Luiza Pretto, Eduarda Nabinger, Ivan Sereno Montenegro, Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino, Osvaldo Artigalás, Fernanda Sales Luiz Vianna, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Lucas Rosa Fraga
{"title":"为了明确:为什么我们需要规范“复发性流产”一词。","authors":"Luiza Pretto, Eduarda Nabinger, Ivan Sereno Montenegro, Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino, Osvaldo Artigalás, Fernanda Sales Luiz Vianna, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Lucas Rosa Fraga","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20250158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a complex reproductive condition that remains difficult to manage. Despite advances in identifying risk factors and treating cases with known causes, about half of the cases are still idiopathic, making effective treatment and prognosis challenging. In addition to clinical hurdles, a major issue in both the literature and medical community is the lack of standardization in terminology and precise definition for RPL. Here, we review the main discrepancies in current definitions and support adopting the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss' as the most appropriate and inclusive. We recommend recognizing RPL as a specific subtype of secondary infertility, characterized by two or more pregnancy losses. Standardizing this terminology is crucial for improving diagnosis, research comparison, and patient care in reproductive medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":"29 3","pages":"407-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.\",\"authors\":\"Luiza Pretto, Eduarda Nabinger, Ivan Sereno Montenegro, Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino, Osvaldo Artigalás, Fernanda Sales Luiz Vianna, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Lucas Rosa Fraga\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20250158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a complex reproductive condition that remains difficult to manage. Despite advances in identifying risk factors and treating cases with known causes, about half of the cases are still idiopathic, making effective treatment and prognosis challenging. In addition to clinical hurdles, a major issue in both the literature and medical community is the lack of standardization in terminology and precise definition for RPL. Here, we review the main discrepancies in current definitions and support adopting the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss' as the most appropriate and inclusive. We recommend recognizing RPL as a specific subtype of secondary infertility, characterized by two or more pregnancy losses. Standardizing this terminology is crucial for improving diagnosis, research comparison, and patient care in reproductive medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBRA assisted reproduction\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"407-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469224/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBRA assisted reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20250158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward clarity: why we need to standardize the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss'.
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a complex reproductive condition that remains difficult to manage. Despite advances in identifying risk factors and treating cases with known causes, about half of the cases are still idiopathic, making effective treatment and prognosis challenging. In addition to clinical hurdles, a major issue in both the literature and medical community is the lack of standardization in terminology and precise definition for RPL. Here, we review the main discrepancies in current definitions and support adopting the term 'recurrent pregnancy loss' as the most appropriate and inclusive. We recommend recognizing RPL as a specific subtype of secondary infertility, characterized by two or more pregnancy losses. Standardizing this terminology is crucial for improving diagnosis, research comparison, and patient care in reproductive medicine.