX-351 were retrospectively analyzed. Complete remission (CR) rate after induction was 297/513 (58%), increasing to 340/513 (66%) after cycle 2. Among the 340 responding patients, 118 (34.7%), 137 (40.3%), and 85 (25%) received none, one, or two consolidation cycles of CPX-351, respectively. Overall, 230/513 patients (48.8%) received allo-HSCT. Median follow up was 23.66 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.23 months. Patients with mutated NPM1 or with ELN 2017 favorable risk (p < 0.05) had a significantly longer OS (p < 0.05). In a landmark analysis, receiving allo-HSCT was associated with a longer survival (Median OS not reached vs. 16.3 months for patients receiving or not receiving allo-HSCT, p < 0.05). Completion of all allowed CPX-351 cycles was beneficial only in patients not proceeding to transplant (p < 0.05), whereas in transplanted patients additional CPX-351 cycles did not improve outcome. Our analysis suggests that also s-AML patients with NPM1 mutations and those belonging to the ELN 2017 favorable risk category benefit from CPX-351. In eligible patients, allo-HSCT should be performed as soon as a CR is achieved, whereas patients not undergoing transplant benefit from a complete CPX-351 schedule.","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real World Study on the Best CPX-351 Treatment Duration and Timing for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Guolo,Luana Fianchi,Maria Paola Martelli,Federico Lussana,Francesco Grimaldi,Federica Pilo,Michela Rondoni,Carla Filì,Paola Minetto,Debora Capelli,Patrizia Chiusolo,Massimo Breccia,Sara Mastaglio,Massimo Bernardi,Monica Bocchia,Monica Fumagalli,Sara Galimberti,Valentina Mancini,Anna Lisa Piccioni,Luca Maurillo,Nicola Stefano Fracchiolla,Raffaele Palmieri,Calogero Vetro,Cristina Papayannidis,Lorenzo Brunetti,Alessandra Sperotto,Federica Gigli,Patrizia Zappasodi,Antonino Mulé,Caterina Patti,Erika Borlenghi,Michelina Dargenio,Federica Lessi,Marco Cerrano,Daniela Cilloni,Alessandro Isidori,Monia Lunghi,Caterina Alati,Carmela Gurrieri,Carola Riva,Giovanni Marconi,Ivana Lotesoriere,Samuele Gatani,Anna Maria Scattolin,Manuela Caizzi,Salvatore Perrone,Atto Billio,Filippo Gherlinzoni,Francesco Mannelli,Michele Gottardi,Roberto Cairoli,Anna Candoni,Felicetto Ferrara,Livio Pagano,Roberto Massimo Lemoli,Adriano Venditti,Elisabetta Todisco\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajh.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the registration clinical trial 301 (NCT01696084), CPX-351 has shown to be superior to conventional 3 + 7 in secondary AML (s-AML). However, the optimal duration of treatment, the best timing for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and the activity of CPX-351 in specific s-AML subgroups are unclear. To evaluate these aspects, a total of 513 s-AML patients (median age 65.6 years, 19-79) treated with CPX-351 were retrospectively analyzed. Complete remission (CR) rate after induction was 297/513 (58%), increasing to 340/513 (66%) after cycle 2. Among the 340 responding patients, 118 (34.7%), 137 (40.3%), and 85 (25%) received none, one, or two consolidation cycles of CPX-351, respectively. Overall, 230/513 patients (48.8%) received allo-HSCT. Median follow up was 23.66 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.23 months. Patients with mutated NPM1 or with ELN 2017 favorable risk (p < 0.05) had a significantly longer OS (p < 0.05). In a landmark analysis, receiving allo-HSCT was associated with a longer survival (Median OS not reached vs. 16.3 months for patients receiving or not receiving allo-HSCT, p < 0.05). Completion of all allowed CPX-351 cycles was beneficial only in patients not proceeding to transplant (p < 0.05), whereas in transplanted patients additional CPX-351 cycles did not improve outcome. Our analysis suggests that also s-AML patients with NPM1 mutations and those belonging to the ELN 2017 favorable risk category benefit from CPX-351. In eligible patients, allo-HSCT should be performed as soon as a CR is achieved, whereas patients not undergoing transplant benefit from a complete CPX-351 schedule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hematology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70083\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real World Study on the Best CPX-351 Treatment Duration and Timing for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.
In the registration clinical trial 301 (NCT01696084), CPX-351 has shown to be superior to conventional 3 + 7 in secondary AML (s-AML). However, the optimal duration of treatment, the best timing for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and the activity of CPX-351 in specific s-AML subgroups are unclear. To evaluate these aspects, a total of 513 s-AML patients (median age 65.6 years, 19-79) treated with CPX-351 were retrospectively analyzed. Complete remission (CR) rate after induction was 297/513 (58%), increasing to 340/513 (66%) after cycle 2. Among the 340 responding patients, 118 (34.7%), 137 (40.3%), and 85 (25%) received none, one, or two consolidation cycles of CPX-351, respectively. Overall, 230/513 patients (48.8%) received allo-HSCT. Median follow up was 23.66 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.23 months. Patients with mutated NPM1 or with ELN 2017 favorable risk (p < 0.05) had a significantly longer OS (p < 0.05). In a landmark analysis, receiving allo-HSCT was associated with a longer survival (Median OS not reached vs. 16.3 months for patients receiving or not receiving allo-HSCT, p < 0.05). Completion of all allowed CPX-351 cycles was beneficial only in patients not proceeding to transplant (p < 0.05), whereas in transplanted patients additional CPX-351 cycles did not improve outcome. Our analysis suggests that also s-AML patients with NPM1 mutations and those belonging to the ELN 2017 favorable risk category benefit from CPX-351. In eligible patients, allo-HSCT should be performed as soon as a CR is achieved, whereas patients not undergoing transplant benefit from a complete CPX-351 schedule.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.